The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

Demokrat
No, reproduction through incest should definately be illegal. It's not a double standard. I accept that people should have the opportunity to reproduce, and they do - do it with someone that's not in your family. The comparisons with disabled people are ridiculous, when they reproduce they are not actively increasing the chances of genetic problems in the offspring with their choices, whereas those who reproduce through incest are.


By that logic, two disabled people who want to reproduce should be banned from doing so, because they're deliberately increasing the chances of their child being disabled. After all, if they reproduced with someone healthy then the risk is lower.
Reply 341
Demokrat
I'm sorry but I don't think you're going to push me into a corner and represent me as some eugenicist who thinks disabled people should not reproduce. The evident difference is that when healthy people have the chance to produce healthy children they are putting their children at risk when they produce offspring from incestuous relationships. It is not fair that their children be vulerable to illness and genetic deformation when they have the chance to be perfectly healthy.

Once it starts to affect other people and put their health at risk, it becomes an issue.


Is it just the physical well being of the child that you're worried about, or psychological well being as well? If so, I assume you'd support a far more authoritarian child services which has various powers to gaze over families across the country to ensure that they provide a psychologically stable and caring home, no?
Reply 342
BNP Tasha Djanovic
Anyone should be able to do whatever they want to whoever they want as long as both are consenting.


Cool. So if someone says I can kill them and eat them then I can do it? We both consented.

I'm not making the above up, this actually happened with two men in Russia. They both met online.
Reply 343
Demokrat
I don't see how that follows and what it has to do with reproduction through incest.


Most people have problems with reproduction through incest.
Lots of people don't have problems with reproduction by people with genetic diseases.

This is the double standard that people are refering to.
Reply 344
Demokrat
You're proving my point, I'm arguing that reproduction through incest should be illegal.


Er. Yes?
Most already agree with that. But still there is a double standard where one is illegal but not the other.

Reproduction through incest is a completely different issue to having a relationship though.
Demokrat
I'm sorry but I don't think you're going to push me into a corner and represent me as some eugenicist who thinks disabled people should not reproduce. The evident difference is that when healthy people have the chance to produce healthy children they are putting their children at risk when they produce offspring from incestuous relationships. It is not fair that their children be vulerable to illness and genetic deformation when they have the chance to be perfectly healthy.

Once it starts to affect other people and put their health at risk, it becomes an issue.


I'm not trying to push you into any corner. I realise that you aren't going to change your mind either way, so I'm merely pointing out your double standards.

Disabled people have the chance to increase the chances of their children being healthy by not reproducing with another disabled person.
Healthy people have the chance to increase the chances of their children being healthy by not reproducing with siblings.
Why is one any different to the other? Why is one illegal and the other not?

Disabled people reproducing together are affecting other people and putting their health at risk. Why should we allow them to reproduce and not a brother and sister?

Really, you're talking as though every child born from an incestuous relationship is a mutant, rather than there just being a slightly higher than average risk.
Demokrat
It's not a double standard, there are valid for reasons for having problems with reproduction through incest, it is a different situation than reproduction with genetic diseases.


No it isn't. Two healthy people who have children via incest are less likely to have genetically mutated children than two people who suffer chronic genetic disabilites. So if anything, the reproduction with genetic diseases is worse.
Ewww.... thats disgusting



Makes me puke
Tombola
a) It's rep.
b) You seriously expect no consequences from speech?
c) Good on you for speaking out aloud.


Why did you take that in the simplest way possible? The connotations flew way over your head.
I was talking about raising certain opinions that are traditional but right, and being flayed for them. Also, the point of a debate is not to penalise a person but put across different opinions to make each other aware and challenge one another intellectually. You need to see someone. And what do you mean 'consequences' for speech? That is what I am talking about; why should 'free' speech deserve 'consequences'. There is something rather sinister about that.
Reply 349
Atlas of The World
Why did you take that in the simplest way possible? The connotations flew way over your head.
I was talking about raising certain opinions that are traditional but right, and being flayed for them. Also, the point of a debate is not to penalise a person but put across different opinions to make each other aware and challenge one another intellectually. You need to see someone. And what do you mean 'consequences' for speech? That is what I am talking about; why should 'free' speech deserve 'consequences'. There is something rather sinister about that.


Yes I'm probably cynical about free speech, since I don't really believe in speech without impact and consequences. Yes, my idea of free speech may be incorrect politically but I look at it in it's most literal term.

