AQA GEOGRAPHY ANSWERS &amp; DISCUSSION paper 2 5th june

OP

any ides of grade bundaries????????//

Reply 182

Original post by DarkDynamite

I wrote about Bristol and how people moving to the city will benefit businesses as they gain more income. then i just mentioned one of the opportunities in Bristol and said that it would attract people to move to the city and increase income for businesses... Does that sound about right??

For that one, I mentioned Filwood and Stoke Bishop, an area of urban deprivation and affluent suburbs. I talked about the GCSE grades from 36% to 94%, and how it will migrate people to the more educated areas. :smile:

Reply 183

Original post by steady1911123

yeah my school studied manchester, I said about brownfield sites and greenfield sites, thus higher urban sprawl, causing more pollution and loss of habitats causing a decrease in biodiversity; I also said about the gentrification of the city centre making Hulme seem visually pollutive in contrast

YAY! I said that too. :smile:

Reply 184

OP

Original post by MydaMina

For that one, I mentioned Filwood and Stoke Bishop, an area of urban deprivation and affluent suburbs. I talked about the GCSE grades from 36% to 94%, and how it will migrate people to the more educated areas. :smile:

for which question are you talking about

Reply 185

Original post by malkimoo

for which question are you talking about

National migration or the equality in education 1 of them, IDK

Reply 186

OP

oh does that mean i needed to use an example in the equality qeustion or could i have still got full marks without it

Original post by MydaMina

National migration or the equality in education 1 of them, IDK

Reply 187

Original post by malkimoo

oh does that mean i needed to use an example in the equality qeustion or could i have still got full marks without it

You probably got some marks either way. However it'll impress the examiner with the reference of precise cities and statistical references to back up the point. :-)

Reply 188

OP

Original post by MydaMina

You probably got some marks either way. However it'll impress the examiner with the reference of precise cities and statistical references to back up the point. :-)

oh im such an idiot for forgetting to include my examples... i basically wrote that less investment in an area leads to less good jobs so less income so less paid in tax so less money the authorities have to invest in education.. could that still get full marks

Reply 189

OP

Original post by MydaMina

You probably got some marks either way. However it'll impress the examiner with the reference of precise cities and statistical references to back up the point. :-)

how did you find the paper and what grade/mark do you think you got

Reply 190

Original post by malkimoo

oh im such an idiot for forgetting to include my examples... i basically wrote that less investment in an area leads to less good jobs so less income so less paid in tax so less money the authorities have to invest in education.. could that still get full marks

DW, sure you did fine. That answer looks reasonable, I'll say 2-3 marks off full. It's still good though. :smile:

Reply 191

bob smith122333

11

Original post by malkimoo

any ides of grade bundaries????????//

last year 70% was an a star(8). coz its a new spec im thinking either lower or the same. it won't be higher. for a 9 im guessing at least in excess of 75% possibly 80%

Reply 192

OP