Teenage girl 'made up' migrant rape claim that outraged Germany

Well how many convictions have there been?



This one did.

Well it's not in my view the word has different meanings

So you are basing your standard of proof against the number of convictions

Yes this one did we acknowledge that but is your argument really because of this one example all other examples must also be false?

What is your definition of the word whore?

Well unless you've got a better way?

No, I don't believe I've said anything like that.

Disgusting word to use.

Yes I tend to take the victims word after all given the number of rapes we know happen vs the number of prosecutions it would seem we have proof that the are hardly any happening

Your insinuations are clear for all to see

Well it's not in my view the word has different meanings

That this may not be an isolated case? Seems reasonable, no?

No not really

I can see why some would want this to be the case but no not a reasonable attitude at all.

A thirteen-year-old girl has been called a 'racist whore', a 'slut' and a 'twisted bitch' in this thread. Whatever she's done, this language towards a pubescent girl is vile.

Why not?

Because a false rape accusation isn't as bad as if there really had been a rape?

Nothing un justified about those titles, deserves everyone.

Sorry I don't know how I can explain it to you why believing someone who has been sexuality assaulted until proven otherwise is the right stance to take.

So we assume the accused is guilty until proven otherwise?

A thirteen-year-old girl with mental issues 'deserves' to be called a racist whore, a slut and a twisted bitch. I see you're as delightful as ever.

This is what I was wondering.


It's very easy to dehumanise her as a racist or a charlatan, but she could just as well be someone who suffers from mental illness.

In my opinion, those people who are going crazy calling for her blood, insulting her, might not be rapists or rape-apologists, but they sure are showing a level of empathy which makes me question whether they are peaceful civilised westerners or people who would better fit in with a society based on brutal vigilante justice and revenge.

We are talking about if it is right we believe a person who claim they have been sexually assaulted?

As I said I don't know how I can explain it to you why believing someone who has been sexuality assaulted until proven otherwise is the right stance to take.

If we automatically believe any person claiming to have been sexually assaulted aren't we also assuming the guilt of anyone accused of it too?