AS AQA Geography GEOG1 17th and GEOG2 20th May 2016

2 settlements bro, so two parts of a city -__----

Aah Shite

On the population 15 marker I rushed it and accidentally wrote about migration in two contrasting areas and how this affects these areas- I wrote about services shutting down etc which I guess is social welfare but then I wrote about pollution and waste in the areas
and about general overcrowding. All these do impact humans in a way but I'm not sure if it will count as 'social welfare', anyone know if I would get any marks for this?

I did exactly the same as you for the Uganda question, explaining what it was like in the diagram and then saying how it would change, but not giving specific stages. I think I mentioned that in stage 4/5 if it ever reached it then it may have an ageing population.
For the Antarctica question, I talked about issues such as sealing and also the fishing that goes on and the vast amount of krill being taken. I also talked about the tourism and the Scott Polar Research Institute that looked at the negative effects of the tourism. I did think the question was worded weirdly too but it seems that what you put would definitely answer the question well.
For the malnutrition one I only talked about LDCs (forgot it occurs in MDCs too!), so my whole answer was based around poverty, and that 80% of Ethiopians rely on agriculture and if due to disaster or drought these crops fail they cant feed themselves. I used the 1984-5 and 2000 case study. Yours sounds right too!
I agree on the glacial map question, i had absolutely no idea what it showed and put exactly what you did about it changing direction (after I'd studied it for 5 minutes trying to work it out!)

didn't do your other units, but obvs i did population! I said the pyramid was stage 1, if you look it up it looks more like stage one but yeah i first described it and then went on to say as the country gets more developed (i.e. education of women) the birth rate would fall so the pyramid would become narrower on the bottom, but yah dunno whether that was right

Please someone reply in really worried I've mucked it up.

if your areas were contrasting then im pretty sure you shall get some marks, however not the top bands. Talking about pollution is relevant im pretty sure, as long as you did link it to higher density levels in the city. In my answer for this question, i talked about ethnicity, transport and the types of housing.

Also for the Antartica Q, as it was more about the issues with it being used etc i just started off by talking about tourism uses as they arrive by boat etc and issues can arise by damage to flora/fauna, oil spillages like HS Explorer etc and how delecate the ecosystem is blah blah but then i started to say something like "however there are treaties to manage this to help preserve eg the Atlantic Treaty 1969 which is mandatory and signed by 45 countries etc and then said about the IAATO and described that alittle. But then i started to think i wasnt answering the Q so i said however the IAATO is voluntary so tour oporators may not follow this which could damage the wilderness etc (even though most do but didnt say that haha). Then thought i'd chuck in the Madrid protocol and how in 2048 it could be over turned threatening mining to take place etc.. Does this all sound okay? Wasn't too sure if it answered the Q as i thought the angle was abit
wierd!!

Dw im sure u picked up marks in the other part forget about it its done

Um CHD is it's not a disease......

Are you referring to the Essex casestudy? i talked about how Essex was doing managed retreat and marshland recreation. So i mentioned a bit how thr marshland formed and how it was sustainable, cheap, efficent stopped coastal squeeze and would only need to be looked at again in about 100 years time to stop the salt marsh from continuously retreating into an Urban area. Oh and how Amersham Farm needed compensating.