The Student Room Group

PHYA5 ~ 20th June 2013 ~ A2 Physics

Scroll to see replies

Original post by Bobilina
Can't believe there's a thread on this already.. to be fair i'm busy concentrating on re-sitting Unit 4, the joys.

Anyone else doing the 'turning points' optional module?


yeah I'm doing it school hasn't started on it yet though, electron stuff is pretty easy, just memorising cathode ray stuff erm then there's photo-electric effect and wave particle duality and then special relativity. So it's pretty much special relativity and the odd thing here and there to look up on :smile: how's the rest of the course going ?
Original post by Bobilina
Can't believe there's a thread on this already.. to be fair i'm busy concentrating on re-sitting Unit 4, the joys.

Anyone else doing the 'turning points' optional module?



I'm doing Turning Points :h: Just about to finish it, have you started?
Original post by PhilosopherKing
yeah I'm doing it school hasn't started on it yet though, electron stuff is pretty easy, just memorising cathode ray stuff erm then there's photo-electric effect and wave particle duality and then special relativity. So it's pretty much special relativity and the odd thing here and there to look up on :smile: how's the rest of the course going ?


Sweeet, well i've heard of them considering they've cropped up in the other units so that's a good start I suppose!

The rest of the course is going quite well, I actually enjoy it which motivates me to revise and work for it. Whereas with Unit 4 I had no motivation or interest in the topics and is therefore a re-sit :frown:

Sorry for the super late reply i've been in Switzerland for 4 days... #cern
Original post by Technetium
I'm doing Turning Points :h: Just about to finish it, have you started?


Holy macaroni, we haven't even finished the first section...

:eek:
Original post by Bobilina
Holy macaroni, we haven't even finished the first section...

:eek:



Lucky you! At least you are being taught the topic. In my school it is an 'independent study' option :rolleyes: It is not that hard :smile:
(edited 11 years ago)
Original post by Technetium
Lucky you! At least you are being taught the topic. In my school it is an 'independent study' option :rolleyes: It is not that hard :smile:


Same here ! It doesn't seem too long though... Special Relativity looks disappointingly short, nothing on Space-time and stuff from what I've seen :frown:
Original post by posthumus
Same here ! It doesn't seem too long though... Special Relativity looks disappointingly short, nothing on Space-time and stuff from what I've seen :frown:



There is a little bit on the Twin Paradox, which I am finding quite confusing. I love the chapter on Newton and Huygens :smile:
Original post by Technetium
There is a little bit on the Twin Paradox, which I am finding quite confusing. I love the chapter on Newton and Huygens :smile:


Is this in the Nelson Thornes book?? I only use the Collins Revision Guide :redface:
Subbed... right now I probably know about 5% of the content. :woo:
Original post by posthumus
Is this in the Nelson Thornes book?? I only use the Collins Revision Guide :redface:


There's a Turning Points booklet that is endorsed by AQA, and that is what I am using :smile:
Has anyone got any practice questions/ worksheets on electric fields?


Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 111
Fairly silly question, but yeah...
I don't seem to understand the inverse square law with respect to gamma radiation very well? How exactly do I use I=k/r^2, as they don't give you the value of k on the data sheet?
I was doing the Summary Questions at the end of section 9.5 in the Nelson Thornes book, and got stuck on question 4 (b);
"A point source of gamma radiation is placed 200mm from the end of a Geiger tube. The corrected count rate was measured at 12.7 counts per second. Calculate the distance between the source and the tube for a corrected count rate of 20 counts per second."
The correct answer is 160mm.
Original post by Xiomara
Fairly silly question, but yeah...
I don't seem to understand the inverse square law with respect to gamma radiation very well? How exactly do I use I=k/r^2, as they don't give you the value of k on the data sheet?
I was doing the Summary Questions at the end of section 9.5 in the Nelson Thornes book, and got stuck on question 4 (b);
"A point source of gamma radiation is placed 200mm from the end of a Geiger tube. The corrected count rate was measured at 12.7 counts per second. Calculate the distance between the source and the tube for a corrected count rate of 20 counts per second."
The correct answer is 160mm.


Right, so what you first have to work out is the constant for that particular source of radiation.
So firstly, you'd do k=Ir^2 where I=12.7 and r=0.2 and you will get the constant.
The use r^2= k/I with the value of k you just calculated and the new I, 20.
Finally route that answer to get your final answer.
Hope that helps
Reply 113
Original post by Seb Hudson
Right, so what you first have to work out is the constant for that particular source of radiation.
So firstly, you'd do k=Ir^2 where I=12.7 and r=0.2 and you will get the constant.
The use r^2= k/I with the value of k you just calculated and the new I, 20.
Finally route that answer to get your final answer.
Hope that helps


Thank you so much! That's a massive help :smile:
hey guys i was just wondering how come i cant find the markschemes for section a, which is nuclear and thermal physics, if anyone can send them to me i would be really helpful.
Original post by ehtisham_1
hey guys i was just wondering how come i cant find the markschemes for section a, which is nuclear and thermal physics, if anyone can send them to me i would be really helpful.


The mark scheme for the non-optional bit (nuclear and thermal physics) is in each of the mark schemes for the optional bits. They all have Section A (nuclear and thermal physics) the same, and then the optional topic mark scheme after that.

The reason they don't publish Section A (nuclear and thermal physics) on its own is because it isn't standalone.

Hope that helps!

Edit: Obviously didn't help. :laugh:
(edited 11 years ago)
Reply 116
Can anyone please explain how to derive the pressure of an ideal gas in stupid people terms? I missed the lesson on it and the book is quite confusing :/ And does anyone know how they might ask us about it in the exam?
Original post by Xiomara
Can anyone please explain how to derive the pressure of an ideal gas in stupid people terms? I missed the lesson on it and the book is quite confusing :/ And does anyone know how they might ask us about it in the exam?


I really don't think they will ask us to derive it but I guess its good to know :smile: ...

consider a particle with 1 unit mass (m) travelling from one side of a cube (l) container to the other (therefore total distance travelled is 2l)

We know the change in momentum will be -2mv

F=-2mv/t

we know t is basically v=2l/t rearranged... t=v/2l so sub that in

F=-2mv/2l/v = -mv2/l

Pressure is force/area therefore... since you know that area is l2:

p=mv2/l3

l^3 is the same as the volume :smile: so you can rewrite it...

p=mv2/V

The total pressure will be all the pressures of each atom added up, because each will not be travelling at the same velocity...

P= mv21/V + mv22/V + mv23/V + mv24/V......
= m(v21 + v22 + v23 + v24)/V

Okay now instead of writing velocities over and over again you can put a line on top of v to indicate 'the mean squared speed'...which is basically like an average. I don't know how to do that on here so I'm just going to strike it out like so v2 :colondollar: Now you also still an N infront to indicate how many molecules you are dealing with. You should end up with this:

P=Nmv2/V

Now lets convert this from velocity to speed... speed has no direction. Since in the box the particles can go in x y or z (because its 3D :smile: ).
We will indicate speed with 'c'.

c2=v2x +v2y + v2z

Particles are like to travel in all 3 directions, therefore we can just simplify this by using the mean velocity of all three and multiplying it by 3... we will also indicate mean speed with c :colondollar:
c2 = 3v2

Now finally just sub this into your previous equation
P=Nmv2/V

you should get P=Nmc2/3V

Rearrange to make PV the subject on one side and you will get the formula you get in the exam :smile:

Times like this I really wish I knew how to use 'latex' :tongue:

Hope that helps :smile:

EDIT: Sorry I saw a slight mistake when explaining the second step, I've put the change in bold :smile:
(edited 11 years ago)
Reply 118
Original post by posthumus
I really don't think they will ask us to derive it but I guess its good to know :smile: ...

consider a particle with 1 unit mass (m) travelling from one side of a cube (l) container to the other (therefore total distance travelled is 2l)

We know the change in momentum will be -2mv

F=-2mv/t

we know t is basically v=2l/t rearranged... t=v/2l so sub that in

F=-2mv/2l/v = -mv2/l

Pressure is force/area therefore... since you know that area is l2:

p=mv2/l3

l^3 is the same as the volume :smile: so you can rewrite it...

p=mv2/V

The total pressure will be all the pressures of each atom added up, because each will not be travelling at the same velocity...

P= mv21/V + mv22/V + mv23/V + mv24/V......
= m(v21 + v22 + v23 + v24)/V

Okay now instead of writing velocities over and over again you can put a line on top of v to indicate 'the mean squared speed'...which is basically like an average. I don't know how to do that on here so I'm just going to strike it out like so v2 :colondollar: Now you also still an N infront to indicate how many molecules you are dealing with. You should end up with this:

P=Nmv2/V

Now lets convert this from velocity to speed... speed has no direction. Since in the box the particles can go in x y or z (because its 3D :smile: ).
We will indicate speed with 'c'.

c2=v2x +v2y + v2z

Particles are like to travel in all 3 directions, therefore we can just simplify this by using the mean velocity of all three and multiplying it by 3... we will also indicate mean speed with c :colondollar:
c2 = 3v2

Now finally just sub this into your previous equation
P=Nmv2/V

you should get P=Nmc2/3V

Rearrange to make PV the subject on one side and you will get the formula you get in the exam :smile:

Times like this I really wish I knew how to use 'latex' :tongue:

Hope that helps :smile:

EDIT: Sorry I saw a slight mistake when explaining the second step, I've put the change in bold :smile:


Thank you so much for putting in that effort! Makes more sense now :smile:
It did dude

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending