The Student Room Group

AQA Geography Unit 4B Pre-release

Scroll to see replies

Original post by chembioldoki
I'm confused about the units of tonnes of oil equivalent in P2 and P3??
It says the unit is 'thousand tonnes of oil equivalent'. So for example does this mean the total energy consumption in P2 was 155,000 tonnes of oil equivalent or 155,000,000 tonnes of oil equivalent?
It means 155,000,000 tonnes of oil equivalent. In all honesty it is pretty confusing, no one in my class noticed until the teacher pointed it out.
Original post by Domers_
It means 155,000,000 tonnes of oil equivalent. In all honesty it is pretty confusing, no one in my class noticed until the teacher pointed it out.


Thank you! I wasn't sure if I was just making that up! Nice to know I'm not 100% delirious yet lol
Original post by Hesterrose
where? I just went through the entire thread again but i couldn't see the answers to the second paper?


Q1. 2013 coal dominated, by 2016 overtaken by natural gas and renewables. Production of electricity set to reduce until 2020, linking to number of power stations? by 2020 nuclear station will become operational. 2030 renewables predicted to be largest source, as much as natural gas and nuclear together. could be due to governments drive for wind

Q2. items 1&2. need for better energy security as growing reliant on foreign imports. renewables are unable to meet needs at the moment due to high costs. fracking takes up less space.

Q3. items 3&4 geology is vastly different to USA. uk is more heavily faulted increasing extraction prices. awareness of different tax rates,ownership rights of mineral reserves and investment levels affecting price.

Q4. Adv: reduce imports, research is huge, minimal visual impact, one well above many fractures below, jobs locally, taxes, fill current gap in energy mix.
Dis: disruption, route access, volume of HGVs, takes investment away from development of renewables

Q5. range of methods and strengths/weaknesses. item 5, comment on changes cuadrilla has made after first rejection regarding traffic.

Q6.along the lines of with distance views become more positive. questionnaire will prove/ disprove. open and closed questions with pros and cons explained. bias not intended.

Q7. systematic sampling houses within villages. or random to choose farms. go to busy areas eg train stations and ask opinions. expect to see adv and dis of each method and potential problems with getting a response

That took ages ahah hope it helps :smile:
Original post by bigmac98
how has everyone prepped for the fieldwork? can anyone give me any help etc because i have no clue...


look through this ahah
do we take the pre release booklet (unannotated) with us into the exam or will there be a copy there? (Im an external candidate)
Original post by clarypops
Q1. 2013 coal dominated, by 2016 overtaken by natural gas and renewables. Production of electricity set to reduce until 2020, linking to number of power stations? by 2020 nuclear station will become operational. 2030 renewables predicted to be largest source, as much as natural gas and nuclear together. could be due to governments drive for wind

Q2. items 1&2. need for better energy security as growing reliant on foreign imports. renewables are unable to meet needs at the moment due to high costs. fracking takes up less space.

Q3. items 3&4 geology is vastly different to USA. uk is more heavily faulted increasing extraction prices. awareness of different tax rates,ownership rights of mineral reserves and investment levels affecting price.

Q4. Adv: reduce imports, research is huge, minimal visual impact, one well above many fractures below, jobs locally, taxes, fill current gap in energy mix.
Dis: disruption, route access, volume of HGVs, takes investment away from development of renewables

Q5. range of methods and strengths/weaknesses. item 5, comment on changes cuadrilla has made after first rejection regarding traffic.

Q6.along the lines of with distance views become more positive. questionnaire will prove/ disprove. open and closed questions with pros and cons explained. bias not intended.

Q7. systematic sampling houses within villages. or random to choose farms. go to busy areas eg train stations and ask opinions. expect to see adv and dis of each method and potential problems with getting a response

That took ages ahah hope it helps :smile:


Thank you so much it really does!!
Original post by katieeee_98
do we take the pre release booklet (unannotated) with us into the exam or will there be a copy there? (Im an external candidate)


It really depends on the school. being external i would advise you take it with you
How do we answer the question
Compare and contrast figures P2, P3 and P4
Also Can someone write in simple terms what the difference is in what they measure?
What does '‘energy efficiencies will continue offset population growth’ mean?
Guys HELP :'(

i'm stressing so badly now, just wondering if someone can help me on a few things i'm still confused on though.
Has anyone got any specific comparisons between USA v UK fracking? Just thing about how to answer why USA is much cheaper

Evaluate the methods that Cuadrilla is undertaking to reduce the risks of fracking in the Fylde? What extra information does anyone have to enter level 3, i'm struggling to find many ideas outside the AIB
Thanks guys for any help you give <3
Reply 330
Original post by J.birdy98
Guys HELP :'(

i'm stressing so badly now, just wondering if someone can help me on a few things i'm still confused on though.
Has anyone got any specific comparisons between USA v UK fracking? Just thing about how to answer why USA is much cheaper

Evaluate the methods that Cuadrilla is undertaking to reduce the risks of fracking in the Fylde? What extra information does anyone have to enter level 3, i'm struggling to find many ideas outside the AIB
Thanks guys for any help you give <3


US is far bigger and has far bigger spaces between urban/rural settlements so much less of a backlash about fracking in local areas
US has far less taxation
US is far less densely populated so less likely to affect people in particular (similar to first point)
US has state governance and then national governance, the UK just has national (could affect prices, taxation, regulation etc.)
Fracking has been pretty much specifically developed for the US, whereas the UK would have to alter the methods used so it was appropriate to use for the UK

In terms of the Cuadrilla bit, theres a whole bunch of youtube videos that they've put up where they talk about the processes etc. but you could potentially talk about about what MORE they could do as an evaluation. Such as means for noise pollution, water contamination lower down etc.
Reply 331
I am slightly confused where people are getting the idea that the US has more gas than in the UK because in the AIB on page 8, item 3 it says that the 'Bowland-Hodder shales have the potential to form a shale gas resource comparable to the producing shale provinces of North America'
Thanks
Can anyone explain figure p5 in item 3? What are the 'upper' and 'lower' units?
Thanks for correcting me and clearing that up... xx
Original post by LouLewis
The problem is that despite the UK extracting more natural gas, the actual impact of this upon the global markets will be minute. We lack the volume of gas to really drive down energy bills for consumers, the price of gas is subject to the whims of the market and as supply is maintained at a somewhat constant level by the OPEC countries, then it is demand which has the greatest power to influence the price. It is as simply as you said: supply and demand; unfortunately the actual outputs of gas are not significant enough for energy prices to be driven down when we are (currently) a part of the EU. The chairman of Cuadrilla (Lord Brown) in 2013 publically stated that fracking would not drive down the price of gas or drive down energy prices, despite the claims of Osbourne and Cameron.
Part of the reason for the genuinely significant fall in US energy prices was due to the fact that they keep a 'closed' market for gas and oil - meaning that they export no oil and very little gas xx
Reply 334
Identify an appropriate hypothesis to test residents opinions about fracking as described in item 7 and explain how a questionnaire could help you gather data to prove/disprove the hypothesis.
How do we answer the question Compare and contrast figures P2, P3 and P4
Also Can someone write in simple terms what the difference is in what they measure?
I'm still confused at what we need to know for this paper? Just the stuff in the booklet? Or surronding things if so what?
Thanks!
Hello! PLs could someone help me! "Discuss how the physical and social geography of Lancashire makes this an ideal location to undertake fracking.
Geography can seriously "frack off". Does anyone have any good resources for the planning in terms of data presentation because I have no idea which stat test would be carried out etc? Also I have no idea how to revise for this and I have a biology exam tomorrow so RIP.
Original post by Idolo123
I'm still confused at what we need to know for this paper? Just the stuff in the booklet? Or surronding things if so what?
Thanks!


Bit of both: Unit 4B is an issue evaluation exercise and, as such, demands the development of the range ofgeographical skills, knowledge and understandingidenti ed in this speci cation. Unit 4B allowscandidates to extend the content of the speci cationwithin the specialised context of issue evaluation.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending