Should we all face the fact non STEM subjects are inferior to STEM

Any A level students going on about Physics is maths should keep quiet. Physics is NOT mathematics.

Posted from TSR Mobile

Get a life. Without non STEM subjects, we wouldn't appreciate Shakespeare, Dosteovsky, Nietzche, Da Vinci or Keynes/Friedmann. And these are just a few.

Unless you've studied both to degree level, how would you know?
edit: I'll tell you for sure in a few years.

Get a life. Without non STEM subjects, we wouldn't appreciate Shakespeare, Dosteovsky, Nietzche, Da Vinci or Keynes/Friedmann. And these are just a few.

My degree has Physics and Mathematics courses

Posted from TSR Mobile

Are you studying it currently or an applicant?

And without STEM you wouldn't be typing up your rubbish on TSR!

Posted from TSR Mobile

Oh, so anyone who appreciates the contribution that non STEM subjects have made to humanity is talking rubbish are they? We got a genius over here.

I don't agree, but what i do know is that this hierarchy is created within schools, in my school anyway, we have one art classroom, one textiles and one cooking, it's a small corridor, then the humanities corridor is split into R.E. and sociology/psychology/GCSE and lower school stuff - the science corridor is the same size as that mixed one except all the classrooms are dedicated to science, it could be something to do with the popularity of the subjects, but again why? Because we've subconsciously told that STEM subjects are more clever and important than non STEM subjects. I personally am good at science subjects, have been throughout high school, GCSEs and now A levels i do well, but i have started to break out of this cycle that i need to do STEM subjects to be clever, and that's why i do History, and although Psychology is a science, many don't see it that way, so i guess it counts for that too - also it makes people who don't do these subjects seem stupid, but they're not, they're clever too, it's just that kids who don't try as hard in school gravitate towards those subjects a) because there's a lot more coursework on that side, but also because they think those are the 'doss' subjects

Firstly, psychology is NOT a science. Social Sciences are NOT real sciences.

Anyway, not all people who do humanities or arts or social sciences are dumb or not competent to do STEM, some just prefer non-STEM nust because they like it more.

With that said, not because there are smart people doing non-STEM makes the work or the competence required to complete both equal.

Posted from TSR Mobile

Well, it is described as the scientific study of the mind, and where sociology is BA at university, psychology is a BSc, however when sociology is done in combination with psychology then it's considered a BA, so there's both aspects of it.

But yeah i agree, i don't think people who do non-STEM are dumb, and ok i just think it depends on individual differences how difficult a subject is

Well, it is described as the scientific study of the mind, and where sociology is BA at university, psychology is a BSc, however when sociology is done in combination with psychology then it's considered a BA, so there's both aspects of it.

But yeah i agree, i don't think people who do non-STEM are dumb, and ok i just think it depends on individual differences how difficult a subject is

Yes they can be geniuses, in respect to their field. That is the pertinent information right there.

Numbers of revolution?

Newton revolutionised Mathematics, Physics, Engineering.

Shakespeare revolutionised language and poetry

Tolkien revolutionised high fantasy literature

Einstein revolutionised the understanding of large bodies (like planets)

What has Karl Marx revolutionised? Defining capitalism? Writing down what was before his eyes using jargon? Hardly a genius. And when this debate become about geniuses anyway?

Posted from TSR Mobile

Don't really have an opinion on this thread as a whole but I suspect the poster may have been referring to the revolutions involving ....ya know... people... There have been one or two.

P.S. to the mathematics physics people
mathematics is the language through which you express something
and physics is how you understand the workings of the world through the language of mathematics