The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

Original post by phantomspecialist
I would say go with 4-6, depending on how quickly you can write. Then again your safest bet is to email and ask your teacher tbh.


yeah i'm self taught so i cant do that.... 4-6 sounds like A LOT for a 10 mark question?! i mean someone just said i'd be alright learning one for each?
For addiction how can negative symptoms be useful for Schizophrenics?
Original post by evekay
seriously considering buying loopa's media book today and learning them instead of addiction... advice??

But i dont know anything about it. Is that psya4
Original post by NHM
You can't use the diathesis stress model for psychological explanations


yes you can loopa e book has it in the behavioural approach
Original post by NHM
You can't use the diathesis stress model for psychological explanations


As a conclusion..
Original post by bubblegumcat
ikr!!! took me the whole day to learn the essays. How did u find the exam?


it was not terrible, not great either! it really felt like they were trying to catch us out :-( how did you find it?
Original post by phantomspecialist
I would say go with 4-6, depending on how quickly you can write. Then again your safest bet is to email and ask your teacher tbh.


This is definitely not needed you dont even need 4-6 for a 24 marker.... 1-2 studies would be more than enough as the rest will be eval points
Original post by Ladymusiclover
Yeah I think so.


Well I did a past paper (can't remember which year) and it asked how would this person increase internal validity? But I'm not sure
I suggest just knowing it just incase
Maybe someone who's more clued up than me could help :frown:
Anyone with sz or media essays please pm me ! I have nothing I need so much help
Guys what actually are type 1 and type 2 errors? :frown:

I know type 1 is false positive (reject null hypothesis when actually true)
And type 2 is false negative (accept null when it was false) ?
Hey all, is it true they can give you 0 for the exam without you knowing just because they suspect cheating for example? I had some doodles and reminders on my hand, on my palm as well, and I am worried sick that the invigilator thought I was cheating
I've just looked at past essays I've done and in them I used 3-4 studies, so again it depends on the question and if and/or how much you're going to evaluate the study. But I guess you could get away with using 2
Original post by CAPTAINSHAZAM
This is definitely not needed you dont even need 4-6 for a 24 marker.... 1-2 studies would be more than enough as the rest will be eval points


Evaluating points for the study, such as methodological criticisms, or as in IDA?
Original post by phantomspecialist
Evaluating points for the study, such as methodological criticisms, or as in IDA?


You were saying about studies? 1-2 studies is enough for 10 mark essays the rest will be eval
Original post by CAPTAINSHAZAM
You were saying about studies? 1-2 studies is enough for 10 mark essays the rest will be eval


Alright if you say so, but I'm gonna stick with 3 just in case 😌
Original post by phantomspecialist
Alright if you say so, but I'm gonna stick with 3 just in case 😌


Overkill imo but if you can learn that much then good luck
Reply 4336
Original post by psychology_kills
Hey all, is it true they can give you 0 for the exam without you knowing just because they suspect cheating for example? I had some doodles and reminders on my hand, on my palm as well, and I am worried sick that the invigilator thought I was cheating


The invigilatior may have reported you to JCQ where you can be disqualified...
if a question asked explainations of a theory/therapy how many marks would you get for each theory/therapy?
(edited 7 years ago)
Reply 4338
image.png
Original post by Alisahussain1
yes you can loopa e book has it in the behavioural approach


No you cannot.
Original post by NHM
image.png

No you cannot.


not for A01 but you can use it as an evaluation point

Latest

Trending

Trending