The Student Room Group

Geography AQA A2 Unit 4B

Scroll to see replies

i thought it was ok really

for the justification question i said:
we as a developed country and one of the largest countries have a moral obligation
we have specialist skills, e.g/ scuba rice
it our globalisation that is affecting them hugely
other countries are helping them e.g. japan so we should too
i also said if we help them to industrialise they may become a 4th/5th generation NIC
Reply 161
That is akin to how I perceived the question as you would not justify with negatives. You could have gone down the route of some would say blah (negative) however etc.
For the first question I went down proportional symbols as the A2 book said that cloropleth shows density and therefore must account for the size of the area. Although it then goes on to say that it was ok for % so I just stayed away just in case - proportional symbols will be fine I think.

And I'm so annoyed with myself as I had a great Malthusian theory paragraph to bang in and I didn't :frown: never mind eh.

Because so many people found this easier do you think the grade boundaries will shoot up ????

Oh p.s I argued down the route of why Bangladesh should get our aid as opposed to why we should give it and the benefit to us - will this loose me too many marks ????
(edited 12 years ago)
Reply 162
Original post by andynejad
yeah i agree think it was just to justify, although im sure the bad points wont do any harm but yeah it asked why they should be justified. i mentioned how it would be put to good use, that we produce all the emissions and it has a bad effect on them, and then that the taxpayers money could be spent on training the people of bangladesh to work in the uk if it was needed because of the ageing workforce, simply cus that guy in booklet suggested it!


same! may have accidentally come across a little xenophobic, as i said something along the lines of 'well lots migrate to the UK and find themselves in poverty and unemployment, so if we don't want this we should pay for them to sort their lives out so they can stay in bangladesh' ahaaa, came out completely wrong obviously! :tongue:
Reply 163
I thought it was a decent paper apart from question 1.
I haven't done choropleths since GCSE, and couldn't think of anything else. In the end i did coloured zones eg. Orange for 1-5 deaths. Then talked about how this gives the reader a clear comparison between the worst and least effected zones. It actually came out quite nice with the worst effected zones on the west and then reducing mainly to the west in colour.
Anyone think i'll get away with some marks for that?
Reply 164
Original post by Jack1993
I thought it was a decent paper apart from question 1.
I haven't done choropleths since GCSE, and couldn't think of anything else. In the end i did coloured zones eg. Orange for 1-5 deaths. Then talked about how this gives the reader a clear comparison between the worst and least effected zones. It actually came out quite nice with the worst effected zones on the west and then reducing mainly to the west in colour.
Anyone think i'll get away with some marks for that?


yep think thats what most did, but you were only supposed to do one district, not the whole map :smile:
Reply 165
Original post by sfriday
same! may have accidentally come across a little xenophobic, as i said something along the lines of 'well lots migrate to the UK and find themselves in poverty and unemployment, so if we don't want this we should pay for them to sort their lives out so they can stay in bangladesh' ahaaa, came out completely wrong obviously! :tongue:


Hahaha same!! =P well i said pressure on resources.. oops..
Original post by sfriday
yep think thats what most did, but you were only supposed to do one district, not the whole map :smile:


oh really? i did the whole map...surely they can't penalise me for that
Original post by sfriday
one thing, maybe i'm wrong, but the taxpayer question said 'make a justification..', so i only wrote good things about using taxpayer money? is this wrong? oops.


Yes, it was a justification. So we did have to argue that it was good.

But I've always been taught to write both sides of the argument, so I started with the negative things, and then went on to explain about all the positive attributes, leading to the conclusion that it was a good thing overall.

Sorry for the confusion :smile:

EDIT; specifically, these are the points I made;

Bad
-Bangladesh is dependant on the aid given by the DfID, and thus it is an unsustainable method of helping.
-In the UK, we are already massively in debt, and giving out the £129.7m to Bangladesh won't help us as a country
-One other thing, can't remember exactly

Good
-It's a moral obligation; 50% live below the poverty line; unacceptable by our standards
-Aid increases the economy/employment, leading to the multiplier effect, better infrastructure, education etc.
-There are many bottom up approaches, that could potentially allow the community to develop by theirselves (Booklet said something about giving "tools" to the people in order to get them into employment
-A couple of other points

Overal conluded that it was a good thing, because the many benefits outweigh the drawbacks
(edited 12 years ago)
Reply 168
what did you do for the choropleth map for just one district?

i just did the whole thing except i only had a biro so had to do patterns....

wasnt sure how you could one district unless they were just offering oyu marks for staying in the lines...
Original post by chicken2
what did you do for the choropleth map for just one district?

i just did the whole thing except i only had a biro so had to do patterns....

wasnt sure how you could one district unless they were just offering oyu marks for staying in the lines...


I used chloropleth but only did the one district....just put a key at the side and my 51-60 deaths was horizontal stripes so i just did that. Seems quite strange for 4 marks though as i did what they said but it was hardly any work tbh.
Reply 170
Original post by Aodhán
Send me your email.


