The Student Room Group

AQA Physics PHYA5 - Thursday 18th June 2015 [Exam Discussion Thread]

Scroll to see replies

Original post by Emmanuel12344
It's said moving so elastic collisions and random motion


is ' obeys newtonian mechanics ' an answer?
Original post by SuperMushroom
Oh I can't remember exactly it was pretty small in comparison to the radius of the sun, that's all I remember


Posted from TSR Mobile


Yeah it was approx 1.5 times radius of the earth
Unofficial Mark Scheme?
Original post by Emmanuel12344
It's said moving so elastic collisions and random motion


Yeah I put no interaction between the particles (which means the same as elastic collisions) and also Brownian motion
For the motion question I said

Molecules are moving randomly

Molecules are moving in all directions in the x y z planes


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by DomRauba
is ' obeys newtonian mechanics ' an answer?


It should if it's about the molecules motions
Original post by SuperMushroom
For the motion question I said

Molecules are moving randomly

Molecules are moving in all directions in the x y z planes


Posted from TSR Mobile


surely thats the same thing worded differently
Original post by rohan9777
I meant for the radius of the star, what did everyone get?


Something like 2 orders of magnitude less than the sun's radius. It wasn't exactly 2 orders less but I had it *10^6 rather than *10^8.
Original post by DomRauba
surely thats the same thing worded differently


No there is a subtle difference I believe haha


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by chizz1889
Yeah I put no interaction between the particles (which means the same as elastic collisions) and also Brownian motion


Brownian motion refers to a different phenomenon, I think.
Original post by chizz1889
We can argue this all day haha but yeah I agree with your last paragraph. However electrostatic force is a type of electromagnetic force but all electromagnetic forces aren't electrostatic forces as it's not always a static field. Do u get what I'm trying to say now?


That's agreeing with me :lol:

I hope I didn't seem particularly angry or anything haha.

AQA may in fact not allow "electromagnetic" but that would be ****ing stupid :tongue:
Original post by StarvingAutist
Something like 2 orders of magnitude less than the sun's radius. It wasn't exactly 2 orders less but I had it *10^6 rather than *10^8.


9.5*10 ^6 ring any bells?
Original post by StarvingAutist
Brownian motion refers to a different phenomenon, I think.


Nope it refers to motion of gas particles in an ideal gas


Posted from TSR Mobile
I think I may have put electromagnetic repulsion instead of force because I was thinking of the alpha particles being repelled by the nucleus so I wrote repulsion by accident instead of force -.- would that still be valid for a mark? :/


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by SuperMushroom
No there is a subtle difference I believe haha


Posted from TSR Mobile


:biggrin:DDD
Original post by DomRauba
9.5*10 ^6 ring any bells?


Yeah, there was definitely a 9 before the point.
Original post by StarvingAutist
Brownian motion refers to a different phenomenon, I think.


No Brownian motion is the concept of random motion of particles (in the a level spec it is anyway)
Any idea for the grade boundary? The applied one.
Original post by MangoFreak
That's agreeing with me :lol:

I hope I didn't seem particularly angry or anything haha.

AQA may in fact not allow "electromagnetic" but that would be ****ing stupid :tongue:


It kind of is :wink: the only point i'm arguing is that there is a slight difference between the two, all humans are mammals, but not all mammals are humans. That kinda concept! Lol
(edited 8 years ago)
Original post by DomRauba
9.5*10 ^6 ring any bells?


yeah it had the samish radius of a earth hence a white dwarf

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending