Sorry you've not had any responses about this. Are you sure you've posted in the right place? Here's a link to our subject forum which should help get you more responses if you post there.
Just say that so and so argues this about your topic which is backed up by this evidence. Then you can either say this is backed up by —— insert evidence or there’s more evidence against it —— insert evidence
Just say that so and so argues this about your topic which is backed up by this evidence. Then you can either say this is backed up by —— insert evidence or there’s more evidence against it —— insert evidence
i sat my as history last june and came out with quite a high a grade on results day. my school requested my papers back and i had a quick look at them after i saw this thread just to make sure my answer was accurate!
i sat my history exams with the northern irish board (ccea) and did not include any historian's quotes or ideas, apart from when i was quoting the sources/interpretations in the necessary questions. however, if you would like to give yourself a little bit of extra work (lmao) you could potentially really impress your examiner if you were able to use a relevant quote in your answer - however, it really is not necessary and your quote revision may go to waste in case it doesn't fit with the question :/
hope this was helpful + good luck with your exams!
i sat my as history last june and came out with quite a high a grade on results day. my school requested my papers back and i had a quick look at them after i saw this thread just to make sure my answer was accurate!
i sat my history exams with the northern irish board (ccea) and did not include any historian's quotes or ideas, apart from when i was quoting the sources/interpretations in the necessary questions. however, if you would like to give yourself a little bit of extra work (lmao) you could potentially really impress your examiner if you were able to use a relevant quote in your answer - however, it really is not necessary and your quote revision may go to waste in case it doesn't fit with the question :/
hope this was helpful + good luck with your exams!
i thought you might be because ccea isn't a very popular option for history.
i've looked at the aqa papers though and the questions seem to be the same (mainly source based/some own knowledge) so everything i said previously is still okay! maybe even see if there is a particular historian who is well-known for their research in your period of history and learn one or two quotes from them if you would like but again - not necessary at all.
i thought you might be because ccea isn't a very popular option for history.
i've looked at the aqa papers though and the questions seem to be the same (mainly source based/some own knowledge) so everything i said previously is still okay! maybe even see if there is a particular historian who is well-known for their research in your period of history and learn one or two quotes from them if you would like but again - not necessary at all.
hope this helps
how did you revise for history? and what structure did you use for the source questions?
how did you revise for history? and what structure did you use for the source questions?
we studied a really unpopular time period for our exams (17th century italy and france!) and there were no resources other than our teacher's notes - so I basically made my own notes from that using flashcards/sticky notes etc! but websites like bbc bitesize have a lot of helpful stuff for most history courses.
for the source questions we use a method called DAMMITLK: - date - author - mode (letters, speeches etc) - motive - information (content of the source) - tone - limitations (e.g. written years after the event = missing details) - knowledge (just your own knowledge that isn't in the source)
basically, go through the sources and use that as a check-list!