That depends on where you are studying and how they convene the course, but typically history and similar subjects have a strong emphasis on seminar style teaching where possible - which is necessarily interactive. For example at Exeter, I believe most of the history modules were split into a lecture sequence and a seminar sequence, which went hand in hand - and you had to make presentations for some of the seminars in groups (in some cases just leading a discussion) and this was assessed.
Universities on the whole are quite big on developing "transferable skills" - i.e. group working, presentation skills, writing skills, independent researching, etc. After all, these are the things you will need to do day in and out at any job - particularly for more "generalist" subjects like history where it isn't preparing for specific technical roles (as e.g. engineering). Even if you remain in academia and become a "historian" you'll still be using these skills - in teaching, for example.
There's not much you can sell about "I sat in a lecture room being talked at for three years and wrote some exams" in a job interview! It's not useful to the employers in any way
conversely, discussing your experiences in group work, giving presentations etc demonstrates useful skills they can capitalise on - so you would hope to have opportunities to do so, and if there weren't formal ones you would definitely want to arrange some of your own!