Amazing as hell response from guy on youtube

If only everyone was like this!

Pretty much the only intelligent and well-thought out response I have seen to the attack so far.



(And woah, hope your mum is OK )

Although I think he executed his response to the Woolwich murder wonderfully, there are two things I disagree with:

Michael Adebolajo is extreme because Islam is extreme. It explicitly tells believers to wage war against infidels. Muslims can deny it but it's there in black and white.



I fail to see how "Islam the religion of peace" - it's the most ironic statement in history.

Those who take a religious book literally are considered 'loonies' and that's why religion is 'loony'.

Adebolajo has slaughtered a non-muslim man who has indirectly caused havoc in Islam countries.

Terrorism is defined:



Terrorism isn't exclusive to Muslims, those who fit in that category are considered terrorists. The most publicized "white" terrorist in recent times was Anders Behring Breivik. However the present day media's use of propaganda has made society associate 'terrorism' with 'Islam'.

Although I think he executed his response to the Woolwich murder wonderfully, there are two things I disagree with:

Michael Adebolajo is extreme because Islam is extreme. It explicitly tells believers to wage war against infidels. Muslims can deny it but it's there in black and white.



I fail to see how "Islam the religion of peace" - it's the most ironic statement in history.

Those who take a religious book literally are considered 'loonies' and that's why religion is 'loony'.

Adebolajo has slaughtered a non-muslim man who has indirectly caused havoc in Islam countries.

Terrorism is defined:



Terrorism isn't exclusive to Muslims, those who fit in that category are considered terrorists. The most publicized "white" terrorist in recent times was Anders Behring Breivik. However the present day media's use of propaganda has made society associate 'terrorism' with 'Islam'.

Wow, you must be incredibly dense. I don't understand how you can take the time to find verses to support whatever anti-Islam agenda your purporting, but not take the time to look at the context of the verses. No person would be regarded sane if they opened a book half way through, read a sentence, and proposed that they have somehow understood the entirety of the book. It's just plain nonsense. So, why have you chosen to do this with the Qur'an? Just for your information though, those verses specifically talk about self-defence and war. Not only that though, but for the majority that don't have historical context they have a verse before or after that specifies that if the enemy should seek peace, then peace should always be granted. For those that have historical context they strictly refer to war that was started by the Pagans/Qur'aish (they broke peace treaties). In fact, the moral fibre of the Qur'an with regards to war is a lot more sound than the actions Democractic, Imperialist countries of the 21st century, so I'd have a rethink of what your actually saying.