University Student kicked off plane for speaking Arabic

There is a big difference between a report of suspicious behaviour being investigated and banning a group of people from something.

Where has anyone suggested banning anyone who speaks Arabic from flying?

thats correct, lets also ban all white right wingers from cinemas, or schools. Would you take the chance and rather have 2500 people shot out of the sky???

wtf are you on about you cretin

The person i quoted said it was justifiable that the person was banned given he was speaking arabic thus causing the suspicion afterall we wouldnt want to risk 250+ being blown out. Likewise i argued its justifiable to ban white right wingers from schools and cinema afterall we wouldn't want to risk 1000+ being gunned down.

Do you follow so far?

FUUUU commie leftie. you are everything thats wrong with this country. curl up and die.

*single digit IQ

That is not at all what he said.
Do you think it is unreasonable for security to investigate reports of suspicious behaviour?

That is what he intrinsically implied even a moron can notice that.

As I said on the OP i understand why they had to investigate and proceede with ultra cautioun. Its unnecessary if you look at the numbers, you're more likely to be killed by a cow and 1000x times more likely to be killed by a gun user yet I still acknowledged a need for the Airline to respond to show their stance on such accusations.

YET after he was detained and investigated then
thoroughly searched by Dogs, even his ****ing genitals were inspected after all that the FBI gave the 'all clear signal', yet the airline still decided to ban him.

Sometimes what people say is what they mean and at no point did he say anything that even implies that you are searching for things that aren't there.

based on what is said banning him is wrong but you have to realise this is one sides version and I'm not going to say that the airline was wrong as it is possible that the airline was justified with the ban.

Oh dear. Hope he got some compensation...


Posted from TSR Mobile

I garuntee that if you get 10 people to read that 9 will easily notice the implicit assumption. You'll be the 1.

As for the airline if they had a suitable justifiable cause to ban him they would have said, they already released a comment. But you appear to be making the assumption that they even need a reason to ban someone. Ever since after 9/11 tremendous authority were transferred to Stewards/Pilots to ban people as they likewithout needing a reason.
Im on my phone right now ill quote some examples/ news story tomorrow.
As for two sides of every story, that is most certainly correct Ive quoted all the evidence/News article feel free to read the entire thing. I even went as far to say given the recent scaremongering in American Media and issues in the middleeast was essential for the Airline as both a Political and a Business move to respond suitably and seriously to show that they care about customer security. This still doesn't justify.bamning them after the FBI gave the 'All clear' signal.

It looks like you're the only one.here that isn't seeing both sides of the story.

Have the airline actually shared their full version of events? I haven't seen one just the usual pr.
Do you feel you have got the whole story here? Personally I don't.
you are right stewards and pilots make the decision for the plane but the company as a whole they don't.
'Although Southwest called Makhzoomi the following Monday to inform him that his status was clear to fly' sounds like he is banned that's from your thinkpress link.

It seems you are not seeing your articles never mind both sides.

and this is coming from a community assistant... wow.

He isn't even requesting for monetary compensation. All he's asking for is an apology which the airline are yet to give.