[Simple Question] Negligence Duty of Care Answering Technique [Urgent]Watch
Please help me!!
I am trying to answer a problem question. I am stating the issue => rule => apply => concluding. This is my basic structure for each issue.
I am stuck on how to state the law of duty of care. Duty of care has two aspects - duty of care in law and duty of care in fact.
If the problem question has an established legal duty situations (e.g. doctor and patient), I would state that there are two aspect of duty of care. Explain why there is a legal duty of care for patient and doctors. Explain why there is a duty of care in fact by applying the foreseeability test.
Then where do I state the neighbour principle in Donoghue v Stevenson?
If the problem question has a novel situation, I would state the duty of care has two aspects. One in law and in fact. Explain each brief. State the Caparo v Dickman modern approach for establishing duty of care. When explaining the foreseeability element I would state that this came from Donoghue v Stevenson neighbour principle.
Am I missing anything when stating the law on duty of care when using these approaches?
Please help!! Incredibly urgent thx!!
While you're waiting for an answer, did you know we have 300,000 study resources that could answer your question in TSR's Learn together section?
We have everything from Teacher Marked Essays to Mindmaps and Quizzes to help you with your work. Take a look around.
If you're stuck on how to get started, try creating some resources. It's free to do and can help breakdown tough topics into manageable chunks. Get creating now.
Not sure what all of this is about? Head here to find out more.