Is inductive reasoning superior to contradictory reasoning?

Watch
FickleMind
Badges: 2
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 3 years ago
#1
There are two methods of proof in maths and I assume it's the same for philosophy: induction and contradiction. To me contradiction is the impulse of everyone who engages in an argument, whereas inductive reasoning requires patience and thought and often leads to more significant discoveries of fact. Do you agree or disagree?
0
reply
Cherub012
Badges: 5
Rep:
?
#2
Report 3 years ago
#2
(Original post by FickleMind)
There are two methods of proof in maths and I assume it's the same for philosophy: induction and contradiction. To me contradiction is the impulse of everyone who engages in an argument, whereas inductive reasoning requires patience and thought and often leads to more significant discoveries of fact. Do you agree or disagree?
Is math induction? Induction never leads to fact.

Induction (via science) has made discoveries, and I don't think the other one has?
0
reply
FickleMind
Badges: 2
Rep:
?
#3
Report Thread starter 3 years ago
#3
(Original post by Cherub012)
Is math induction? Induction never leads to fact.

Induction (via science) has made discoveries, and I don't think the other one has?
Maths uses induction and contradiction as methods of proof. That doesn't make it either of them as much as it doesn't make me a spoon to use a spoon.

So it seems that discovery (about the natural world) is most important to you. But there are areas of science that will never be discovered due to ethics, which is a philosophical concept. Therefore science is constrained by philosophy. It seems that we should deal ourselves with the constraint and deduce its causes before we engage in the art of discovery (science).
0
reply
Cherub012
Badges: 5
Rep:
?
#4
Report 3 years ago
#4
(Original post by FickleMind)
Maths uses induction and contradiction as methods of proof. That doesn't make it either of them as much as it doesn't make me a spoon to use a spoon.

So it seems that discovery (about the natural world) is most important to you. But there are areas of science that will never be discovered due to ethics, which is a philosophical concept. Therefore science is constrained by philosophy. It seems that we should deal ourselves with the constraint and discover its causes before we engage in the art of discovery (science).
Discovery has made a larger contribution to survival.
0
reply
FickleMind
Badges: 2
Rep:
?
#5
Report Thread starter 3 years ago
#5
(Original post by Cherub012)
Discovery has made a larger contribution to survival.
survival is meaningless, there is no point to existence anymore unless we thrive. chickens, sheep, cows all survive - i'd not like to be any of them.
0
reply
artful_lounger
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#6
Report 3 years ago
#6
(Original post by Cherub012)
Discovery has made a larger contribution to survival.
That wasn't the question however.

There seems to be some confusion about mathematical induction vs inductive reasoning. Mathematical induction is actually a form of deductive reasoning. Science uses inductive reasoning based on empirical evidence.

If OP meant mathematical induction versus proof by contradiction, then that's a different question, but there isn't so much overlap with philosophy.
1
reply
Cherub012
Badges: 5
Rep:
?
#7
Report 3 years ago
#7
(Original post by FickleMind)
survival is meaningless, there is no point to existence anymore unless we thrive. chickens, sheep, cows all survive - i'd not like to be any of them.
Medical advancements for e.g. help us survive.

We want to survive. It is innate due to evolution.

(Original post by artful_lounger)
That wasn't the question however.

There seems to be some confusion about mathematical induction vs inductive reasoning. Mathematical induction is actually a form of deductive reasoning. Science uses inductive reasoning based on empirical evidence.

If OP meant mathematical induction versus proof by contradiction, then that's a different question, but there isn't so much overlap with philosophy.
Oh right. I thought this was about inductive reasoning.
0
reply
FakeNewsEditor
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#8
Report 3 years ago
#8
Contradiction? you mean deduction or deductive reasoning.
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

Current uni students - are you thinking of dropping out of university?

Yes, I'm seriously considering dropping out (87)
13.99%
I'm not sure (29)
4.66%
No, I'm going to stick it out for now (197)
31.67%
I have already dropped out (13)
2.09%
I'm not a current university student (296)
47.59%

Watched Threads

View All