I think there's a problem with the IS LM model and how it relates to AD/AS and I 'd like to know your opinions
So we know the LM graph plots the relationship between interest rate i and output Y.
Therefore the correlation exists between the two and would be a MUTUAL correlation if the rules of statistics are to be respected.
So we know that if AD (Y) increases, this causes a rise in demand for money, provided money supply stays constant, this will result in a rise in i and as well as a rise in Y (since the rise in Md will presumably lead to rise in Consumption and or investment).
hence this follows the upward sloping LM curve, and so the reverse should be true: that a rise in i will lead to a rise in Y.
But exactly how does this happen, a rise in i should not lead to a rise in I as, borrowing costs become more expensive, the I equation tends to confirm: I (Y, i), with i being negatively related to I, so i up , I down.
It's true that this model is hopelessly outdated but let's stick within the confines of academia for the moment.
So, ladies and gents your views please.
You are Here:
Home
> Forums
>< Study Help
>< Social Science and Social Care Academic Help
>< Business and management exams and study help

IS/LM oudated and flawed ? watch
 1
 2

Zenomorph
 Follow
 6 followers
 3 badges
 Send a private message to Zenomorph
 Thread Starter
Offline3ReputationRep: Follow
 1
 31122012 19:19

Revision help in partnership with Birmingham City University

Zenomorph
 Follow
 6 followers
 3 badges
 Send a private message to Zenomorph
 Thread Starter
Offline3ReputationRep: Follow
 2
 31122012 21:21
no one ?

chelseafan
 Follow
 12 followers
 21 badges
 Send a private message to chelseafan
Offline21ReputationRep: Follow
 3
 31122012 21:25
It's new years eve, lighten up.

 Follow
 4
 31122012 22:36
(Original post by Zenomorph)
I think there's a problem with the IS LM model and how it relates to AD/AS and I 'd like to know your opinions
So we know the LM graph plots the relationship between interest rate i and output Y.
Therefore the correlation exists between the two and would be a MUTUAL correlation if the rules of statistics are to be respected.
So we know that if AD (Y) increases, this causes a rise in demand for money, provided money supply stays constant, this will result in a rise in i and as well as a rise in Y (since the rise in Md will presumably lead to rise in Consumption and or investment).
hence this follows the upward sloping LM curve, and so the reverse should be true: that a rise in i will lead to a rise in Y.
But exactly how does this happen, a rise in i should not lead to a rise in I as, borrowing costs become more expensive, the I equation tends to confirm: I (Y, i), with i being negatively related to I, so i up , I down.
It's true that this model is hopelessly outdated but let's stick within the confines of academia for the moment.
So, ladies and gents your views please.
2. Then you say because of 1. B implies A
This is wrong logic. 
The Polymath
 Follow
 78 followers
 16 badges
 Send a private message to The Polymath
 PS Helper
Offline16ReputationRep:PS Helper Follow
 5
 31122012 22:39
(Original post by danny111)
1. You said A implies B
2. Then you say because of 1. B implies A
This is wrong logic. 
 Follow
 6
 31122012 22:43
(Original post by The Polymath)
To be fair the graph says it though. If the graph is upwards sloping, it doesn't matter which variable you increase, the other should also increase, otherwise the graph is not a graph. A graph is not a one way implication, hence the equals sign
Your scenario implicitly assumes endogeneity (this is an issue in estimating demand and supply curves, the standard textbook example of endogeneity)
* what i mean is the way the LM curve works is, if there is higher Y there is more money demand but real money supply is fixed, so to lower it again you need a higher r. The logic goes one way here. 
Zenomorph
 Follow
 6 followers
 3 badges
 Send a private message to Zenomorph
 Thread Starter
Offline3ReputationRep: Follow
 7
 01012013 07:56
(Original post by danny111)
The variable on the yaxis is the dependent variable and the variable on the xaxis is the independent variable*.
Your scenario implicitly assumes endogeneity (this is an issue in estimating demand and supply curves, the standard textbook example of endogeneity)
* what i mean is the way the LM curve works is, if there is higher Y there is more money demand but real money supply is fixed, so to lower it again you need a higher r. The logic goes one way here.
Anyway, my question (logic) is one way: how does a rise in i (yes use i please, follow the graph for consistency) cause a rise in Y ? 
 Follow
 8
 01012013 11:09
(Original post by Zenomorph)
Are you sure about this? can I have some sources for your claims because endogenous or not like polymath says graphs are graphs and correlation is correlation, and this is reciprocal.
Anyway, my question (logic) is one way: how does a rise in i (yes use i please, follow the graph for consistency) cause a rise in Y ?
ps we are not doing maths here, this is not a mathematical graph. 
 Follow
 9
 01012013 12:30
Lesson 1: correlation is not causation.

