BREXIT was based on Racism
Now that May is banning the immigration the true meaning of BREXIT is revealed.
(1) Racism against the Muslim refugees and Syrians fleeing the war (BREXIT will not stop this? but the LEAVE voters think it will happen)
(2) Racisms against the Eastern Europeans etc. like people like me from Poland who benefit your economy. A Brit will not do a job as good as a Pole such as cleaning toilets, but apparently we takes the jobs.
LONDON is the best city in UK and most Londoners voted IN. They have had most immigrants in UK, Muslim, Poles, Russian. So what does that tell u about immigration?
(1) Racism against the Muslim refugees and Syrians fleeing the war (BREXIT will not stop this? but the LEAVE voters think it will happen)
(2) Racisms against the Eastern Europeans etc. like people like me from Poland who benefit your economy. A Brit will not do a job as good as a Pole such as cleaning toilets, but apparently we takes the jobs.
LONDON is the best city in UK and most Londoners voted IN. They have had most immigrants in UK, Muslim, Poles, Russian. So what does that tell u about immigration?
Scroll to see replies
It's not banning immigration.
Original post by ILoveVoe
LONDON is the best city in UK
Wrong.
Original post by memesherrif101
It's not banning immigration.
Then how is it changed?
Original post by Willy Pete
Wrong.
Lmao. Please nominate
Original post by ILoveVoe
Lmao. Please nominate
Edinburgh is much nicer.
I don't think it was racism so much as nativism. Sure, sometimes that materialises as racism, but that's just one aspect.
Original post by anarchism101
I don't think it was racism so much as nativism. Sure, sometimes that materialises as racism, but that's just one aspect.
Most nativists (e.g. EDL) are racist, though
Original post by ILoveVoe
Most nativists (e.g. EDL) are racist, though
I'm not disagreeing, but I think racism is merely a manifestation, rather than the core.
London is over populated, filled with poverty, polluted, filled with crime so it's far from the best city unless you're a banker. Many people in London are immigrants or young students hence their acceptance of open immigration.
Be clear about this, no one campaigned against immigration people campaigned against open immigration. We don't want invisible borders, we don't want to take people in because they can just cross a channel and suddenly it's their right, we don't want people who move here for the sake of abusing the system. We want people who are educated and willing to commit, we want to ensure safety, we want to protect our system. Freedom of movement was never designed to benefit the UK, it was designed to benefit Germany and later went on to benefit the eastern block. Yes we will take in immigrants but they should be subject to British laws when being able to enter/move here.
I wish people would stop saying this is far right, it's racism, blah blah. Sadly we need boarders, there's nothing wrong with enforcing them, effective boarders would lead to less racism in my opinion. There comes a point where you think, this policy isn't helping our system. I have nothing against immigration but it should not be in the 100,000's per year. There will be no mass deportation, there will be no ban on immigration it will simply be a controlled number so we can cope.
Be clear about this, no one campaigned against immigration people campaigned against open immigration. We don't want invisible borders, we don't want to take people in because they can just cross a channel and suddenly it's their right, we don't want people who move here for the sake of abusing the system. We want people who are educated and willing to commit, we want to ensure safety, we want to protect our system. Freedom of movement was never designed to benefit the UK, it was designed to benefit Germany and later went on to benefit the eastern block. Yes we will take in immigrants but they should be subject to British laws when being able to enter/move here.
I wish people would stop saying this is far right, it's racism, blah blah. Sadly we need boarders, there's nothing wrong with enforcing them, effective boarders would lead to less racism in my opinion. There comes a point where you think, this policy isn't helping our system. I have nothing against immigration but it should not be in the 100,000's per year. There will be no mass deportation, there will be no ban on immigration it will simply be a controlled number so we can cope.
(edited 7 years ago)
Original post by ILoveVoe
Now that May is banning the immigration the true meaning of BREXIT is revealed.
(1) Racism against the Muslim refugees and Syrians fleeing the war (BREXIT will not stop this? but the LEAVE voters think it will happen)
(2) Racisms against the Eastern Europeans etc. like people like me from Poland who benefit your economy. A Brit will not do a job as good as a Pole such as cleaning toilets, but apparently we takes the jobs.
LONDON is the best city in UK and most Londoners voted IN. They have had most immigrants in UK, Muslim, Poles, Russian. So what does that tell u about immigration?
(1) Racism against the Muslim refugees and Syrians fleeing the war (BREXIT will not stop this? but the LEAVE voters think it will happen)
(2) Racisms against the Eastern Europeans etc. like people like me from Poland who benefit your economy. A Brit will not do a job as good as a Pole such as cleaning toilets, but apparently we takes the jobs.
LONDON is the best city in UK and most Londoners voted IN. They have had most immigrants in UK, Muslim, Poles, Russian. So what does that tell u about immigration?
What do you mean the true meaning it was one of the main aspects of the debate also we don't need more cleaners and Polish people are the same race as most British people
Original post by ILoveVoe
Now that May is banning the immigration the true meaning of BREXIT is revealed.
