Man arrested with guns and a koran at Disneyland Paris

I'd say they're more like lost sheep. Desperate for guidance, easily manipulated, a deep-seated need to be led.

I'm trying to think of another ideology that explicitly calls for the death of those that oppose it. Especially one that is subscribed to by over 1 billion people.

You are entirely correct that there are other political and social systems that are imperfect, but whataboutery is not a defence that is used by the intellectually honest.

Moreover, my question was specifically asking what it is about Islam that, when implemented literally and without any modern, revisionist spin, always seems to result in death or oppression for so many people - bearing in mind that it is not some man-made system devised to gain and maintain power, but the final and perfect revelation of an infallible, omniscient being as the ultimate guide for a perfect society?

So I ask again, why is this? (Answers to the question, rather than something completely irrelevant would be appreciated).

But I'm not aware of any ideology that espouses this.
And define "undesirables".
Also, your premise that euthanising the disabled will benefit society is fundamentally flawed, as we have clear evidence that those with "deformities" can make valuable contributions to society.

Although, we are actually following a program of "eugenics-lite", by identifying and attempting to correct genetic predisposition to certain conditions. Do you object to this?

And you won't find any because I don't think any of them do.

That is not whataboutery. That was in relation to your question, postulating that only Islam exclusively calls for violence and oppression.

Perhaps you're overthinking this? Perhaps it's simply man-made, which would certainly explain the "violence and oppression"?

Asking silly questions like that may get you silly answers.

In order for humans to thrive, we can't have weak people. We must be ruthless and do what needs to be done.

Yes. One should waste money fixing issues when one could simply create something new.

Agreement.
Result!

Whataboutery compounded with a straw man. I have never claimed that Islam is the only religion that contains exhortations to violence and oppression/discrimination.

Well, clearly. The point was in response to those who claim that it is divine in origin.

Explain why it was a "silly question".

Nonsense. "Weak people" have been around since time immemorial. In fact, physically weak people dying early may well have held back the advancement of mankind, if they may have had some mental advantage that would not become apparent until later in life.

I'm not sure what you mean here by "create something new".
Why throw away something that can be fixed, in preference to making something new that may not be any better than what you have thrown away, and may possibly be worse?

Seeing as how you've decided to start down the road of facetiousness, I'm not going to engage with you any longer.

I was merely defending him because I KNOW he was falsely accused.
If I thought he was guilty I wouldn't have quoted the user in the first place.

How can you know he is innocent

unless it was you who made the account in his name

J'accuse.

religion of peace

The followers that misinterpret do not represent the religion.

How can you know he is innocent

unless it was you who made the account in his name

J'accuse.

The followers that misinterpret do not represent the religion.