MagicNMedicine
 Follow
 56 followers
 19 badges
 Send a private message to MagicNMedicine
Offline19ReputationRep: Follow
 10
 01012013 15:37
This is just a case of finding an equilibrium point.
The ISLM model shows the rate of interest at which the goods markets and money markets come into equilibrium.
(Original post by Zenomorph)
a rise in i should not lead to a rise in I as, borrowing costs become more expensive, the I equation tends to confirm: I (Y, i), with i being negatively related to I, so i up , I down.
(Original post by Zenomorph)
So we know that if AD (Y) increases, this causes a rise in demand for money, provided money supply stays constant, this will result in a rise in i and as well as a rise in Y (since the rise in Md will presumably lead to rise in Consumption and or investment).
The point at which the two relations meet is the equilibrium.
Its the same as looking at a general supply and demand graph. If price goes up people want less, but if price goes up firms supply more....so is this counterintuitive? No, two things are moving in opposite directions and they will meet at an equilibrium point.
(Original post by Zenomorph)
So we know that if AD (Y) increases, this causes a rise in demand for money, provided money supply stays constant, this will result in a rise in i and as well as a rise in Y
What is causing this rise in AD in your example in the first place?
If you are talking about combining the ISLM and ASAD then the increase in AD will have come from either a shifting out of the IS curve (which will raise interest rates) or a shifting down of the LM curve (which will lower interest rates).
If the increase in AD is being caused by a shifting down of the LM curve then this is a monetary expansion. The money supply is being increased, so its not a case of money supply staying constant.
So I assume you are meaning AD is being increased by a shifting out of the IS curve, which will raise interest rates. The IS curve will intersect the LM curve at a higher interest rate. The ISLM shows the interest rate at which the goods market and money market come into equilibrium. As you have correctly said, when income rises, money demand rises. In the absence of a change in money supply, this means the interest rate that brings the money market into equilibrium will be higher as the interest rate is the price of money that brings money supply into equilibrium with money demand. 
Zenomorph
 Follow
 6 followers
 3 badges
 Send a private message to Zenomorph
 Thread Starter
Offline3ReputationRep: Follow
 11
 01012013 20:46

Zenomorph
 Follow
 6 followers
 3 badges
 Send a private message to Zenomorph
 Thread Starter
Offline3ReputationRep: Follow
 12
 01012013 20:49
(Original post by MagicNMedicine)
This is just a case of finding an equilibrium point.
The ISLM model shows the rate of interest at which the goods markets and money markets come into equilibrium.
Correct, this is why the IS curve is downward sloping.
Correct, this is why the LM curve is upward sloping.
The point at which the two relations meet is the equilibrium.
Its the same as looking at a general supply and demand graph. If price goes up people want less, but if price goes up firms supply more....so is this counterintuitive? No, two things are moving in opposite directions and they will meet at an equilibrium point.
What is causing this rise in AD in your example in the first place?
If you are talking about combining the ISLM and ASAD then the increase in AD will have come from either a shifting out of the IS curve (which will raise interest rates) or a shifting down of the LM curve (which will lower interest rates).
If the increase in AD is being caused by a shifting down of the LM curve then this is a monetary expansion. The money supply is being increased, so its not a case of money supply staying constant.
So I assume you are meaning AD is being increased by a shifting out of the IS curve, which will raise interest rates. The IS curve will intersect the LM curve at a higher interest rate. The ISLM shows the interest rate at which the goods market and money market come into equilibrium. As you have correctly said, when income rises, money demand rises. In the absence of a change in money supply, this means the interest rate that brings the money market into equilibrium will be higher as the interest rate is the price of money that brings money supply into equilibrium with money demand.
maybe but this still does not address my question:
hence this follows the upward sloping LM curve, and so the reverse should be true: that a rise in i will lead to a rise in Y.
But exactly how does this happen, a rise in i should not lead to a rise in I as, borrowing costs become more expensive, the I equation tends to confirm: I (Y, i), with i being negatively related to I, so i up , I down. 
 Follow
 13
 01012013 20:50
(Original post by Zenomorph)
ps. yes it is, do your homework kid
And no, it is not. You should learn some econometrics to understand this. 
MagicNMedicine
 Follow
 56 followers
 19 badges
 Send a private message to MagicNMedicine
Offline19ReputationRep: Follow
 14
 01012013 20:57
(Original post by Zenomorph)
maybe but this still does not address my question:
hence this follows the upward sloping LM curve, and so the reverse should be true: that a rise in i will lead to a rise in Y.
But exactly how does this happen, a rise in i should not lead to a rise in I as, borrowing costs become more expensive, the I equation tends to confirm: I (Y, i), with i being negatively related to I, so i up , I down.
In the ISLM an increase in output is one of two things  shift down of the LM, which would be a monetary expansion, or a shift up of the IS.
If its a shift up of the IS then it will be due to:
 fiscal expansion (increase in G)
 an exogenous increase in consumption or investment, that means the IS shifts out for a higher level of Y at all levels of i
In this case it is like a demand curve shifting out. Demand is downward sloping because Q increases as P decreases. But if you have an increase in demand, the whole curve shifts out, meaning at any given level of P, Q is higher. This is what an increase in AD represented by a shift out of the IS would be. At any level of i, Y is higher than before, but still Y will fall as i rises. 
MagicNMedicine
 Follow
 56 followers
 19 badges
 Send a private message to MagicNMedicine
Offline19ReputationRep: Follow
 15
 01012013 21:00
(Original post by Zenomorph)
hence this follows the upward sloping LM curve, and so the reverse should be true: that a rise in i will lead to a rise in Y.
The LM curve is basically a set of points at which the money market is in equilibrium. The IS curve is a set of points at which the goods market is in equilibrium. The intersection of ISLM is the point where the goods and money markets are both in equilibrium.
The ISLM model tells you what will happen to Y and i if other things happen:
 increase in government spending (IS shifts out): increase in Y and increase in i
 decrease in government spending (IS shifts in): decrease in Y and decrease in i
 monetary expansion (LM shifts down): increase in Y and decrease in i
 monetary contraction (LM shifts up): decrease in Y and increase in i 
Zenomorph
 Follow
 6 followers
 3 badges
 Send a private message to Zenomorph
 Thread Starter
Offline3ReputationRep: Follow
 16
 05012013 04:01
(Original post by danny111)
I dont believe this, I'm trying to help you and you act like a ****?
And no, it is not. You should learn some econometrics to understand this.
Sure you got GCSE maths ?
LOL 
Zenomorph
 Follow
 6 followers
 3 badges
 Send a private message to Zenomorph
 Thread Starter
Offline3ReputationRep: Follow
 17
 05012013 04:06
(Original post by MagicNMedicine)
