The Student Room Group

OCR - A2 English Literature 2017/18

Scroll to see replies

It’s not in my inbox 😩sorry to be a pain could you reply to it on here please x
I’m doing ocr English and most of my class are pulling out D’s/E’s it is such a hard exam board
I’m doing gothic TBC/Dracula
Shakespeare I’ve done hamlet doing twelfth night this year
And doing Ibsen dolls house/ Rossetti
Currently doing my second piece of coursework

However on my first draft of coursework one a comparative essays between 2 texts I got 12/25 so would be grateful if someone could look over it for me?
Reply 22
Hiya

I'm doing Gothic- The Bloody Chamber and Dracula
Also doing, Tempest, Rossetti and A Dolls House.
So are the questions based around Victims for gothic and deception for paper 2? I heard that last year for the tempest it was Caliban but not sure.

Original post by Ruraa
I realised that there isn't a specific forum for year 13s OCR A level Eng Lit 2017/18 yet!
So I guess we can make a start.

The texts I'm studying are:
Hamlet, A Doll's House, The Merchant's Tale
Gothic Literature: Dracula, The Bloody Chamber

Mocks are coming up (for me at least) and I know few of the questions that are coming up (it's from the 2017 paper), but I'm clueless on what extract for the gothic will come up! I know the text, but not the specific extract... frustrating!

Anyway, what are everybody's texts and how are they revising?
I'm struggling with Hamlet note taking.. ugh.
Reply 23
Original post by ForeverFrench
I’m doing ocr English and most of my class are pulling out D’s/E’s it is such a hard exam board
I’m doing gothic TBC/Dracula
Shakespeare I’ve done hamlet doing twelfth night this year
And doing Ibsen dolls house/ Rossetti
Currently doing my second piece of coursework

However on my first draft of coursework one a comparative essays between 2 texts I got 12/25 so would be grateful if someone could look over it for me?


Oh no, is there a reason why your class is underperforming? I'm sure you'll improve though!

Also for coursework, what texts are you comparing? If I'm familiar with them I might be able to help!
Reply 24
Original post by Ella ms
Hiya

I'm doing Gothic- The Bloody Chamber and Dracula
Also doing, Tempest, Rossetti and A Dolls House.
So are the questions based around Victims for gothic and deception for paper 2? I heard that last year for the tempest it was Caliban but not sure.


Yeah on victims, but not deception (that's for paper 1)

Also I'm not sure about the tempest :frown: hopefully someone can help out!
Reply 25
Original post by Leahrgraham
It’s not in my inbox 😩sorry to be a pain could you reply to it on here please x


That's my mistake, I didn't send it properly! I did it again!
I do cancer English literature.
Great Gatsby, age of innocence, A dolls House ,Christina Rossetti poems and Measure for measure
Original post by Ruraa
Oh no, is there a reason why your class is underperforming? I'm sure you'll improve though!

Also for coursework, what texts are you comparing? If I'm familiar with them I might be able to help!

Nope they just keep telling us it’s hard grade boundaries and it won’t be like that in the exam

Coursework is A Streetcar named desire
And Beloved
Reply 28
Original post by ForeverFrench
Nope they just keep telling us it’s hard grade boundaries and it won’t be like that in the exam

Coursework is A Streetcar named desire
And Beloved


Ah, it's a bit unrealistic of them maybe?

What's your essay topic? I also did A streetcar named desire, but I compared it with Philip Larkin poems

My essay topic was on death, so I focused on the comparison about death
Original post by Ruraa
Ah, it's a bit unrealistic of them maybe?

What's your essay topic? I also did A streetcar named desire, but I compared it with Philip Larkin poems

My essay topic was on death, so I focused on the comparison about death

I did masculinity
Reply 30
Original post by ForeverFrench
I did masculinity


Hm, I can't remember much about masculinity in Streetcar as I haven't touched that theme in ages, but there can be good points you can talk about such as:

> Stanley' masculinity is his 'identity'. There's this theme of 'insecurity' in Streetcar, so Stanley is insecure of his masculinity; he's Polish, thus he knows very well that he's looked down upon. He says that he's "100% American" out of insecurity, because he doesn't want to be classified as Polish since it has implications. So if he doesn't maintain the dominant, American figure (which is ideal in America and looked up to), he'll be emasculated.

> The idea of insecurity also explains his aggression and abuse; he's obsessed with power as he's not higher class (like Blanche), thus he asserts dominance to maintain control, which is a form of masculinity - he doesn't want to be emasculated simply because he's lower class.

> For context or interpretation, you can talk about Darwin's notion of evolution or the 'imperative' that for the sake of survival, he as a man, must maintain his masculinity - masculinity includes characteristics such as being physically strong, straight-forward thinker, no emotions etc. You can elaborate on the idea of "sexual jealousy" in which men control their female partners from cuckolding them, which is why he's constanly so in control over Stella.

> You can argue that Stanley, who reinforces the dominate, masculine male archetype, is emasculated. In the crying shower scene, he becomes emotional, so he subverts that archetype. (You can also say how his insecurity emasculate him too)

> Talk about the contrast between Stanley and Mitch; they're opposites. Stanley, the dominant, masculine archetype has a wife. But Mitch doesn't. What could Williams be suggesting?

That's all I can think of right now! Hope it helps!
Original post by Ruraa
Hm, I can't remember much about masculinity in Streetcar as I haven't touched that theme in ages, but there can be good points you can talk about such as:

> Stanley' masculinity is his 'identity'. There's this theme of 'insecurity' in Streetcar, so Stanley is insecure of his masculinity; he's Polish, thus he knows very well that he's looked down upon. He says that he's "100% American" out of insecurity, because he doesn't want to be classified as Polish since it has implications. So if he doesn't maintain the dominant, American figure (which is ideal in America and looked up to), he'll be emasculated.

