I'm conscious that pay varies hugely at the Bar, between practice areas, sets, and individuals (even the same individual in different years), so it's notoriously hard to say much concretely about pay at the Bar. However, I'm looking for any loose rules of thumb or anecdotal evidence regarding the below, that could form the basis of some high level financial planning.
Pay is by no means my main focus, but I would like to plan my finances to the extent possible. In case relevant, my focus is on the Employment law Bar (albeit likely with some Commercial work).
My questions are:
1) What relation does the pupillage award bear to expected earnings for very junior practitioners? I assume baby juniors would generally be expected to earn more than what they were awarded during pupillage, but I don't have a sense of how much of a jump (proportionally speaking) one would expect, and I know baby juniors unlike pupils start incurring costs e.g. rent. After accounting for costs, would it be fair to assume a 30-50% increase in income for a baby junior in their first few years of practice?
2) How much less would (generally respondent-focused) employment law barristers expect to earn than their commercial and commercial/chancery counterparts, assuming similar levels of activity etc? I know they will earn less, but I don't have a sense if that means e.g. 25-30% less or more like e.g. 75% less.
3) Do very junior practitioners have scope to build their practice towards more lucrative areas of work, or is that only generally possible several years down the track?