The ISLM model does not say anywhere that a rise in i will lead to a rise in Y. You must be misinterpreting the model. The LM curve being upward sloping tells you that a higher interest rate will be needed to bring the money market (money supply/money demand) into equilibrium, as Y rises. This is because higher Y means money demand increases so the price of money (i) increases.
The LM curve is basically a set of points at which the money market is in equilibrium. The IS curve is a set of points at which the goods market is in equilibrium. The intersection of ISLM is the point where the goods and money markets are both in equilibrium.
The ISLM model tells you what will happen to Y and i if other things happen:
 increase in government spending (IS shifts out): increase in Y and increase in i
 decrease in government spending (IS shifts in): decrease in Y and decrease in i
 monetary expansion (LM shifts down): increase in Y and decrease in i
 monetary contraction (LM shifts up): decrease in Y and increase in i
Remember they are policy instruments and not objectives in themselves. 
 Follow
 18
 05012013 12:04
(Original post by Zenomorph)
You call this help ? you can't even understand a simple graph and you talk econometrics?
Sure you got GCSE maths ?
LOL
Good luck to you. You'll need it. 
MagicNMedicine
 Follow
 56 followers
 19 badges
 Send a private message to MagicNMedicine
Offline19ReputationRep: Follow
 19
 05012013 14:51
(Original post by Zenomorph)
No, you got it wrong, ISLM only explains changes in i or Y via changes in ADAS, as variables within this model they do not initiate changes in each other.
(Original post by Zenomorph)
So we know the LM graph plots the relationship between interest rate i and output Y.
Therefore the correlation exists between the two and would be a MUTUAL correlation if the rules of statistics are to be respected.
But also, a demand curve plots the relationship between price and quantity, so a correlation exists. This time it is a negative correlation.
When there is a correlation like this, for every value of one variable there exists a unique value of the other variable, and the correlation allows you to work that out. So in supply where there is a positive correlation, for every P there is an associated Q, and Q rises as P rises. With demand there is a negative correlation, so for every P there is an associated Q but Q falls as P rises. So when you are looking at an interaction between supply and demand, there will be one unique P,Q combination that satisfies both. This is equilibrium.
The ISLM is the same principle.
IS is going from i to Y. It tells you that as i increases, investment will fall, and as investment influences Y, as i increases, Y falls. So it is downward sloping like a demand curve.
LM is going from Y to i. It tells you that as Y increases, demand for money increases, and so in the absence of changes in money supply, the interest rate that brings the supply and demand of money into equilibrium increases. So as Y increases, i increases. Hence it is upward sloping like a supply curve.
At every value of i, there exists a corresponding value of Y that satisfies equilibrium in the goods market, because investment is usually financed by borrowing and lower interest rates create more investment. That set of equilibriums runs all the way along the IS curve.
At every value of Y, there exists a corresponding value of i that satisfies equilibrium in the supply and demand for money. That set of equilibriums runs all the way along the LM curve.
The goods market and money market will come into equilibrium simultaneously at a unique i,Y combination, just like demand and supply will come into equilibrium at a unique P,Q combination.
Then in the same way as exogenous shifts in demand or supply curves will change that equilibrium point, exogenous shifts in the IS or LM curves will change the equilibrium in the ISLM model. 
Zenomorph
 Follow
 6 followers
 3 badges
 Send a private message to Zenomorph
 Thread Starter
Offline3ReputationRep: Follow
 20
 19012013 13:49
(Original post by danny111)
Judging by your answer you have no clue what it even is.
Good luck to you. You'll need it.
Yeah right, that's hilarious coming someone who can't even read a graph.
I think you'll need even more luck. LOL
 1
 2

University of Liverpool

Buckinghamshire New University

Business Management with Accounting
Grimsby Institute of Further and Higher Education

Business (with Foundation Year)
Plymouth Marjon University

Business and Finance (with Foundation Year)
Buckinghamshire New University

Westminster Kingsway College

Business, Accounting and Finance (Topup)
University of Cumbria

Management (Sustainable & Ethical Business)
Canterbury Christ Church University

University of Kent

Rural Business Management (Top Up)
Cornwall College
We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.
 F1's Finest
 rayquaza17
 davros
 charco
 Gingerbread101
 Kvothe the Arcane
 TeeEff
 The Empire Odyssey
 Protostar
 TheConfusedMedic
 Notnek
 Mr M
 nisha.sri
 claireestelle
 Doonesbury
 furryface12
 Amefish
 harryleavey
 Lemur14
 brainzistheword
 Rexar
 Sonechka
 TheAnxiousSloth
 EstelOfTheEyrie
 CoffeeAndPolitics
 Changing Skies
 an_atheist
 Labrador99
 EmilySarah00
 thekidwhogames
 entertainmyfaith
 Eimmanuel