1.
UCL is a top-level uni, and rejecting an offer from them without a guaranteed replacement (the Oxford offer cannot be guaranteed) is somewhat risky, although if it is your dream why not.
2.
Secondly, my opinion, being a 2nd year law student here is that the Oxford way of teaching is 99.9% self-study. Even the lectures usually do not match chronologically what you do in tutorials (ie. they are useless, at least then), because the tutorials are organized by college professors who rarely align them with the university-aligned lecture lists. Additionally, in my 2 years here, there have been very few tutorials from which I would walk out thinking that I have gained some usable knowledge. You walk in, once a week, for 60 min, having read the entire reading list and written the essay on your own and everyone expects that you are already a semi-expert in that week's content. There isn't much that you are told in those 60 min. There may be some 'guidance,' or 'essay-specific feedback,' but hardly 'teaching.'
3.
The prospect of a gap year is something to consider. Would you be able to use that time productively and come back to an academic lifestyle after a year of doing whatever else? Just a general question to consider.
1.
UCL is a top-level uni, and rejecting an offer from them without a guaranteed replacement (the Oxford offer cannot be guaranteed) is somewhat risky, although if it is your dream why not.
2.
Secondly, my opinion, being a 2nd year law student here is that the Oxford way of teaching is 99.9% self-study. Even the lectures usually do not match chronologically what you do in tutorials (ie. they are useless, at least then), because the tutorials are organized by college professors who rarely align them with the university-aligned lecture lists. Additionally, in my 2 years here, there have been very few tutorials from which I would walk out thinking that I have gained some usable knowledge. You walk in, once a week, for 60 min, having read the entire reading list and written the essay on your own and everyone expects that you are already a semi-expert in that week's content. There isn't much that you are told in those 60 min. There may be some 'guidance,' or 'essay-specific feedback,' but hardly 'teaching.'
3.
The prospect of a gap year is something to consider. Would you be able to use that time productively and come back to an academic lifestyle after a year of doing whatever else? Just a general question to consider.
Last reply 2 hours ago
Astrophoria Oxford Foundation Year 2025(Official Thread)48
379
Last reply 3 days ago
Oxford MSc Integrated Immunology 2025/2026 entry (Full-Time)Last reply 1 week ago
y12 gyg ðœ—𜚠࣪˖ ִ𙚠study journal (goal: cambridge)14
160
Last reply 1 month ago
Studying Physics at Oxford (2025) - offer holder adviceLast reply 1 month ago
Oxbridge applicants for modern languages - 2025 entry (applying in 2024)60
146