The Student Room Group

OCR PHYSICS B G495~ 18th June 2015 AM ~ A2 Physics

Scroll to see replies

Original post by STATER
What exactly were they asking for in question 3 (the one about fields that had a straight line graph)?
I said the field was uniform shown by the straight line through the origin, and did two calculations which ended up as 4.2x10^3 and 4.3x10^3. Really was unsure what to do tbh.


I put that it non uniform as electric potential should be inversely proportional to distance, and it wasn't.
Original post by STATER
Mass was not conserved since a gamma photon was released.


Gamma photons have no mass!!!!

It was charge. Alpha particles are charged.
Original post by RealTime
Yeah I think that's correct, I also got that too


how did you do it? :/i did it quite a funny way and got the correct answer just wondered what people's methods were since my graphical calculators didn't show gamma to enough decimal places so I had to use an old fashioned calculator haha!
Original post by McCustard
Did anyone else get 2312K for the temperature for 3N electrons per second? It took me forever!
Also now I'm worried that I didn't read it properly and can't remember if it wanted the increased temperature or how much it had increased by :s-smilie:


I got that too, but I don't know if that's right or not.
Original post by McCustard
Did anyone else get 2312K for the temperature for 3N electrons per second? It took me forever!
Also now I'm worried that I didn't read it properly and can't remember if it wanted the increased temperature or how much it had increased by :s-smilie:


Yes I did , you used the fact that current was proportional to the boltzmann factor and my calculation involved logging both sides haha but yeah i got exactly that and it seems correct to me! :smile: worked through it logically so should get the marks!
Original post by Minecraft27
I got that too, but I don't know if that's right or not.


yes since number of electrons released was proportional to current so you did current*3 and this equal the BF so you then log both sides and get that answer for T :smile:
Original post by Minecraft27
Gamma photons have no mass!!!!

It was charge. Alpha particles are charged.


Wasn't it quarks



Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by HennersPD
how did you do it? :/i did it quite a funny way and got the correct answer just wondered what people's methods were since my graphical calculators didn't show gamma to enough decimal places so I had to use an old fashioned calculator haha!


I calculated the Lorentz factor (gamma) and then rearranged the formula for calculating the Lorentz factor which involved v and made v the subject
What did you guys get in the 4 marker about the accurate representation of the decay particles in a magnetic field?

I worked out their deflection radii and found that beta particles in reality have a radius 200 times smaller than an alpha decay particle and wrote about how the diagram was inaccurate for only showing beta particles as having slightly less radius etc etc.

PS: What thing is not conserved? I wrote charge, because alpha particles are charged.
Original post by Mutleybm1996
Wasn't it quarks



Posted from TSR Mobile


i think i put charge since an alpha particle is charged!
Reply 290
Original post by Minecraft27
Gamma photons have no mass!!!!

It was charge. Alpha particles are charged.


Gamma photons have energy. E=mc^2. Energy released = mass lost.
Original post by RealTime
I calculated the Lorentz factor (gamma) and then rearranged the formula for calculating the Lorentz factor which involved v and made v the subject


ah yeah thats what i did :smile: good!
Original post by Minecraft27
What did you guys get in the 4 marker about the accurate representation of the decay particles in a magnetic field?

I worked out their deflection radii and found that beta particles in reality have a radius 200 times smaller than an alpha decay particle and wrote about how the diagram was inaccurate for only showing beta particles as having slightly less radius etc etc.

PS: What thing is not conserved? I wrote charge, because alpha particles are charged.


yeah i did the same :smile: should get the marks! also said that beta particle should have less deflection than shown by the diagram!
Original post by HennersPD
yeah i did the same :smile: should get the marks! also said that beta particle should have less deflection than shown by the diagram!


Shouldn't it have much much more?
Original post by STATER
Gamma photons have energy. E=mc^2. Energy released = mass lost.


What was the equation? Wasn't it an alpha decay?


Posted from TSR Mobile
Did anyone else write Charge for the thing that isn't conserved.

It's not quarks because there are no free quarks.
It's not mass because photons have no mass.
And I can't remember what the other thing was.

@post 295, a gamma photon was released too.
Original post by Minecraft27
Did anyone else write Charge for the thing that isn't conserved.

It's not quarks because there are no free quarks.
It's not mass because photons have no mass.
And I can't remember what the other thing was.


Other thing was nucleon number?


Posted from TSR Mobile
What did everyone get for the minimum X-ray wavelength? I got something like 3.3x10^-11 metres but I don't remember exactly.
Reply 298
Original post by Rhetorical Hips
What was the equation? Wasn't it an alpha decay?


Posted from TSR Mobile


I don't remember exactly. It had an electron and an antineutrino. Also the question said that a photon was released which I remember well because I highlighted it
Original post by Minecraft27
What did everyone get for the minimum X-ray wavelength? I got something like 3.3x10^-11 metres but I don't remember exactly.

Yes thats correct :smile:

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending