Teens who went 'hunting for black people' and killed black man are sent t

Two of the 3 things you mentioned are not considered to be binaries by most.

I hate those binaries!! Black/white, men/women, Muslim/non-Muslims...That's always the issue I have with the way we tackle social problems. Those are human rights issues and we should condemn such violence because it's a crime against a human being, whatever the race, gender, religion...and the people who commit such crimes should not be associated with the group that they "supposedly" belong to! (Whether Black, White, Muslim...).
On the one hand, whenever a black person or Muslim, commits a crime we immediately link this to their race/religion. On the other hand, lobby groups (special interest groups) should be more inclusive: they should quit painting white people (men mostly) as privileged monsters who want to oppress everybody. Why can't we just judge or advocate for people regardless of the above factors?

A British person I noticed cared more about the Charlie Hebdo shooting, than the Peshawar massacre of school children. Why? Because whites are for some reason more valuable. It's the same in Pakistan, people cared more for the Peshawar shooting than the Charlie Hebdo attack.

Another is the Boko Haram massacre, nobody seemed gave a ****.

I think it's absolutely disgusting that you take whatever opportunity you can to justify this twisted agenda of yours. This man has just been beaten to death in cold blood and your seriously trying to debate the semantics of the word racism ?

I feel sorry for all victims of failed inter-civilizational melting pot multiculturalism/mass immigration, indeed it is usually the minorities that suffer the most

We used to, very occasionally, but Dunblane and related gun laws put a stop to that. In Europe, there've been a number of incidents recently e.g. in France, and let's not forget Breivik

http://dailym.ai/16SW***

are sent to prison..

After seeing this being posted on Twitter,I couldn't believe it just after reading about the muslim students who were killed in North Carolina. So somebody on Twitter put up some common excuses that generally apply when a white person does this sort of thing apparent,read below:

- White terrorists are part of a “fringe.” Other terrorists are apparently mainstream.

- White terrorists are “troubled loners.”

- White terrorists are random events, like tornadoes. Other terrorists are long-running conspiracies.

- Nobody thinks white terrorists are typical of white people. But other terrorists are considered paragons of their societies

- White terrorists are alcoholics, addicts or mentally ill. Other terrorists are apparently clean-living and perfectly sane.

- White terrorists are called “gunmen.” What does that even mean? A person with a gun? Wouldn’t that be, like, everyone in the US?

before anybody calls me a racist,I am part 'white' myself.

I'm surprised they got prison.

I mean, they are white, they kill a black man ? They normally get off. Just make out that he was some huge green mile, angry black guy, claim that you was in fear for your life and normally that is enough for most white people to get off when it comes to killing a black person

This is FALSE. Something like this could happen in 2015. We have a black president!

This is FALSE. Something like this could happen in 2015. We have a black president!

What makes them terrorists? Because they shot someone? And the terrorists who attacked Charlie Hebdo shot people? Therefore shooting people is terrorism? Is that literally your line of thinking? What about the white people that get shot by white people? Or blacks by blacks? Is that terrorism because someone got shot?

What makes them terrorists? Because they shot someone? And the terrorists who attacked Charlie Hebdo shot people? Therefore shooting people is terrorism? Is that literally your line of thinking? What about the white people that get shot by white people? Or blacks by blacks? Is that terrorism because someone got shot?

In 1985, when I was the Deputy Director of the Reagan White House Task Force on Terrorism, [my working group was asked] to come up with a definition of terrorism that could be used throughout the government. We produced about six, and each and every case, they were rejected, because careful reading would indicate that our own country had been involved in some of those activities. […] After the task force concluded its work, Congress [passed] U.S. Code Title 18, Section 2331 ... the US definition of terrorism. […] one of the terms, "international terrorism," means "activities that," I quote, "appear to be intended to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination or kidnapping." […] Yes, well, certainly, you can think of a number of countries that have been involved in such activities. Ours is one of them. […] And so, the terrorist, of course, is in the eye of the beholder.

http://dailym.ai/16SW***

are sent to prison..

After seeing this being posted on Twitter,I couldn't believe it just after reading about the muslim students who were killed in North Carolina. So somebody on Twitter put up some common excuses that generally apply when a white person does this sort of thing apparent,read below:

- White terrorists are part of a “fringe.” Other terrorists are apparently mainstream.

- White terrorists are “troubled loners.”

- White terrorists are random events, like tornadoes. Other terrorists are long-running conspiracies.

- Nobody thinks white terrorists are typical of white people. But other terrorists are considered paragons of their societies

- White terrorists are alcoholics, addicts or mentally ill. Other terrorists are apparently clean-living and perfectly sane.

- White terrorists are called “gunmen.” What does that even mean? A person with a gun? Wouldn’t that be, like, everyone in the US?

before anybody calls me a racist,I am part 'white' myself.