> The idea of insecurity also explains his aggression and abuse; he's obsessed with power as he's not higher class (like Blanche), thus he asserts dominance to maintain control, which is a form of masculinity - he doesn't want to be emasculated simply because he's lower class.

> For context or interpretation, you can talk about Darwin's notion of evolution or the 'imperative' that for the sake of survival, he as a man, must maintain his masculinity - masculinity includes characteristics such as being physically strong, straight-forward thinker, no emotions etc. You can elaborate on the idea of "sexual jealousy" in which men control their female partners from cuckolding them, which is why he's constanly so in control over Stella.

> You can argue that Stanley, who reinforces the dominate, masculine male archetype, is emasculated. In the crying shower scene, he becomes emotional, so he subverts that archetype. (You can also say how his insecurity emasculate him too)

> Talk about the contrast between Stanley and Mitch; they're opposites. Stanley, the dominant, masculine archetype has a wife. But Mitch doesn't. What could Williams be suggesting?

That's all I can think of right now! Hope it helps!


I have used some but most of what you’ve said I thought Of but it wouldn’t fit with my theisis
It’s not my evidence or A02 that’s the issue x my evidence fits perfectly with beloved (which again is why I couldn’t use some of your suggestions)
I need specific A03 like precise key dates etc and not drifting from my evidence from my question
Also question we’ve been told to stick to a 2,000 word limit but it’s hard and I did but I feel like if I expanded and went over my coursework would be better and did you include every AO in every paragraph
Reply 32
Original post by ForeverFrench
I have used some but most of what you’ve said I thought Of but it wouldn’t fit with my theisis
It’s not my evidence or A02 that’s the issue x my evidence fits perfectly with beloved (which again is why I couldn’t use some of your suggestions)
I need specific A03 like precise key dates etc and not drifting from my evidence from my question
Also question we’ve been told to stick to a 2,000 word limit but it’s hard and I did but I feel like if I expanded and went over my coursework would be better and did you include every AO in every paragraph


Ah I see, I see your struggle. What kind of comparison points did you make between your texts?
And yeah, I tried to fit in all AO in one para where it best fit. But it got a bit clunky, so I cut it down. It's not really about how MUCH context, interpretations, etc. you use, it's how you USE it. So it's better to only put specific AOs where they should be and not force them into every single para

Also, just in case if you didn't know, yes the word limit is 2,000 but that excludes quotes! So the quotes you use from your texts do not count! It makes things a bit easier.
Original post by Ruraa
Ah I see, I see your struggle. What kind of comparison points did you make between your texts?
And yeah, I tried to fit in all AO in one para where it best fit. But it got a bit clunky, so I cut it down. It's not really about how MUCH context, interpretations, etc. you use, it's how you USE it. So it's better to only put specific AOs where they should be and not force them into every single para

Also, just in case if you didn't know, yes the word limit is 2,000 but that excludes quotes! So the quotes you use from your texts do not count! It makes things a bit easier.


My theisis is that Morrison and Williams do portray elements of the stereotypical norms we expect men to be such as dominant however they also show men in an alternative view like compassionate etc
I did women as the leader for one point
The idea that trying to conform presents dificulities
Third point
Men are masculine

We were told we had to have anew argument I wanted to argue men were masculine but my teacher told me that wouldn’t be a fresh idea which moderators look for
Reply 34
Original post by ForeverFrench
My theisis is that Morrison and Williams do portray elements of the stereotypical norms we expect men to be such as dominant however they also show men in an alternative view like compassionate etc
I did women as the leader for one point
The idea that trying to conform presents dificulities
Third point
Men are masculine

We were told we had to have anew argument I wanted to argue men were masculine but my teacher told me that wouldn’t be a fresh idea which moderators look for


Ahh I see, and hm I get what your teacher is trying to say
Personally for me, I would've started my argument that yes men are portrayed as masculine, but I wouldn't focus on it too much. So then I can counter argue and show different portals and focus on those ideas.

I'm not so sure how else I can help? Has anyone in your class got high marks of this coursework?
Original post by Ruraa
Ahh I see, and hm I get what your teacher is trying to say
Personally for me, I would've started my argument that yes men are portrayed as masculine, but I wouldn't focus on it too much. So then I can counter argue and show different portals and focus on those ideas.

I'm not so sure how else I can help? Has anyone in your class got high marks of this coursework?


I wanted to do that argument but he told me I wouldn’t get a good mark. Highest mark was a C 16/25
I can email you my coursework?
Reply 36
Original post by ForeverFrench
I wanted to do that argument but he told me I wouldn’t get a good mark. Highest mark was a C 16/25
I can email you my coursework?


Yeah you can, I'll PM you my email
"women are the subtler sex: more varied in their attraction, more ingenious in their stratagems" in the light of this view, discuss ways in which writers present women I have use Rossetti poems and a dolls house

Any help please
The texts I'm studying are:
Paper 1:
Measure for Measure for Section 1
She Stoops To Conquer and The Merchant's Tale for Section 2

Paper 2:
Dystopia unseen for Section 1
The Handmaid's Tale and 1984 for Section 2

If anyone have any notes or helpful tips for these texts, please PM me.
Original post by student.1999
The texts I'm studying are:
Paper 1:
Measure for Measure for Section 1
She Stoops To Conquer and The Merchant's Tale for Section 2

Paper 2:
Dystopia unseen for Section 1
The Handmaid's Tale and 1984 for Section 2

If anyone have any notes or helpful tips for these texts, please PM me.


Give me notes for measure for measure

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending