Wasn't sure where to put this, just a general interest. Thanks!
Personally I'd opt for WW2, jungles and ambushes are not really favourable.
Vietnam. More chance of still being alive, given the dates.
I wasn't saying ALL combat was like that but seriously, can you not just let a thread roll?
If i had to i guess i would say WW2...
WWII... the Hun treated their military prisoners fairly well.
I think people forget to realize the British/Americans fought WW2 in the jungles in the Pacific.
probably WW2 as the americans put the vietnamese through some pretty awful stuff and later suffered from physiological disorders as a result- sure people in WW2 did as well but not so large a scale
WW2 - I would fight for ideals which I believed in.
I would join the germans..
Probably WW2, defending Grand Britannia an all.
WW2- That war had to be fought for numerous reasons. Also i'd take my chances on a random fighting zone rather than be plonked straight into a jungle environment fighting against an invisible enemy and for a nation thats own legitimacy was debatable.
Having said that i'd assume you'd have a better survival rate in Vietnam (albeit with traumatic experiences).
Korea or Vietnam is a question i'd like to ask...
WW2. I want to kill Nazis.