You are an absolute hero, I'd of failed that exam if it wasn't for you. Much love!! :smile:

Original post by economics41
I used chloropleth but only did the one district....just put a key at the side and my 51-60 deaths was horizontal stripes so i just did that. Seems quite strange for 4 marks though as i did what they said but it was hardly any work tbh.


I miss-read the question, spending about 20 minutes doing every district :colondollar:
Original post by Radant
You are an absolute hero, I'd of failed that exam if it wasn't for you. Much love!! :smile:



I miss-read the question, spending about 20 minutes doing every district :colondollar:


You shouldn't loose any marks as you still filled in the correct region....fingers crossed!
Reply 172
Do you think i'll get marked down for not putting in quotes from the pre-release to back up my points? :confused:
Original post by Sqphie
Do you think i'll get marked down for not putting in quotes from the pre-release to back up my points? :confused:


i'd really be surprised - especially as they encouraged us to carry out further research. i didnt put too many in, but i did put them in at times, but again i doubt it.
i was gonna use pens and pencils for the map but then i realised the paper might be scanned in as black and white so i decided to do patterns instead. I spoke out of my arse for every question though, literally, the taxpayers money question i answered in a sympathy riddled paragraph. I reckon that if i said it aloud it would have been perfect for one of those charity adverts on tv that make you feel bad and donate.
Original post by sfriday
well that was interesting! anyone else do a choropleth??


I did, I did!
Was nervous at first when seeing the first question (bad memories of pie charts from January's Belfast paper - ugh), and thought I'd read the question extra carefully to understand. Noticed that it said figure 1 in the title, so had a glance at the diagram and knew I had to do a chloropleth map. I left it out and did all the questions, and went back to it and did a little colouring in time at the end. :3
Original post by goerigi
i really thought this exam was decent :smile: there werent any obscure questions either :biggrin: did anyone here write about scuba rice?



I did. Since my teacher put so much of a stress on it, I thought I should mention it or fear his wrath. :biggrin:
Original post by andynejad
what did people put for the uk taxpayers one?



Taxpayers? Talked about random things e.g. Medical care, stress on food in UK, migration and future costs for refugees, benefits of advanced societies producing less reliant society e.g. fewer costs in the long term. Education, resolving issues and how increasing education and flood defences etc. will decrease the need for migration causing no strains on housing, food, employment in the UK.
I wrote a bit more, but I forget easily.
Was it just me or did people find that a lot better than January? Finally AQA got something right!
It was very open to whatever, and your own background came in useful. In past papers I have found that sometimes this unit appears more like a maths paper than an actual Geography one! Spearman rank, pie charts. Will admit, didn't despise question one.

I've always called that map a "chloropleth map", apparently I'm wrong. (':
Also, missed out the map question and website one to begin with (thought I'd crack on with the longer ones first), so tackled the 10 marker. Upon finishing it I thought I'd done the most difficult question, so moved on to the next, a 15 marker. Did the same thing, 15 marker again? First time I've seen that, but I particularly liked those questions, because they were very much down to individual research. In study leave, people sitting 4B came in to revise that, guess it paid off because everyone understood it and felt it went well.

At the end I went back to the maps (and website question) and had a little colouring in time. I didn't realise you only needed to do one region, it seemed too little for 4 marks, so I did the whole thing, key and all. I had 30 minutes left at the end anyway, so filled it out by doing that and writing 15 markers even more in the bits where it tells you to turn over or that it's the end of the question. I feel sorry for the person marking my exam, my writing is TINY, let alone by doing that, my bad!
Reply 179
Original post by lizolove
Was it just me or did people find that a lot better than January? Finally AQA got something right!
It was very open to whatever, and your own background came in useful. In past papers I have found that sometimes this unit appears more like a maths paper than an actual Geography one! Spearman rank, pie charts. Will admit, didn't despise question one.

I've always called that map a "chloropleth map", apparently I'm wrong. (':
Also, missed out the map question and website one to begin with (thought I'd crack on with the longer ones first), so tackled the 10 marker. Upon finishing it I thought I'd done the most difficult question, so moved on to the next, a 15 marker. Did the same thing, 15 marker again? First time I've seen that, but I particularly liked those questions, because they were very much down to individual research. In study leave, people sitting 4B came in to revise that, guess it paid off because everyone understood it and felt it went well.

At the end I went back to the maps (and website question) and had a little colouring in time. I didn't realise you only needed to do one region, it seemed too little for 4 marks, so I did the whole thing, key and all. I had 30 minutes left at the end anyway, so filled it out by doing that and writing 15 markers even more in the bits where it tells you to turn over or that it's the end of the question. I feel sorry for the person marking my exam, my writing is TINY, let alone by doing that, my bad!


Lol that's good, I love that you decided what the question asked wasn't worth the marks it allocated, so you did your own :tongue: :biggrin:

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending