- Forums
###### A-level Maths Mechanics: SUVAT Question HELP

Watch

4 months ago

Here is the question: A stone(1) is projected vertically upwards from a point O, with an initial speed of 8ms. At the same instant, another stone(2) is dropped from 5m above point O. Find the height above O at which the stones collide.

I have tried to model both stones by making the acceleration of both -9.8ms. Here is what I thought I knew about each stone.

Stone 1: Final s = s - 5, t=t, u=0, a = -9.8ms

Stone 2: s=s, t=t, u=8, t=-9.8ms

I am trying to find both displacements in terms of t and solve the equations simultaniously. Im stuck and don't know if I'm taking the right approach.

I have tried to model both stones by making the acceleration of both -9.8ms. Here is what I thought I knew about each stone.

Stone 1: Final s = s - 5, t=t, u=0, a = -9.8ms

Stone 2: s=s, t=t, u=8, t=-9.8ms

I am trying to find both displacements in terms of t and solve the equations simultaniously. Im stuck and don't know if I'm taking the right approach.

Original post by academicWeapon__

Here is the question: A stone(1) is projected vertically upwards from a point O, with an initial speed of 8ms. At the same instant, another stone(2) is dropped from 5m above point O. Find the height above O at which the stones collide.

I have tried to model both stones by making the acceleration of both -9.8ms. Here is what I thought I knew about each stone.

Stone 1: Final s = s - 5, t=t, u=0, a = -9.8ms

Stone 2: s=s, t=t, u=8, t=-9.8ms

I am trying to find both displacements in terms of t and solve the equations simultaniously. Im stuck and don't know if I'm taking the right approach.

I have tried to model both stones by making the acceleration of both -9.8ms. Here is what I thought I knew about each stone.

Stone 1: Final s = s - 5, t=t, u=0, a = -9.8ms

Stone 2: s=s, t=t, u=8, t=-9.8ms

I am trying to find both displacements in terms of t and solve the equations simultaniously. Im stuck and don't know if I'm taking the right approach.

Sort of. Id sketch the diagram and mark on the positive direction (upwards you seem to choose), the origin O, the displacement above O (s), and the info for each stone. Then form the suvats, equate and solve.

Note you can simply solve it by thinking about the relative motion of the stones, but its worth getting the usual suvat approach sorted first.

(edited 4 months ago)

Reply 2

4 months ago

Original post by mqb2766

Sort of. Id sketch the diagram and mark on the positive direction (upwards you seem to choose), the origin O, the displacement above O (s), and the info for each stone. Then form the suvats, equate and solve.

Note you can simply solve it by thinking about the relative motion of the stones, but its worth getting the usual suvat approach sorted first.

Note you can simply solve it by thinking about the relative motion of the stones, but its worth getting the usual suvat approach sorted first.

Thanks

Original post by academicWeapon__

Thanks

Upload your sketch and any working if you cant get it to work. In the OP you have u=8 for stone 2, and the initial height 5 seems to be applied to stone 1, so make sure its all consistent.

(edited 4 months ago)

Reply 4

4 months ago

Original post by mqb2766

Upload your sketch and any working if you cant get it to work. In the OP you have u=8 for stone 2, and the initial height 5 seems to be applied to stone 1, so make sure its all consistent.

Heres the equations i formed:

for stone 1: 5-s = ut+1/2at^2 => s=4.9t^2 -5

for stone 2: s = ut+1/2at^2 => s=8t-4.9t^2

Is this correct?

What do I do next, set them as equal?

(edited 4 months ago)

Original post by academicWeapon__

Heres the equations i formed:

for stone 1: 5-s = ut+1/2at^2 => s=4.9t^2 -5

for stone 2: s = ut+1/2at^2 => s=8t-4.9t^2

Is this correct?

What do I do next, set them as equal?

for stone 1: 5-s = ut+1/2at^2 => s=4.9t^2 -5

for stone 2: s = ut+1/2at^2 => s=8t-4.9t^2

Is this correct?

What do I do next, set them as equal?

For the sketch, its vertical motion and Id draw it as such. Mark on postive upwards with an arrow.

S1 is at the bottom (the origin) and the displacement (positive upwards) represents the height above O which is what the question asks for . Its initial velocity is 8 (positive upwards). So s = ut + 1/2 at^2.

S2 is at the top (5m above (positive) the origin O). Its dispalcement above O can be modelled as s = 5 + ut + 1/2 at^2. Obv u=0 for this stone.

So then equate and solve.and when you get s, that represets the height above O which is what the question asks for. Your suvats etc may get something similar, but its worth getting it "correct" at the start.

Reply 6

4 months ago

Original post by mqb2766

For the sketch, its vertical motion and Id draw it as such. Mark on postive upwards with an arrow.

S1 is at the bottom (the origin) and the displacement (positive upwards) represents the height above O which is what the question asks for . Its initial velocity is 8 (positive upwards). So s = ut + 1/2 at^2.

S2 is at the top (5m above (positive) the origin O). Its dispalcement above O can be modelled as s = 5 + ut + 1/2 at^2. Obv u=0 for this stone.

So then equate and solve.and when you get s, that represets the height above O which is what the question asks for. Your suvats etc may get something similar, but its worth getting it "correct" at the start.

S1 is at the bottom (the origin) and the displacement (positive upwards) represents the height above O which is what the question asks for . Its initial velocity is 8 (positive upwards). So s = ut + 1/2 at^2.