(1) Racism against the Muslim refugees and Syrians fleeing the war (BREXIT will not stop this? but the LEAVE voters think it will happen)
(2) Racisms against the Eastern Europeans etc. like people like me from Poland who benefit your economy. A Brit will not do a job as good as a Pole such as cleaning toilets, but apparently we takes the jobs.
LONDON is the best city in UK and most Londoners voted IN. They have had most immigrants in UK, Muslim, Poles, Russian. So what does that tell u about immigration?
(1) Racism against the Muslim refugees and Syrians fleeing the war (BREXIT will not stop this? but the LEAVE voters think it will happen)
(2) Racisms against the Eastern Europeans etc. like people like me from Poland who benefit your economy. A Brit will not do a job as good as a Pole such as cleaning toilets, but apparently we takes the jobs.
LONDON is the best city in UK and most Londoners voted IN. They have had most immigrants in UK, Muslim, Poles, Russian. So what does that tell u about immigration?
Mmmm ok. If thats your view (its wrong), then I guess youd better hope the negotiations go well or people will start being asked to leave. Meanwhile in the real world.....
''LONDON is the best city in UK and most Londoners voted IN. They have had most immigrants in UK, Muslim, Poles, Russian. So what does that tell u about immigration?''
40-50% of London is white/British. So of course they voted in because the vast majority of those who are not white will have voted in because they want more people from their nationality. I've seen that being thrown about but the reality is... what do you expect when 50% are not white or share much British heritage?
Now I voted remain... but that point is not relevant to the argument. I think the only negative of immigration is when people don't integrate... and when immigration happens in large quantities it comes with negative social impacts.
40-50% of London is white/British. So of course they voted in because the vast majority of those who are not white will have voted in because they want more people from their nationality. I've seen that being thrown about but the reality is... what do you expect when 50% are not white or share much British heritage?
Now I voted remain... but that point is not relevant to the argument. I think the only negative of immigration is when people don't integrate... and when immigration happens in large quantities it comes with negative social impacts.
(edited 7 years ago)
Original post by ILoveVoe
Now that May is banning the immigration the true meaning of BREXIT is revealed.
(1) Racism against the Muslim refugees and Syrians fleeing the war (BREXIT will not stop this? but the LEAVE voters think it will happen)
(1) Racism against the Muslim refugees and Syrians fleeing the war (BREXIT will not stop this? but the LEAVE voters think it will happen)
muslism aren't a race*
are malaysians the same race as arabs?
are pakistanis the same race as somalis?
etc
no racial discrimination. just a stereotypical generalisation, from you.
(2) Racisms against the Eastern Europeans etc. like people like me from Poland who benefit your economy. A Brit will not do a job as good as a Pole such as cleaning toilets, but apparently we takes the jobs.
polish isn't a race. they're white.
"a brit will not do a job as good as a pole" oh ffs if YOU think that discrimination against poles as taking jobs is racist, HOW THE **** is it not racist to say that british people are bad at doing those kinds of jobs?! how is that not racism against BRITS? :|
LONDON is the best city in UK and most Londoners voted IN. They have had most immigrants in UK, Muslim, Poles, Russian. So what does that tell u about immigration?
that the UK is more than just london and people outside of it don't necessarily want endless amounts of immigration, regardless of race?
(edited 7 years ago)
I always find it troubling that people have such a low opinion of those of us who voted a different way. I didn't vote based on racism at all. It was almost the opposite. My friends from outside the EU were sent home after Uni because of the harsh non-eu restrictions and I feel it should be an even playing field, even more so considering they have 1st/2nd class degrees from our own universities.
I also dislike the fact we can't change our own rules in regards to things like tax (tampon tax had to go through the EU... why?).
Judging by your first post I'm sure you will still see me as a racist but to be honest I've given up trying to convince people like you, You're as bad as the far right are.
I also dislike the fact we can't change our own rules in regards to things like tax (tampon tax had to go through the EU... why?).
Judging by your first post I'm sure you will still see me as a racist but to be honest I've given up trying to convince people like you, You're as bad as the far right are.
Original post by zayn008
London is over populated, filled with poverty, polluted, filled with crime so it's far from the best city unless you're a banker. Many people in London are immigrants or young students hence their acceptance of open immigration.
Be clear about this, no one campaigned against immigration people campaigned against open immigration. We don't want invisible borders, we don't want to take people in because they can just cross a channel and suddenly it's their right, we don't want people who move here for the sake of abusing the system. We want people who are educated and willing to commit, we want to ensure safety, we want to protect our system. Freedom of movement was never designed to benefit the UK, it was designed to benefit Germany and later went on to benefit the eastern block. Yes we will take in immigrants but they should be subject to British laws when being able to enter/move here.
I wish people would stop saying this is far right, it's racism, blah blah. Sadly we need boarders, there's nothing wrong with enforcing them, effective boarders would lead to less racism in my opinion. There comes a point where you think, this policy isn't helping our system. I have nothing against immigration but it should not be in the 100,000's per year. There will be no mass deportation, there will be no ban on immigration it will simply be a controlled number so we can cope.
