@MedicMind Can you please mark my essay?
A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections - a mere heart of stone.
Explain what this statement means. Argue that scientific enquiry benefits from personal wishes and affections. To what extent do you think a scientist should have a 'mere heart of stone'?
Facts, objectivity and reliability are key feature of science. In terms of scientific research, this statement might mean that for effective findings to be sought, a scientist's opinion should be disregarded. This is because both demand characteristics and social desirability can result in bias, thus affecting the reliability and validity of findings.
However, scientific enquiry benefits from personal wishes and affections. For example, in the medical field, patients may be suffering from anxiety and stress due to their awareness of their condition. In this case, a doctor must be able to empathise and sympathise with the patient. Understanding the patient's emotions and providing comfort can easily improve the patient's well-being. The importance is also highlighted in hospices where palliative care provides emotional support for patients with terminal illnesses as well as support for the family members of the patient.
In terms of scientific research, ethical guidelines are usually involved, especially in socially sensitive research. If a scientist were to have no affection, this could impose both physical and psychological harm to subjects. It is unfair to experiment on participants without their informed consent, no matter how important the research may be, as all individuals have their own rights. Similarly, Dolly the Sheep has contributed to the advances in science in terms of cloning, but what about the harm caused to Dolly? Surely, animals have rights too?
I believe that scientists should not have a 'mere heart of stone' as research often brings ethical and moral guidelines into consideration. For the rights of humans and animals to be respected, a scientific person must have emotions in order to understand the potential harm that could be caused.