There are some questions left that haven't been thought of or predicted or explained very well. Take this one for instance:
1) Assess the benefits to the Swedish government if they want to keep the 35 year old Pharmacy as a monopoly.
Many of us have only decided that it was going to be de-regulated which it is supposed to by the end of the year 2009 but that's external information, feel free whether to put that in the exam or not. But nobody thought of, if the Swedish government wanted to keep it.
The Answer: A monopoly is the only provider of a certain product in an economy.
As a monopoly, it tends to operate on a large scale and consequently gain from economies of scale, therefore this can reduce the average costs of production, and these savings can be passed on to the consumer in the form of lower prices.
In some cases, to maintain a monopoly, this is because they consider the industry to be more efficient in the hands of one supplier. Also, the government keeps full control over this monopoly (especially as it deals with medicine or drugs which means a very important service and product to the whole community) and should afford the medicine at affordable prices.
However,
There would be a potential increase in prices due to lack of competition and a danger of restriction to consumer choices. There would also be a lack of incentives for the government to increase its efficiency (Mostly subsidized)
Monopolists may be less efficient because if they believe that they have a protected market they may be less inclined to spend money on research and development and improved management. These inefficiencies can lead to a waste of scarce resources.
The Swedish Government owned Vin and Sprit for 90 years, it has recognized brand image, a value of 2-3 billion, and 7% growing sales per annum.
Assess why the Swedish Government would want to sell such a thriving business?
The Swedish government, through its supply side policy (production) by privatizing state owned businesses is mainly trying to create more jobs and expanding companies. If the state owned business is efficient with a brand image of 2-3 billion in value then it's going to be sold at an extortionately high price, especially that the Swedish government is implementing its policy through privatization.
There will also be very high revenue to the government due to the business success and a high value brand image. Also, selling it to the private sector means more money will be invested in the business to prove its efficiency. New Jobs will also be created as the business gets larger and becomes global. More competition which leads to better services and lower prices (due to profit motive)
More innovation and new product development will occur. As competition arises there will be more branches and outlets for the benefit of the consumers.
However, The sale of this business should be monitored so that it will not turn into a private monopoly and exploit consumers without taking into consideration the social responsibility. Also, the Swedish government took time in making the decision to sell because it does not want to sell it any bidder before taking time researching them.
"Electricity and gas prices have fallen in somewhat real terms; rail and bus fares have risen"
Describe what is meant by real terms and explain why the rail and bus fares have risen
Real terms mean after removing the inflation rate (which is a key that they want you to know inflation)
After removing the inflation rate, the prices of gas and electricity have fallen. What is meant is that the prices of gas and electricity have only fallen due to the removal of inflation rate, whereas they havent REALLY fallen in real terms.
This explains the contradiction between the gas and electricity prices and the rail and bus fares. Rail and bus fares have increased because of inflation.
PLEASE NOTE THAT THE ANSWERS ABOVE ARE NOT MODEL ESSAY ANSWERS, THEY ARE JUST POINTS.
Hope the above helps,
Good luck to everyone in the exam,it should be easy considering all the work we've done. Peace