The Cricket Society IV
Scroll to see replies
Original post by Mackay
They said he was fit a few days ago. I guess they don't want to throw him in too early and risk aggravating the injury?
Yeah, must be that. Hopefully he plays the next game.
Watched a couple of "Crickets greatest" yesterday, namely, Kallis and Donald. Brought up a few questions that I think are always an interesting debate.
Is Kallis the greatest cricketer of all time?
Should batsman walk if they're given not out incorrectly (with reference to Athers v Donald)?
Is Kallis the greatest cricketer of all time?
Should batsman walk if they're given not out incorrectly (with reference to Athers v Donald)?
Just looked at the T20 World Cup fixtures, and it seems there is only one opportunity for real embarrassment for England, and that is probably against Zimbabwe.
Original post by The Wavefunction
Watched a couple of "Crickets greatest" yesterday, namely, Kallis and Donald. Brought up a few questions that I think are always an interesting debate.
Is Kallis the greatest cricketer of all time?
Should batsman walk if they're given not out incorrectly (with reference to Athers v Donald)?
Is Kallis the greatest cricketer of all time?
Should batsman walk if they're given not out incorrectly (with reference to Athers v Donald)?
Kallis is certainly the most complete cricketer I've ever seen.
As for the latter question, I don't think they should. They should stand their ground. The onus is on the officials - NOT the players. You wouldn't get such brazen honesty in any other sport, and I don't see why cricket is seen as different and places such an emphasis on it.
Sport's about winning, at the end of the day.
Original post by Mackay
Kallis is certainly the most complete cricketer I've ever seen.
As for the latter question, I don't think they should. They should stand their ground. The onus is on the officials - NOT the players. You wouldn't get such brazen honesty in any other sport, and I don't see why cricket is seen as different and places such an emphasis on it.
Sport's about winning, at the end of the day.
As for the latter question, I don't think they should. They should stand their ground. The onus is on the officials - NOT the players. You wouldn't get such brazen honesty in any other sport, and I don't see why cricket is seen as different and places such an emphasis on it.
Sport's about winning, at the end of the day.
Seems like such an awesome bloke, as well, does Kallis. Always put side before self.
Spirit of the game and all that, though? I think if it's an obvious knick then you should walk. Less so obvious I think you have the right to stay, but if you're practically middling it then you should go
Original post by The Wavefunction
Watched a couple of "Crickets greatest" yesterday, namely, Kallis and Donald. Brought up a few questions that I think are always an interesting debate.
Is Kallis the greatest cricketer of all time?
Should batsman walk if they're given not out incorrectly (with reference to Athers v Donald)?
Is Kallis the greatest cricketer of all time?
Should batsman walk if they're given not out incorrectly (with reference to Athers v Donald)?
He's the greatest test cricketer of all time. He averages 57 with the bat, and 32 with the ball.
Just incredible, really.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by oceansiz3
He's the greatest test cricketer of all time. He averages 57 with the bat, and 32 with the ball.
Just incredible, really.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Just incredible, really.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Incredible stats.
ALSO, Kallis is one of four all-rounders to score a century and take a five-for in a Test more than once.
Original post by Mackay
Incredible stats.
ALSO, Kallis is one of four all-rounders to score a century and take a five-for in a Test more than once.
ALSO, Kallis is one of four all-rounders to score a century and take a five-for in a Test more than once.
Botham, Sobers and someone else I'm guessing?
Original post by The Wavefunction
Botham, Sobers and someone else I'm guessing?
Mushtaq Mohammad.
Original post by The Wavefunction
Watched a couple of "Crickets greatest" yesterday, namely, Kallis and Donald. Brought up a few questions that I think are always an interesting debate.
Is Kallis the greatest cricketer of all time?
Should batsman walk if they're given not out incorrectly (with reference to Athers v Donald)?
Is Kallis the greatest cricketer of all time?
Should batsman walk if they're given not out incorrectly (with reference to Athers v Donald)?
well he wasnt a better batsmen than tendulkar, a better bowler than marshal or warne or better allrounder than sobers - but he would be close to all of them
Original post by Enginerd.