S2 is at the top (5m above (positive) the origin O). Its dispalcement above O can be modelled as s = 5 + ut + 1/2 at^2. Obv u=0 for this stone.

So then equate and solve.and when you get s, that represets the height above O which is what the question asks for. Your suvats etc may get something similar, but its worth getting it "correct" at the start.

Heres what I got:

5-4.9t^2 = 8t - 4.9t^2

5=8t

t=0.625

s = 3.09

so the height they meet is 3.09m

Does that seem right?

Original post by academicWeapon__

Heres what I got:

5-4.9t^2 = 8t - 4.9t^2

5=8t

t=0.625

s = 3.09

so the height they meet is 3.09m

Does that seem right?

5-4.9t^2 = 8t - 4.9t^2

5=8t

t=0.625

s = 3.09

so the height they meet is 3.09m

Does that seem right?

Seems about right. The relative motion approach says that as the stones have the same acceleration, Stone1 must approach Stone2 with a constant (zero relative acceleration) relative velocity of 8m/s. It must cover 5m for them to meet so t=5/8 and hence s = 5 - 4.9(5/8)^2.

So the suvats reduce to the above, as they should.

(edited 4 months ago)

Reply 8

4 months ago

Original post by mqb2766

Seems about right. The relative motion approach says that as the stones have the same acceleration, Stone1 must approach Stone2 with a constant (zero relative acceleration) relative velocity of 8m/s. It must cover 5m for them to meet so t=5/8 and hence s = 5 - 4.9(5/8)^2.

So the suvats reduce to the above, as they should.

So the suvats reduce to the above, as they should.

Thanks for your help.

- Suvat questions and their purpose
- A level maths mechanics
- A-level maths help!
- Mathematics Mechanics enough for Physics?
- Studying Physics
- Maths help!!
- A-level Mathematics Study Group 2023-2024
- A Level Physics Mechanics HELPP!!!
- Mechanics A Level Maths Problem
- Doing AS Physics over the Summer holidays?
- I don't like suvat equations, can I sketch graphs instead?
- AS maths helppp
- Kinematics maths a level year 2 integral
- Physics vs Chemistry A level
- Does this matter hugely?
- A level maths mechanics vectors question
- Which is harder chemistry or physics a level?
- Edexcel A Level Mathematics Paper 3 (9MA0 03) - 20th June 2023 [Exam Chat]
- As maths
- A level revision amounts ?

- A closer look at Clayhill halls of residence!
- Middlesex Veterinary Nursing Interview 2024
- MPhil Politics and International Studies 2024
- Official: University of East Anglia (UEA) A100 2024 Entry
- Girls Vs. Boys (Part 46)
- University of Leeds Complaints
- Exam in the middle of camp
- Pupillage Application 2023-2024
- Imperial Medical Biosciences 2024 entry
- 2023/24 Ask a UAL Student
- Mastercard Africa scholarship funding MPhil cambridge 24-25
- Official LSE Offer Holders Thread for 2024 entry
- Official Oxford 2024 Postgraduate Applicants Thread
- Official: Queen's University Belfast A100 2024 Entry Applicants
- BBC Apprenticeship 2024
- Parents of vet med applicants
- Official: Keele University A100 2024 Entry Applicants
- Evaluating, Remembering and reading text
- Cambridge postgraduate application: Decision pending - application is under review
- Official: St George's, University of London A100 2024 Entry

- 2024 UK Drama School Auditions
- Are tattoos lower class?
- Accomodation.
- Oxford Intelligent Earth CDT 2024
- Accommodation
- Civil Service Fast Stream 2024 - Applicants thread
- UCL vs Oxford for Politics
- KCL pharmacy interview 2024
- JP Morgan Technology Degree Apprenticeship 2024
- Met police vetting
- Official Dental Hygiene and Therapy (Oral Health Science) 2024 Entry Thread
- Digital Humanities PhD/MPhil 2024 Entry
- Official: Lancaster University A100 2024 Entry Applicants
- A-level Geography Study Group 2023-2024
- Law offers - 2024 entry
- UAL London College of Fashion or Leeds Arts University for Fashion Design?
- Amazon Degree Apprenticeships 2024 - Assessment Centre
- KCL medical school term dates?
- Aviva Graduate Pathway 2024
- ATAS (Academic, Technology, Approval Scheme) Certificate 2023/2024

- UKMT Intermediate Math Challenge 2024 - Discussion
- GCSE Mathematics Study Group 2023-2024
- A-level Mathematics Study Group 2023-2024
- Mock set 4 paper 2 q14 a level maths (4 distinct points)
- STEP foundation module help pls
- Ukmt IMC 2024
- ukmt imc
- Confused on surds question
- HNC MATHS A2 Task 3 (Radio Transmitters)
- Is this a joke or am I actually missing something?

- UKMT Intermediate Math Challenge 2024 - Discussion
- GCSE Mathematics Study Group 2023-2024
- A-level Mathematics Study Group 2023-2024
- Mock set 4 paper 2 q14 a level maths (4 distinct points)
- STEP foundation module help pls
- Ukmt IMC 2024
- ukmt imc
- Confused on surds question
- HNC MATHS A2 Task 3 (Radio Transmitters)
- Is this a joke or am I actually missing something?

The Student Room and The Uni Guide are both part of The Student Room Group.

© Copyright The Student Room 2024 all rights reserved

The Student Room and The Uni Guide are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: Imperial House, 2nd Floor, 40-42 Queens Road, Brighton, East Sussex, BN1 3XB