Original post by FluuidKarmaironic. have you ever been to india and visited deobandi mosques? they are self-described wahhabis half the time and the current form of the movement itself is inspired strongly by wahhabism.
you can't just say "ahhagnor the wahaabi card" like read up on their history as well as their theology.
"They [the Wahhabis] declared war against those who refused and opposed another in joining the army of Muhammad ibn Sa’ud when it was said that it is halal to plunder and kill non-Wahhabis. In 1143, Muhammad ibn Sa’ud and Muhammad ibn ‘Abd al-Wahhab hand in arrived at the conclusion, that those who wouldn’t accept Wahhabism were kafirs and mushriks and it was halal to kill them and confiscate their possessions, and publicly announced their declaration seven years later. Then Ibn ‘Abd al-Wahhab started fabricating ijtihad when he was thirty-two years old and announced his false ijtihads at his forty.
As-Sayyid Ahmad ibn Zaini Dahlan, Mufti of the blessed city of Mecca, described under the topic "Al-fitnat al-Wahhabiyya”the heretical tenest of Wahhabism and the tortures of the Wahhabis inflicted upon Muslims (Al-futuhat al-Islamiyya, v2, p228-233, Cairo 1968) Hw wrote: “To deceive the Ahl as-Sunna ‘ulama’ in Mecca and Medina , the Wahhabis sent their men to cities, but these men could not answer the questions of ulama. It became evident that they were ignorant heretics. A verdict about their being disbleivers was written and issued everywhere. Sharif Mas’ud ibn Sa’id , Amir of Mecca, ordered that the Wahhabis shall be imprisoned. Some Wahhabis fled to Dari’yya and told what had happened to them.
The ulama of Hijaz belonging to all the four madhhabs, including Muhammad ibn ‘Abd al-Wahhab’s brother Shaikh Sulaiman and also his masters who trained him studied Muhammad’s books, prepared answers to his disunioninst writings, which were distructive to Islam, and wrote, to call the attention of Muslims, well-documented books in refutation to his heretical writings and proclaimed Wahhabite tenets to be heretical and harmful."
they killed and continue to kill innocent muslims. this is not permitted. it is that simple.
they literally just interpreted tahwid in such a way to justify the slaughter of other muslims.
i find it ****ing insane that some muslims support a movement which /literally/ destroyed the tomb of the mother of their prophet along with countless other family members of the prophet.
if early muslims believed the tombs led to polytheism then why did these tombs survive for so long up until the 20th century? early muslims? how early?
we know from the persecution of Hussain ibn Ali that the early muslims shortly after the death of muhammad were ravaged with corruption.