The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

guys what is a critical angle ? :O
Reply 681
Original post by x0x
I said that I decreases
so for a given voltage the resistance should increase
since V=IR
but its true ... when current decreases there is less heating but I depended on the equation since there were 4 marks and in mark schemes they almost always require you to quote a relevant equation :P


Considering it was a 4 mark question, I think a very long explanation should be given e.g. 671 post
Reply 682
Estimated grade boundary for an A?

Thanks.
Reply 683
Original post by Freddy-Francis
guys what is a critical angle ? :O


Angle of incidence at which angle of refraction=90*, so light travels along medium boundary.
what did u guys put for the "Explain why the following observations may be understood by using a photon model of light, rather than a wave model"?
Reply 685
What did everyone say for the q on stating EM radiation for the since plate photoelectric effect q?

I put UV for two reasons. If you know from experience UV radiation and visible light appear to be associated most with zinc. Also there was a q on radio waves frequency from before like the start of the paper, which was a small hint, from that I realised that this unknown radiation is above both visible light and radio waves in terms of frequency, so it's either UV, X-ray, gamma. Due to first reason I put down UV, I have more faith in it.
Reply 686
Original post by krisshP
Estimated grade boundary for an A?

Thanks.

im thinking 58-59
Reply 687
Original post by krisshP
What did everyone say for the q on stating EM radiation for the since plate photoelectric effect q?

I put UV for two reasons. If you know from experience UV radiation and visible light appear to be associated most with zinc. Also there was a q on radio waves frequency from before like the start of the paper, which was a small hint, from that I realised that this unknown radiation is above both visible light and radio waves in terms of frequency, so it's either UV, X-ray, gamma. Due to first reason I put down UV, I have more faith in it.

its UV since frequency was 1.04x10^15 or something and i memorized the wavelengths and this one ws 2.somethingx10^-7 which is UV
Reply 688
Original post by Freddy-Francis
what did u guys put for the "Explain why the following observations may be understood by using a photon model of light, rather than a wave model"?


It was a QWC question worth 5 marks I thin. I ended up just stating stuff like
One photon releases one electron
E=hf
Wave energy depends on frequency for particle model an on intensity for wave model
Energy supply is continuous, so can build up for wave model
....
Original post by hamzeh h
its UV since frequency was 1.04x10^15 or something and i memorized the wavelengths and this one ws 2.somethingx10^-7 which is UV


it didnt ask for specific..
It just said which part.
So i put the high end :eek:
And put examples like xrays, gamma rays :O
Reply 690
Original post by Freddy-Francis
what did u guys put for the "Explain why the following observations may be understood by using a photon model of light, rather than a wave model"?

its repeated in many pastpapers just expain about one photon giving energy to one electron and frequency being propoptional to energy..etc and that if it was a wave keeping the light shone will accumulate energy and electrons will be emitted but doesnt happen and talk about threshold frequency
Reply 691
Original post by Freddy-Francis
it didnt ask for specific..
It just said which part.
So i put the high end :eek:
And put examples like xrays, gamma rays :O

well Ultra-violet is a part of electromagnetic spectrum :P
Original post by krisshP
It was a QWC question worth 5 marks I thin. I ended up just stating stuff like
One photon releases one electron
E=hf
Wave energy depends on frequency for particle model an on intensity for wave model
Energy supply is continuous, so can build up for wave model
....


i put the similar as u.
I also put that the number of photoelectrons emitted per second is proportional to the intensity of radiation. <<any marks/
Reply 693
Original post by hamzeh h
its UV since frequency was 1.04x10^15 or something and i memorized the wavelengths and this one ws 2.somethingx10^-7 which is UV


The radio waves v=flambda question on section b was a nice hint helping for this question, I'm surprised nobody made use of it.
Reply 694
Original post by krisshP
The radio waves v=flambda question on section b was a nice hint helping for this question, I'm surprised nobody made use of it.

yaa
Reply 695
Original post by hamzeh h
yaa


Did you do that as well? Look at post 685, that's how I figure it out. They expected you to be so cunning.
qu6) the transition which did u guys choose? 5 to 4?
Reply 697
Original post by Freddy-Francis
qu6) the transition which did u guys choose? 5 to 4?

4 to 5 it was absorption of lowest frequency
Grade boundries estimates for the A guys?
Original post by Freddy-Francis
qu6) the transition which did u guys choose? 5 to 4?


I did 4 to 5 beacuse it was being absorbed

Latest

Trending

Trending