If God exists, then who created HIM? HE DOESN'T EXIST!

For example, I know that the world is spherical and not flat. Yet if someone asked me to produce evidence at this moment of time for my belief i wouldn't be able to. The calculations have been done, yes. But i just haven't seen them or learnt them. So on my part i putting full faith in that belief.

Not now. But maybe later.

That's the whole point. The flaws with strong verificationism is that the evidence is required right now. Whereas with weak verificationism the evidence can be brought to you in principle. So you can look up the evidence. Same as God, he is eschatologically verifiable and so verifiable in principle

Nonsense. I've heard of those studies and as well as not being peer-reviewed, the most logical explanation is the leaving of air from the lungs and not the soul. To prove something as monumental as a soul you're going to need a lot more than simply claiming the body gets lighter..

Quantum entanglement does not at all prove an afterlife exists..

wait, which god? there's only one? can we prove there are thousands of gods?

So you have no evidence of an afterlife and therefore no evidence for God. I'm not interested in things that can be verified in principle because literally an infinite number of things can be claimed to exist in this way.

The body gets lighter moments after death. evidence of a physical soul?

Why is it a He?

God of the Gaps there....

We are respectful of your right to express your view, not necessarily your view itself.

you have not understood Quantum Mechanics nor Hicks replica theory if you feel that they don't go hand in hand. the very nature of spin and entanglement means that partials can interact irrespective of the distance between them, making Hicks replica theory infact a logical postulate.

those same people tell children they are going to suffer for eternity if they don't subscribe to the same set of beliefs.

Trust and faith are not the same thing. Science publishes its evidence and findings for review by anyone. You can conduct your own experiments to verify it. You trust science because it has proved itself to be consistently reliable, but you can test it yourself. Unlike a religion, science is constantly searching for better explanations of reality - it will change its view if the evidence supports it.

Religions supply no credible evidence. You cannot verify them. There are so many incompatible religions that it is obvious that all, or almost all, must be wrong. Why do you think yours is right?

Why don't you have faith that invisible unicorns exist? Why don't you follow all religions?

If they murder, rape or steal. No ones going to Hell for telling a white lie.

The whole framework of science is grounded on faith. It makes a lot of assumptions.

Would testimony suffice?

Name one.

That this world is real, rather than something out of the matrix...

They'ld only go to 'Hell' if they murder, rape, kill, abuse or more. They certainly wont go to Hell for telling a white lie and having blues about God.

Doesn't matter how severe the sin is, you still go to Hell regardless if you don't accept Jesus/God or whatever the requirements are.

Equally, you can be a rapist, thief and murderer and stilll get into Heaven.

No, it doesn't make that assumption. Science models what we observe - it doesn't claim that it's 'real', whatever that means.

The whole framework of science is grounded on faith. It makes a lot of assumptions.