A hoot, a holler, and a howdy, y'all...Jak here; long time reader - first time poster...
I’ve been offered a place at Warwick on their MA International Relations course for autumn this year. I was, and still am, delighted to have been made such an offer but this is where it gets interesting...Just this morning I had a surprise mail from the good folks over at LSE. Seems they have given me an unconditional offer to study for their MSc Global Politics come September. This I thought was never on the cards as I’m only too aware of how strict the admissions criteria are in London town.
Now the fees are drastically different, LSE is going to end up costing me about £25,000 including fees and accommodation etc, whereas Warwick will more than likely be half of that, let’s say £15,000 max.
Reputation-wise I’d say LSE gets the nod there but there is very little in it, right? Warwick being such a young university is only gaining affections worldwide as the years pass. League tables show Warwick as the better university but I’m sceptical of these anyway. They are both generally top 5 by anyone’s standard anyway which is good enough for me, and prospective employers I’m sure.
Hailing from Leeds, which is arguably the entertainment capital outside of London, I’m not really looking to go 'Buck Wild' during my time away. Warwick would be more than adequate for my toned down social life. The SU, and Leamington’s high end bars would most likely meet requirements. The London nightlife would possibly be wasted on me. Post grads should be studying in any case, leave the partying to the Year 1's n 2's.
But LSE is LSE, after all. The admissions pack they sent was impressive; even included an LSE magazine "for alumni of the London School of Econ...". They certainly know how to get your juices flowing!
Any advice would be appreciated.
Jak
PS - I’m awaiting a reply from SOAS btw...that’s when the shizer will really hit the fan!