Be clear about this, no one campaigned against immigration people campaigned against open immigration. We don't want invisible borders, we don't want to take people in because they can just cross a channel and suddenly it's their right, we don't want people who move here for the sake of abusing the system. We want people who are educated and willing to commit, we want to ensure safety, we want to protect our system. Freedom of movement was never designed to benefit the UK, it was designed to benefit Germany and later went on to benefit the eastern block. Yes we will take in immigrants but they should be subject to British laws when being able to enter/move here.
I wish people would stop saying this is far right, it's racism, blah blah. Sadly we need boarders, there's nothing wrong with enforcing them, effective boarders would lead to less racism in my opinion. There comes a point where you think, this policy isn't helping our system. I have nothing against immigration but it should not be in the 100,000's per year. There will be no mass deportation, there will be no ban on immigration it will simply be a controlled number so we can cope.
Why don't we do a Robert Mugabe, you do know what he did right??
Original post by ILoveVoe
Now that May is banning the immigration the true meaning of BREXIT is revealed.
(1) Racism against the Muslim refugees and Syrians fleeing the war (BREXIT will not stop this? but the LEAVE voters think it will happen)
(2) Racisms against the Eastern Europeans etc. like people like me from Poland who benefit your economy. A Brit will not do a job as good as a Pole such as cleaning toilets, but apparently we takes the jobs.
LONDON is the best city in UK and most Londoners voted IN. They have had most immigrants in UK, Muslim, Poles, Russian. So what does that tell u about immigration?
(1) Racism against the Muslim refugees and Syrians fleeing the war (BREXIT will not stop this? but the LEAVE voters think it will happen)
(2) Racisms against the Eastern Europeans etc. like people like me from Poland who benefit your economy. A Brit will not do a job as good as a Pole such as cleaning toilets, but apparently we takes the jobs.
LONDON is the best city in UK and most Londoners voted IN. They have had most immigrants in UK, Muslim, Poles, Russian. So what does that tell u about immigration?
Brexit was a huge multi-based issue and I cringe every time someone attempts to water it down to a single issue. The open border policy was disastrous as you can see from the terrible statistics coming our from government sources, and elsewhere. Most statistics show that 60-80% of immigrants aren't in fact refugee's at all but instead economic migrants coming to enjoy the welfare states of the UK, Germany and France, and the crime statistics are horrendous. Shouldn't a country act within its self interest? What is the issue with that. I'm sure you would be angry if we abused other countries through trade deals and illogical policy's. Which is exactly what the European Union is doing to us.
In one of May's recent speech's about Brexit she actually outlined good defenses of the UK economy and ways in which our countries could give a huge backlash to Germany and France's economies, further helped by Donald Trump's recent statement of a "good" trade deal with the UK. (Whatever that means, but I suppose it's better than a "bad" trade deal," and yeah, off topic but eh)
Quick Reply
Related discussions
- Craig Foster apologises to Sam Kerr for saying her crime was sackable
- Finally, a study to show what we all knew anyway.
- EPQ help
- a level poltics
- Racism
- Welcome to Exeter -Black students
- Lack of inclusivity for mixed races (diversity)
- When did 21st century decades culturally begin and end?
- assumed racism makes your racist
- My south Asian best friend is racist to white people
- Who regrets the outcome of Brexit??
- Should i do my epq on the 2008 financial crisis?
- westminister sixth form review
- BBC: Tory donor accused of racist remarks about Diane Abbott
- Applying to a Spanish university with A-levels from the UK
- Exchange to the UK
- Question regarding Master's tuition fees loan
- I've found St Andrews to be a racist university
- Reshuffle: David Cameron is back and Braverman sacked
- Which is better? Univeristy of reading or strathclyde?
Latest
Trending
Last reply 3 days ago
Why is the political left now censorious and authoritarian??Last reply 3 days ago
Is it true that British unis are prejudiced towards degrees from Scottish unis?Last reply 3 days ago
If the Russell Group was now a fair representation of what it still claims to beLast reply 2 weeks ago
TSR Goes Green: How important will the environment be in this year's election?Last reply 2 weeks ago
Research Rankings of universities if you add Research Quality & Intensity percentagesLast reply 1 month ago
Is University of Birmingham prestigious and respected well enough in UK ?Trending
Last reply 3 days ago
Why is the political left now censorious and authoritarian??Last reply 3 days ago
Is it true that British unis are prejudiced towards degrees from Scottish unis?Last reply 3 days ago
If the Russell Group was now a fair representation of what it still claims to beLast reply 2 weeks ago
TSR Goes Green: How important will the environment be in this year's election?Last reply 2 weeks ago
Research Rankings of universities if you add Research Quality & Intensity percentagesLast reply 1 month ago
Is University of Birmingham prestigious and respected well enough in UK ?
