The EU should be for west European citizens only

You do realise the report that Cameron shelved would have told everyone that current EU immigrants contribute on average 1/3 more through tax payments than they take out of the system in public services and benefits, and that only 1-2% of them aren't working?

Actually they have some of the highest wages on the planet.

Studied the EU in depth in both an economic sense (A level economics) and now a legal sense.

Truth be told, for Britain as a institution the expansion of Europe can only be a good thing. Put it simply: by 2028 we will be the most economically developed nation in terms of gross domestic product in all of Europe. Yes, that means overtaking France and Germany.

Why is this? Well to put it simply, the expansion of the EU into less developed countries allows them free trade. Its bad for Germany because all the products they make will now be undercut by cheaper labour in other member states such as Romania for example. However, for us... well thanks to Mrs Thatcher we do not make much, so we're not losing any business by those countries joining.

In fact we gain something, all of these emigrant's come to Britain. The result is a catalyst for population growth, and anyone who's done economics knows population growth results in an increase in long term supply, and thus economic growth. Also, our international trade in terms of insurance and banking has gone up considerably in these countries.

But does this net gain reflect in day to day society? Probably not, especially since housing/education/employment will be strained. I'm against the EU anyway, but not for your reasons - rather its just a white man's club - why cant Turkey (Who's population would not emigrate to the UK) a much more developed country than the rest of Eastern Europe join? They've been trying for decades, before even Poland attempted it.

When it was just Western Europe, fine. But why deny Turkey the right to join but allow the rest of Eastern Europe? So basically the EU is stating "We're drawing the line at the point the colour of your skin changes'

P.S The points you have stated from Saudi Arabia - if to be believed - would never work here. Its discriminatory, and infringes on the 1998 European Convention of Human Rights Act.

At least Ukrainians know how to riot, not like the worthless chavs we have here, I swear every chav should be shot on sight.

I really hope you're banned from this forums and the police follow this message up in real life. You demonise the working class as 'chavs', yet you probably have no experience of real poverty yourself.

The working class, from all countries across the world, are the backbone of society. The EU should be expansive, granting all Europeans (no matter their race or location on the continent) the full benefits of free movement and labour. Western Europe is not superior to Eastern Europe; in fact, the West should be investing more money in the weaker economies to help raise the standard of living for poorer people.

I think we should be should be taken out of the EU

Considering you've studied the EU in depth, in both an economic and legal sense, you're obviously well aware that the accession of Turkey has nothing to do with the the fact that their skin colour is slightly darker than that of the average Brit, French or German; but has everything to do with the acquis, which Turkey is light-years away from completing.

Of the 33 chapters relevant to Turkey it has completed 4: Company Law; Enterprise & Industrial Policy; Science & Research; and External Relations. But, having such in depth knowledge of the EU, you would, of course, know this.

And then there's always the Cyprus question, which, again, you're more than familiar with.

Turkey has said if they would allow entry upon completion of 'asquis' requirements would they let them in. The EU said no. Anyway, as a country, Turkey is far more similar to Britain than, say Poland, for example. Which Muslim countries have hot women prancing about in bikinis, have bars around every street corner, a fair court system and friendly cops.

I was arrested in Turkey on holiday once, it was a misunderstanding. However, the police was fair and I had a lot of faith in the court system, something I wouldn't have in Romania. Ultimately, its discrimination that the Turks cant join, just being 'Islamic' (albeit very secular) is the only reason they have.

The EU was most effective when it was an exclusive club comprising of western Europe, before deciding to do charity and expand east to 3rd world countries like romania and bulgaria.

True, it may feel essential to have that cheap pole or romanian for cleaning your bathroom and repairing your house; but honestly look at the benefits of gulf countries such as the the U.A.E

1. Top jobs and salaries are reserved by law for U.A.E citizens

2. All the social benefits like lower taxes, free education and healthcare go to U.A.E citizens only.

3. Foreigners are not allowed citizenship

4. 80% of the population are foreign but contribute for the prosperity of the 20%.

5. U.A.E citizens by law get first preference for jobs

6. Temporary work permits only and low wages for foreigners

This sounds like a good deal. Why on earth would Britain need east europeans to come here and drain our limited resources? To eat up the healthcare, education, dole, jobs etc.

Why is everybody here so pessimistic about Muslims..

Cultural differences, Sharia Law sterotype, lack of social integration.

Turkey has said if they would allow entry upon completion of 'asquis' requirements would they let them in. The EU said no. Anyway, as a country, Turkey is far more similar to Britain than, say Poland, for example. Which Muslim countries have hot women prancing about in bikinis, have bars around every street corner, a fair court system and friendly cops.

I was arrested in Turkey on holiday once, it was a misunderstanding. However, the police was fair and I had a lot of faith in the court system, something I wouldn't have in Romania. Ultimately, its discrimination that the Turks cant join, just being 'Islamic' (albeit very secular) is the only reason they have.

Anyway, you seem smart. Think about it this way, 'Europe' is a man-made concept, there is no Europe on the planet... so, given this, and given that the more and more developed countries that join will only help member states. Why even restrict it to the Western white? I'm not saying they should do it but, from an economical standpoint, the EU should invite China... So what if it isn't in Europe, change the name because Europe is a man-made concept, having free trade with the Chinese would be amazing. Disclaimer: In theory, not saying they should do it.

Overall the EU and European Union is a man-made instruct to make themselves feel more powerful than they really are. If it was a block created to actually increase economic and cultural gain, then they'd be inviting the powerful nations around the earth to join and not developing white nations that sponge off us (Greece, for example).

The migrants building the skyscrapers in Dubai as we speak have some of the highest wages on the planet?

That's a good one.