Why is the sovereignty of the UK so important to them?
Because we need to be able to have a democracy. Loosing parliamentary sovereignty created a democratic deficit as highlighted by the factortame case.
Why are they so opposed to an EU superstate.
The EU is made up of separate countries, with different languages, different customs, different ways of life, it is not right to try and force that together under a Federal Banner to satisfy some politicians. One only has to look as far as Greece, who voted against democracy, only to be rejected by the EU, to see how this would cause a war. Disagreements would be prevelant and Europe would be run with a tyranny of the majority.
Hitler tried that once. We stopped it for a reason, not just because of his views.
If all they want is UK interests protected resources could be invested in influencing leadership of the EU.
We want full control, we strive for more.
Do they just want to recreate the England they knew as children?
No, as the world has changed. Now, we have emerging markets which present us with huge opportunities for growth, to get trade deals with them, we have to leave.
Rulers create borders for politico-economic reasons.
And social, just look at the tension in Germany, or more locally, Rotherham.
So why do they, citizens of a country, place so much importance on the particular geographic bounds in which a ruler (in a general sense) has decided to install his regime (that is within which a system of governance decides to operate).
Because borders are an essential way to control who comes in and out of our country. Criminals could go anywhere they want, escape the eyes of the law, as there will always be borders on this earth, as they work. Coming back to the EU, a controlled border would be a win for equality. At the moment, we unfairly discriminate against those who are not from the EU, to compensate from those coming from the EU. Our country is obssesed with numbers, and not the quality. If we controlled our borders fully, which is only possible if we leave, we can accept more from outside the EU, reject criminals and instead allow those who will be a boost to the economy to come in. Again, we do not settle for slightly beneficial immigration, we want immigration to be hugely profitable for the country.
I can understand why British fishermen would be opposed to the EU, but I don't think they make up a wealthy enough or powerful collective group alone to be the driving force of this campaign.
No, you are correct. However, their issue (factotame case) is a prime example to others of what could happen to them. A democratically passed act being rejected by an unelected body? This is what people do not like.
Also, the common fisheries policy has cost British costal communities 115,000 jobs.
Is there a large lucrative enough British industry I am missing that would fare better outside the EU?
Obviously, the steel industry would be hugely protected, as we could introduce tariffs. Leaving the EU is, in general, anti-big business. This is because the larger companies thrive with lots of regulation, as smaller business cannot cope with it. But to answer your question, manufacturing, farming, fishing would profit.
However, you miss the point. We are, as we all know, a country of imports. Leaving the EU would allow us to create trade deals with the rest of the world, as well as the EU. Given our status as consumers, this would be a huge benifit to the British consumer.
Or perhaps some British politicos fear the diminution of power they would have in a superstate?
No, they just like democracy and a voice in politics.