I have suggested that such a claim could explain his behaviour (I didn't claim that it
was the reason).
You have failed to provide any explanation for his behaviour beyond simply rejecting the claim hypothesis.
And are you claiming that criminals never have accomplices who lie to the police? Really? Where do you live?
In what way does my argument display "prejudice"? It is entirely supported by evidence and reasonable logic.
Ironically, it is you who has "succumbed to prejudice" by assuming that in an altercation between a black man and the police, the police must be wrong and the black man the victim, despite the obvious evidence.
Now, this is what I was saying earlier about you not being able to construct a cogent argument.
Nowhere have I make a generalisation that "police=right". I have clearly said that the evidence in this case shows the police to be acting properly and reasonable, while Adunbi acted unreasonably and improperly.
If they had run up to him shouting "On the floor n*****" and had proceeded to repeatedly punch him in the face without asking any questions, they would have been wrong and liable to disciplinary action and probably prosecution.
I am no supporter of the police per se. I am a supporter of the rule of law. As long as the police stay within that, I will support them. Likewise, if a private individual steps outside it, they will lose my support.
It is proved by watching the video. They are asking him do identify himself because they suspect he is a wanted criminal. He refuses to do so, and becomes offensive, aggressive and uncooperateive. The male offices specifically states that unless he continues to refuse to identify himself, he will have no choice but to arest him, This is some 2 minutes before the taser is fired and a minute before Adunbi starts wrestling with the police in an attempt to leave the scene.
Now, what part of that is the police acting unreasonably and Adunbi acting reasonably?
All you have done is cry "prejudice" and "police are bad", without providing any further argument.
What? Of course I acknowledge other people's opinions, but that doesn't mean I must agree with them, especially if that opinion is both illogical and unsupported by evidence. Adunbi obviously thought it was reasonable to deliberately and aggressively obstruct the police in carrying out their legal duties, as do you. I do not think that is reasonable behaviour.
By your argument, we should be "acknowledging" creationism as well as evolution!
As I said, your inability to form a cogent argument is obvious.
Dunning Kruger in full effect.