The Student Room Group

Religious Studies

How do you tackle a Part D Religious Studies question to get full marks?
Part D? Like a 12 mark question?
Reply 2
Original post by citric carrot
Part D? Like a 12 mark question?


Yes, exactly that.
Reply 3
Original post by citric carrot
Part D? Like a 12 mark question?


Yes
Reply 4
Original post by citric carrot
Part D? Like a 12 mark question?


Yes, exactly that.
Ok! I'll do my best. I did AQA RS last year and got an 8 (one off a 9). I'm getting it remarked, but to be fair i shouldn't be too upset considering I walked out of paper 1.

So whether you're doing a themes or beliefs question differs slightly, but the basic layout is the same.

For a beliefs and teachings/practices question:

-Come up with four basic points, two in support and two against the given statement.

- You could start with either side of the argument. A good sentence starter would be: "Firstly, a (insert religious person) could agree with the statement because...(insert point). This is because in the (insert holy book), (insert religious figure) says: "..."

- To start the new paragraph, link them together with something along the lines of " However, a/another (insert religious person) could perceive this argument as less valid because they believe.. (insert point)." Keep using quotes, if you can't remember many, as long as you have at least 1 per religion you're all good). Alternatively, you can get the marks for saying something like "Jesus taught that...." Without using a direct quote.

- I lay my paragraphs out like this: Support, oppose, support, oppose, conclusion.

- Throw your own opinion in on the conclusion. Say something like :" In conclusion, as a (insert religion or atheist), I believe that (insert point) is the most convincing argument because... (very brief reason here).

I thought I would include one of my own old ones that got full marks! Hope this helps :-) Honestly you don't need to write too much as long as what you say is correct.

Best of luck with the exam!


‘Private worship has more meaning for a Christian than public worship’

A Christian may agree with this statement because private worship is a direct relationship with God. The participant can ask for personal advice, which may have more meaning for a Christian, as they will not be influenced by the ideas of others. In addition, it is possible to become embarrassed in a public situation, which may restrict the true meaning of the worship, and make it become meaningless and superficial. Jesus taught to pray in worship in private in order to have our prayers answered by God.

Another Christian could describe this argument as weak because a group of people all worshipping together about a topical issue (eg: poverty, war) can have a greater impact. One person worshipping alone is unlikely to have a great impact, but when many Christians join together in prayer, it can become even more spiritual and powerful. This ensures that the prayer will always have meaning, and not just for one or a few people.

In contrast, it is said that public, and specifically liturgical worship, forms no real relationship with God, an therefore rarely has meaning. It is easy to ‘show off’ when praying, which the Bible makes clear is despised by God. Jesus said; “When you pray, be not a the hypocrites”, which means that we should not attempt to flaunt our morality and religious ideas - it will make them superficial and meaningless.Relations with God should always be personal in order for them to have meaning, because liturgical worship often has very little substance, only set prayers and rituals which are easy to follow without truly understanding them. In addition, some Christians feel pressured into taking part in services simply because they are traditional, but without an understanding of God, prayers cannot be answered, making them meaningless.

This argument could be considered flawed by some Christians, as many people feel insecure or unsure of what to pray for in private. In public, there is always a worship leader or priest/pastor, who can ensure that the topic of worship has meaning. It is unfair to tell people who struggle to pray on their own that their worship has little meaning - as long as you are sincere, it doesn't matter how you pray.

In conclusion, I think that the most convincing argument is the fact that all worship, if meant genuinely, has meaning and is valid in the eyes of God. While it is important to pray privately, it is also essential for Christians to join together as part of a community.
If you would also like an example of a thematic studies question, don't hesitate to ask:smile:
Reply 7
Original post by citric carrot
Ok! I'll do my best. I did AQA RS last year and got an 8 (one off a 9). I'm getting it remarked, but to be fair i shouldn't be too upset considering I walked out of paper 1.

So whether you're doing a themes or beliefs question differs slightly, but the basic layout is the same.

For a beliefs and teachings/practices question:

-Come up with four basic points, two in support and two against the given statement.

- You could start with either side of the argument. A good sentence starter would be: "Firstly, a (insert religious person) could agree with the statement because...(insert point). This is because in the (insert holy book), (insert religious figure) says: "..."

- To start the new paragraph, link them together with something along the lines of " However, a/another (insert religious person) could perceive this argument as less valid because they believe.. (insert point)." Keep using quotes, if you can't remember many, as long as you have at least 1 per religion you're all good). Alternatively, you can get the marks for saying something like "Jesus taught that...." Without using a direct quote.

- I lay my paragraphs out like this: Support, oppose, support, oppose, conclusion.

- Throw your own opinion in on the conclusion. Say something like :" In conclusion, as a (insert religion or atheist), I believe that (insert point) is the most convincing argument because... (very brief reason here).

I thought I would include one of my own old ones that got full marks! Hope this helps :-) Honestly you don't need to write too much as long as what you say is correct.

Best of luck with the exam!


‘Private worship has more meaning for a Christian than public worship’

A Christian may agree with this statement because private worship is a direct relationship with God. The participant can ask for personal advice, which may have more meaning for a Christian, as they will not be influenced by the ideas of others. In addition, it is possible to become embarrassed in a public situation, which may restrict the true meaning of the worship, and make it become meaningless and superficial. Jesus taught to pray in worship in private in order to have our prayers answered by God.

Another Christian could describe this argument as weak because a group of people all worshipping together about a topical issue (eg: poverty, war) can have a greater impact. One person worshipping alone is unlikely to have a great impact, but when many Christians join together in prayer, it can become even more spiritual and powerful. This ensures that the prayer will always have meaning, and not just for one or a few people.

In contrast, it is said that public, and specifically liturgical worship, forms no real relationship with God, an therefore rarely has meaning. It is easy to ‘show off’ when praying, which the Bible makes clear is despised by God. Jesus said; “When you pray, be not a the hypocrites”, which means that we should not attempt to flaunt our morality and religious ideas - it will make them superficial and meaningless.Relations with God should always be personal in order for them to have meaning, because liturgical worship often has very little substance, only set prayers and rituals which are easy to follow without truly understanding them. In addition, some Christians feel pressured into taking part in services simply because they are traditional, but without an understanding of God, prayers cannot be answered, making them meaningless.

This argument could be considered flawed by some Christians, as many people feel insecure or unsure of what to pray for in private. In public, there is always a worship leader or priest/pastor, who can ensure that the topic of worship has meaning. It is unfair to tell people who struggle to pray on their own that their worship has little meaning - as long as you are sincere, it doesn't matter how you pray.

In conclusion, I think that the most convincing argument is the fact that all worship, if meant genuinely, has meaning and is valid in the eyes of God. While it is important to pray privately, it is also essential for Christians to join together as part of a community.

hi thank you soooo much could you please send me your liturgical worship vs non liturgical essay plan thank youuuuu
Hey. I got 219 marks in my R.E. exams, the boundary was 198 marks for a 9 so I think my structure paid off. I always loved the essay questions and rarely missed out full marks! It's not as hard as it seems haha!
I always remembered to say how strong an argument was, for example by saying, 'This is a weak argument because the biblical evidence supporting it is too vague and subjective depending on the reader.' Examiners hate too vague explanations of why an argument is weak/strong, so never put e.g. 'This is a strong argument because their is biblical evidence.'- make sure you explain why this makes it strong, and add a little bit of depth- this always secures you a high grade.

I would recommend SOAC.
Some Christians believe....
Other Christians believe...
Atheists would say that....
In Conclusion...

You can switch this up depending on the question, you can make the S + O parts as similar or as different as you think is needed.

Good luck! Message me if ya need any more advice.
Yeah, exactly what the others said, make sure you have a good conclusion!
And include quotes :smile:

Quick Reply

Latest