Original post by Physics EnemyWhat else is an exam meant to be on? It's either book work or spotting clever ways of answering tricky Qs (or a combo of the two). What else did he expect? I don't get why the 'best mathmo' wouldn't be able to do this like the other best students. If he can't, maybe re-think the idea of 'best'?
Working hard and ability are two different things, in short.
What do you mean by crappy knowledge? The beauty of Maths lies in solving a huge array of complex problems with relatively basic Maths, relying on intuition and ingenuity in applying it. I don't see the point of learning Maths (or anything) if you can't apply it well, and in unfamiliar situations. And indeed can't solve tricky problems using Maths you already know, or is 'easier' than the current material you know. What's the point? Doesn't make you a better Mathematician.
Yes I read it. That goes to show how hard IMO problems are, even using relatively basic Maths. It's not about material. Anyone can rote learn stuff or remember formulae. The ingenuity in applying is the real discriminator.
This doesn't make any sense. A problem is a problem, people either solve it or they don't. Hard problems have more credibility for the obvious reason that they're hard. It's not a qualitative thing. And trying to pick and choose what problems to solve is a very cheap and easy copout from running from the tough problems. In no other discipline I can think of, is there any dream in running away from the things people find hard. Tackling it is usually the aim.
Warwick students couldn't do them in a week (as the guy describes) because these types of problems are designed for the best students, and they're the ones at Cambridge and MIT, the top ones at these unis, not just the 'average' Cam Mathmo either. I think it's good though that Warwick are trying to incorporate IMO problems in their course though (if they are?). Thumbs up if true.
I see education as equipping someone with skills, so they become 'enhanced', mentally. So helping someone to think better outside the box, or developing intuition and flair, developing good insight into solving problems, clarity of thought and expression, strong focus, etc. So not really material per se, but moreso skills. I also believe in stretching and competition, hence why I have respect for those types of papers. I think a Professor (or anyone) who can't solve certain difficult Maths problems but goes on to rubbish them, is in denial.
That's learning to pass exams for the sake of passing exams. If they went on holiday for a few months, and you asked them to answer those Qs again, they wouldn't know what to do. That's called memorization, not understanding/skills.