Why are pro-gun supporters so unwilling to look at instances where gun control works?

Europe actually has more mass shootings than the US does.

Hard to believe,

and something I didn't believe until I looked it up.

Show me where it has worked and I'll look at the data.

Good try on the false flag tactic.

Of course, if you weren't intending to do such a thing, then you are just incredibly ignorant.

The fact that you didn't elaborate and you're being so vague shows you're talking crap.

Following the latest incident in Vegas, the gun issue in America has been brought up again, and all I ever see is Americans ranting about how gun control doesn't work. I don't understand why people who are pro gun are so unwilling to look at instances where gun control works? There are cases where gun control doesn't work, and gun control doesn't stop all violence, but there are countless instances of gun control working? Why are people not even prepared to look at those examples? How many times does something like this need to happen before America actually acknowledges their problem with guns? I know it's tied into money and the fact the government often has their hands tied on the issue, but I'm referring to every day citizens who won't even give it the time of day.

The Vegas shooting was a hoax, just as the Sandy Hook shooting was a hoax. Sandy Hook School was closed at the time of the mass shooting. The government wants gun control so that Americans cannot defend themselves against their own government. The government could not care less if Amricans are shooting each other - they want them to shoot each other, because they want to reduce the world population by 90%. The want a New World Order with them at the top and 500 million slaves.

You do realise the NRA isn’t a big political contributor financially? Their influence comes from having five million voters. As a side not they’re also calling for further regulation on bump stocks (not that it’ll mean much, they’re very easy to make yourself)

Because, fundamentally, these people believe that gun ownership should be an unfetterred right, not a privilege under the purview of the state.

You really need to take your tinfoil hat off kid

Quite ironic considering you didn't explain how the constitution is racist (e.g giving examples of ammendments that are racist) and how this is even relevant to the discussion.

To be fair the NRA does put a lot of money into the political system and that's one of the problems about the US system. Because unlike here the candidates don't get funding from their parties they need money to campaign. They make deals with politicians that if they vote on bills in favour of firearms sales etc they will give them money. So it creates a never ending cycle where nothing gets done

Following the latest incident in Vegas, the gun issue in America has been brought up again, and all I ever see is Americans ranting about how gun control doesn't work. I don't understand why people who are pro gun are so unwilling to look at instances where gun control works? There are cases where gun control doesn't work, and gun control doesn't stop all violence, but there are countless instances of gun control working? Why are people not even prepared to look at those examples? How many times does something like this need to happen before America actually acknowledges their problem with guns? I know it's tied into money and the fact the government often has their hands tied on the issue, but I'm referring to every day citizens who won't even give it the time of day.

The second amendment was created in a time where :
a) Guns were less powerful and took like 30 seconds to reload
b) America had more threats and citizens were less united.
c) Shooting black people wasn't a big deal
America has (mostly) moved away on this, guns are now very powerful and easy to reload and therefore are significantly more deadly and harder to stop.
Its an outdated idea.

The First Ammendment was created at a time before the internet and before the ideologically based horrors of the 20th century. Does that make IT outdated?

Following the latest incident in Vegas, the gun issue in America has been brought up again, and all I ever see is Americans ranting about how gun control doesn't work. I don't understand why people who are pro gun are so unwilling to look at instances where gun control works? There are cases where gun control doesn't work, and gun control doesn't stop all violence, but there are countless instances of gun control working? Why are people not even prepared to look at those examples? How many times does something like this need to happen before America actually acknowledges their problem with guns? I know it's tied into money and the fact the government often has their hands tied on the issue, but I'm referring to every day citizens who won't even give it the time of day.

The second amendment was created in a time where :
a) Guns were less powerful and took like 30 seconds to reload
b) America had more threats and citizens were less united.
c) Shooting black people wasn't a big deal
America has (mostly) moved away on this, guns are now very powerful and easy to reload and therefore are significantly more deadly and harder to stop.
Its an outdated idea.

I suggest you do a bit of research because your belief on the firearms that existed at the time the second amendment was written is so wrong. I suggest looking up the Girandoni air rifle, the puckle gun, the nock gun and even the repeating crossbow could fire at a much higher rate than you said above

First this is only about one point there ans yes okay 30 sexond may be an exageration, but only slightly, but here we go.
Okay so lets do some history.
second amendement was 1791
Silencers were early 1902
The Girandoni rifle you mentioned was very delicate and you needed training to use it , made in 1779 yes but in Austria for their military and it was very expensive, there were repeating weapons but they were not commonly owned.
I am not a gun expert though and while the guns may have been decent technolgy has 'improved', like the silencer. Also as said before america has less need for guns.