Besides. Why not?

Why aren't these people allowed to disagree with your opinion? They're perfectly entitled to voice their own opinion without debating it (You can treat them as an idiot if you wish) but anyhow something such as reputation is not really punishment as such.
Joanna May
No it isn't. Two healthy people who have children via incest are less likely to have genetically mutated children than two people who suffer chronic genetic disabilites. So if anything, the reproduction with genetic diseases is worse.


The reason why reproduction between two people with genetic disabilities isnt illegal, is because many many people dont even KNOW they have a genetic disability or a hereditary disease. A lot of people dont even find out they do until they get considerably older.
However, a brother and a sister know full well that if they have a child they are at a higher risk of severe physical and mental disability.
Reply 351
Ignorance is not an excuse.

Besides... that doesn't make sense. Surely it'd be it's illegal for them to breed, but most people don't realise it.
Tombola
Ignorance is not an excuse.

Besides... that doesn't make sense. Surely it'd be it's illegal for them to breed, but most people don't realise it.


Lets be realistic, HOW many people research whether they may carry a genetic defect? Not many. I havent. Have you?
Reply 353
Antonia87
Lets be realistic, HOW many people research whether they may carry a genetic defect? Not many. I havent. Have you?

But what if they do happen to know they have one? Should it be illegal then?
Reply 354
Antonia87
Lets be realistic, HOW many people research whether they may carry a genetic defect? Not many. I havent. Have you?


Do you think this won't be detected in the future?
Psyk
But what if they do happen to know they have one? Should it be illegal then?


In my opinion, yes. If they BOTH carry a genetic defect.
Tombola
Do you think this won't be detected in the future?


Well when its detected in the future its usually too late.
Take this example - an expecting mother and father attend a regular scan and consultation on their unborn child. During the scan, they are informed the unborn child has Downs Syndrome. It is only THEN the parents are informed they carry a genetic defect. And that is very common.
Tombola
Yes I'm probably cynical about free speech, since I don't really believe in speech without impact and consequences. Yes, my idea of free speech may be incorrect politically but I look at it in it's most literal term.

Besides. Why not?

Why aren't these people allowed to disagree with your opinion? They're perfectly entitled to voice their own opinion without debating it (You can treat them as an idiot if you wish) but anyhow something such as reputation is not really punishment as such.


You are fulfilling an Orwellian prophecy.

Goodness, I am not saying people are not allowed to disagree with opinions. I am puzzled at how you are drawing all of this from what I have said. I am simply saying I am surprised at the lack of maturity evident in a lot of people's reactions. We are supposed to behave like adults, are we not, as opposed to angry children!
Your idea of 'free speech' is seperate from what I am suggested. You have a warped idea of it. Consequences are only due to bad choices or ideas which are arguably harmful. Why should free speech afford 'consequences'. Slightly sinister, don't you think?
I think you lost your way when you were typing: I made no suggestion that people should not be entitled to their opinions. I am really quite surprised at your views. I was simply referring to lack of manners and maturity in debating today. I wasn't an advocate to suppressing people of their opinions! Your claimed 'literal' idea of 'free speech' is mislead in its nature - even though I was not talking about the implications of free speech or whatever you drew from my statements. Your replies are good examples of the angry haze of impoliteness that is present in debating among young people.
twin porn is amazing :smile:

Im all for it, so long as both parties consent
Reply 359
Atlas of The World
I completely agree with you. I have been penalised for raising my opinions in past debates and it is refreshing to have somone say what they really think and for it to be right.


Also, the point of a debate is not to penalise a person but put across different opinions to make each other aware and challenge one another intellectually.

I am simply saying I am surprised at the lack of maturity evident in a lot of people's reactions. We are supposed to behave like adults, are we not, as opposed to angry children!


I'd just like to point out that it's more likely attacks have been on the neutral-incest side in our society. Although it can be said that I share blame when making accusations of others of being illogical with their arguement. It was wrong to go against fire with fire.

As for the speech...
In theory I agree with the idea but in practice I don't really see it happening, again perhaps I should be trying to fight for the ideal instead of accepting the current circumstances.


Your replies are good examples of the angry haze of impoliteness that is present in debating among young people.


All I can say is sorry.

Frustration created from the whole thread. It's also my natural arguement style to attack ideas with sarcasm (suppose it is indirectly attacking the person. Not my intention exactly unless the other person blatantly refuses to listen to reasoning.)

Latest

Trending

Trending