Where is a safe place for Muslims?

Muslims have loads of Muslim countries to go to


White people don't have ****, because for some reason people think Europe has to be a giant racial melting pot DESTROYING White people


We are right to be ****ing racist, and those traitors who support this need to be lined up and shot

RatBag appears to have become the new resident moronic apologist for islamist doctrine. ie everything is 'cultural' not the fault of islam arriving on the scene. its like Anjem Choudhury has hacked his account

It is both weird and slightly macabre, but it is in no way comparable to the mutilation of a child's genitals. What's even worse, is that the brutality is carried out by someone in a position of trust.
It is obscene and to dismiss it as "just tradition" is disgraceful.

What? Male circumcision is mutilation? Oh, poor prince Charles.. And the "brutality" was "carried out by someone in a position of trust".. Horror! Unbelievable crime!

You're missing the point. The whole idea is that tradition is forced onto a child without his consent. As in, tradition should not trump choice.

You're missing the point. The whole idea is that tradition is forced onto a child without his consent. As in, tradition should not trump choice.

What? Male circumcision is mutilation? Oh, poor prince Charles.. And the "brutality" was "carried out by someone in a position of trust"..

Horror! Unbelievable crime!

I'm not missing anything. The point of my opponent was that male circumcision is a brutal mutilation, barbaric act. Parents do many things without consent of their children. The question is if this tradition harms a baby. And the question is NO.

It is hard to believe that any civilised person with a shred of human empathy could defend the totally unnecessary slicing off of part of their child's genitals, simply to comply with supernatural instruction. It's insane!

You realise that if you cut off part of your child's ear and claimed that god told you to do it, you'd be arrested and probably sectioned, and the child likely taken into care.

I presume that you view FGM in the same lighthearted manner? If not, what's the difference?

Of course it harms the baby! It permanently deprives them of their foreskin! It causes pain during the process and discomfort while healing. There is also the risk of procedural complications and post-op infection. Children have died because of circumcision.

The argument that the foreskin is not essential to life is irrelevant. The little toe and the earlobes serve less purpose than the foreskin, yet no one would claim that removing those from a baby for no good reason was anything but barbaric mutilation.

i was talking to my racist grandmother and she believes that all Muslims should be deported from Europe.

But with ISIS taking over the Middle East, where are these moderate Muslims safe if this deportation would occur (I don't support it fyi, just saying)?

And it's exactly what Queen Elizabeth did for her sons.

You again confuse insanity with religion and traditions.

If you don't know the subject - learn it.

I'm sure that after reading your fundamental scientific considerations the medics immediately will change their minds.

Genuinely, Israel is absolutely fine as long as you aren't an extremist.

Which is why Muslim children getting shot by Israeli soldiers is a regularity nowadays

I'm not missing anything. The point of my opponent was that male circumcision is a brutal mutilation, barbaric act. Parents do many things without consent of their children. The question is if this tradition harms a baby. And the question is NO.

Where is a safe place for Whites? Not South Africa that is for sure I fled there

America is turning very anti-White

Europe too, with all these grooming gangs and anti-White violence often ignored

Where are we to go? nowhere to run.

Maybe Russia...