IMO, Wahab and Amir could be Pakistans spearhead attack for the coming years. Amir, having been one of the best if not the best bowler in the Asia Cup obviously needs to bowl well to lose the 'cheater' tag and I think he's coping well.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Posted from TSR Mobile
Amir took a spanking from SL tho, he is entirely reliant on swinging conditions
Original post by Chakede
Amir took a spanking from SL tho, he is entirely reliant on swinging conditions
He's only just returned from his ban, give him a while. Plus, he was probably the best seamer in the tournament. He proved himself against India, critics had to applaud him for his bowling.
Posted from TSR Mobile
(edited 8 years ago)
Original post by Enginerd.
He's only just returned from his ban, give him a while. Plus, he was probably the best seamer in the tournament. He proved himself against India, critics had to applaud him for his bowling.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Posted from TSR Mobile
Agreed. Every bowler is allowed one or two off days. He will be vital in the WT20.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Australia draw level with SA in the three-match T20 series, winning off the final ball.
I actually thought SA had enough on the board (200+) to seal the series, but it was a a brilliant partnership of 161 between David Warner (77 off 40 balls) and Glenn Maxwell (75 off 43).
No idea why Australia are experimenting with Warner at four. He simply doesn't suit batting that far down the order, in truth.
SA got off to a great start in dismissing Australia for 28-2. That Rabada catch to get rid of Smith was exceptional, and with Finch/Watson failing to make double digits, I thought the writing was on the wall.
Great recovery from Australia, though.
SA will rue Rabada's bowling in that final over, and their lack of good quality fielding. There were fumbles galore. Rabada bowled two wides with Australia needing 11 from 5. Warner and Maxwell got out eventually, but fair play to Marsh and Faulkner for getting them over the line.
I actually thought SA had enough on the board (200+) to seal the series, but it was a a brilliant partnership of 161 between David Warner (77 off 40 balls) and Glenn Maxwell (75 off 43).
No idea why Australia are experimenting with Warner at four. He simply doesn't suit batting that far down the order, in truth.
SA got off to a great start in dismissing Australia for 28-2. That Rabada catch to get rid of Smith was exceptional, and with Finch/Watson failing to make double digits, I thought the writing was on the wall.
Great recovery from Australia, though.
SA will rue Rabada's bowling in that final over, and their lack of good quality fielding. There were fumbles galore. Rabada bowled two wides with Australia needing 11 from 5. Warner and Maxwell got out eventually, but fair play to Marsh and Faulkner for getting them over the line.
Dhoni is the man loool
Can't believe I was watching a debate on a Pakistani news channel where Mohammed Yousuf was advocating the return of Salman Butt into the Pakistan T20 squad - WTF.. Seems to be Pakistan's selection committee is in disarray with words and counter-words said between Afridi and whoever but just re-emphasizes my view that Pakistan will be hopeless in the World T20.
Original post by Aky786UK
Can't believe I was watching a debate on a Pakistani news channel where Mohammed Yousuf was advocating the return of Salman Butt into the Pakistan T20 squad - WTF.. Seems to be Pakistan's selection committee is in disarray with words and counter-words said between Afridi and whoever but just re-emphasizes my view that Pakistan will be hopeless in the World T20.
Lol, they can't be serious? How did he justify his decision? I'm hopeful they'll get to the Quarters but not beyond.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by Enginerd.
Lol, they can't be serious? How did he justify his decision? I'm hopeful they'll get to the Quarters but not beyond.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Posted from TSR Mobile
It seems the selectors are considering it but Afridi is against it. I imagine Butt has friends in high places to even be mentioned in the selection stakes.
Quick Reply
Related discussions
- real estate uni
- is this weird?
- Favourite societies at university
- University Sport
- Sports and Gym Facilities at Kingston
- Sport at Oxbridge
- Essex or UEA?
- What is your favorite sport to watch and play?
- commuting from west sussex to london for uni
- The Sports Hurt/heal game
- Cricket Team
- Need some guidance - Liverpool
- Law essay comp year 12
- what events did you enjoy watching on TV growing up?
- Making friends as a transfer student
- miserable at uni
- My Social life at uni is a bit dead
- I need help with IRAC question HELP
- I'm struggling to decide which accommodation to pick
- Please help!
