The Student Room Group

Oxbridge candidates

Just out of interest what is the lowest grades (A level and GCSE) someone has got in with successfully.

Contractually, I come from a weak sociology- economic background and am a hardworking, determined, passionate individual when it comes to learning.

At GCSE I think I will get 5 - 7 A*s and a few As with a chance of 1 or 2 C grades. At A level year 1 I will aim from AABB then drop 1 subject and year 2 aim for AAA. So can I have some reassurance and know if anyone has got in with less or equalivent to what I predicted? Do I have a big enough of chance?

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1
Original post by ZedTV
Just out of interest what is the lowest grades (A level and GCSE) someone has got in with successfully.

Contractually, I come from a weak sociology- economic background and am a hardworking, determined, passionate individual when it comes to learning.

At GCSE I think I will get 5 - 7 A*s and a few As with a chance of 1 or 2 C grades. At A level year 1 I will aim from AABB then drop 1 subject and year 2 aim for AAA. So can I have some reassurance and know if anyone has got in with less or equalivent to what I predicted? Do I have a big enough of chance?

What subject are you interested in?
People have definitely gotten in with grades similar to yours (AAA is the offer for most subjects at Oxford) but it depends on the subject.

But why AAA? It's a brilliant set of grades but aim higher!
Pretty sure you need A*AA (It's AAA for some Oxford courses) for any subject at Oxbridge (I might be wrong though). Decide your subject before you decide to apply.

Your GCSEs might not be good enough for Oxford, but they're definitely good enough for Cambridge.
(edited 3 years ago)
Reply 4
Original post by Theloniouss
Pretty sure you need A*AA for any subject at Oxbridge (I might be wrong though). Decide your subject before you decide to apply.

AAA is the standard offer for most/all humanities in Oxford. That said most successful applicants achieve more like A*AA-A*A*A.
Reply 5
Original post by RichE
What subject are you interested in?


Original post by apolaroidofus
People have definitely gotten in with grades similar to yours (AAA is the offer for most subjects at Oxford) but it depends on the subject.

But why AAA? It's a brilliant set of grades but aim higher!


Original post by Theloniouss
Pretty sure you need A*AA for any subject at Oxbridge (I might be wrong though). Decide your subject before you decide to apply.

Your GCSEs might not be good enough for Oxford, but they're definitely good enough for Cambridge.


jm sooo interested in oxford human sciences and plan to do A level bio, maths, RS and sociology. werid set but work well with what human sci and oxford looks for. I keep dreaming....
A friend of mine got into biomedical science with AAB and 12 A* at GCSE at Oxford-however for A level they were under mitigating circumstances so I think that explains why the B grade was allowed.
Hi,

First let me correct you, its "socioeconomic background" not "sociology- economic", im guessing english is your second language?

It depends really on what you subject you want to do, but your GCSE's arent great and with A-Levels of AABB you will struggle to get into most RG's never mind oxbridge, from my research most oxbridge entrants achieve around A*A*A*A at A-level so you should try to at least be predicted something like this.

I am also from a weak socioeconomic background, for me im looking to do compsci. Computer Science is the single most oversubscribed/competitive course across oxbridge/imperial (yes even more competitive than medicine)

I myself have 99999999887 (10 A*'s and 1 A) at GCSE, on target for (A*A*A*A*) at A-Level and will be applying and am doubting I can get in.

If you are doing a STEM degree then I recommend trying to win some awards in the Maths/Physics/other science Olympiads in the meantime as getting Gold in these can help you stand out. I have a Gold in the UKMT challenge but no national olympiads unfortunately.

Best of luck!
(edited 3 years ago)
Original post by Fredericks1
It depends really on what you subject you want to do, but your GCSE's arent great and with A-Levels of AABB you will struggle to get into most RG's never mind oxbridge, from my research most oxbridge entrants achieve around A*A*A*A at A-level so you should try to at least be predicted something like this.

I myself have 99999999887 (10 A*'s and 1 A) at GCSE, on target for (A*A*A*A*) at A-Level and will be applying and am doubting I can get in.

OP said AABB at AS-level. An A is the highest grade you can get at AS so I doubt AABB will be a problem (although AAAB would be more desirable).

I'm almost 99% sure that the majority Oxbridge offer-holders have taken only 3 A-levels (but @Reality Check can fact check this) and I don't know about the grades but 3 A*s is probably an overestimate.

Finally, do you want a gold sticker? Any reasonable person will doubt that they can get into Oxbridge considering a minority of roughly 1 in 5 do. A stronger academic record by no means guarantees you a place at either university nor does it make you more deserving of a place than OP (or anyone applying to your course with similar grades to OP)
Original post by apolaroidofus
OP said AABB at AS-level. An A is the highest grade you can get at AS so I doubt AABB will be a problem (although AAAB would be more desirable).

I'm almost 99% sure that the majority Oxbridge offer-holders have taken only 3 A-levels (but @Reality Check can fact check this) and I don't know about the grades but 3 A*s is probably an overestimate.

Finally, do you want a gold sticker? Any reasonable person will doubt that they can get into Oxbridge considering a minority of roughly 1 in 5 do. A stronger academic record by no means guarantees you a place at either university nor does it make you more deserving of a place than OP (or anyone applying to your course with similar grades to OP)


At a Cambridge open day, Churchill's director of admissions told me that in the arts students average 2.5 A*s and in the sciences they average 3.5 (because of further maths). A significant number take 4 - STEM with further maths and some medics do 3 sciences and maths (not sure how common that is).
Original post by Theloniouss
At a Cambridge open day, Churchill's director of admissions told me that in the arts students average 2.5 A*s and in the sciences they average 3.5 (because of further maths). A significant number take 4 - STEM with further maths and some medics do 3 sciences and maths (not sure how common that is).

A significant number take 4? Yes, of course. 'most oxbridge entrants'? No. Yes, grades are important but they look for so much more than that (how 'teachable' a candidate is, passion and enthusiasm for the subject, ability to think on your feet, etc)
Original post by apolaroidofus
A significant number take 4? Yes, of course. 'most oxbridge entrants'? No. Yes, grades are important but they look for so much more than that (how 'teachable' a candidate is, passion and enthusiasm for the subject, ability to think on your feet, etc)

I don't think you know that.
Original post by apolaroidofus
OP said AABB at AS-level. An A is the highest grade you can get at AS so I doubt AABB will be a problem (although AAAB would be more desirable).

I'm almost 99% sure that the majority Oxbridge offer-holders have taken only 3 A-levels (but @Reality Check can fact check this) and I don't know about the grades but 3 A*s is probably an overestimate.

Finally, do you want a gold sticker? Any reasonable person will doubt that they can get into Oxbridge considering a minority of roughly 1 in 5 do. A stronger academic record by no means guarantees you a place at either university nor does it make you more deserving of a place than OP (or anyone applying to your course with similar grades to OP)


Original post by Theloniouss
At a Cambridge open day, Churchill's director of admissions told me that in the arts students average 2.5 A*s and in the sciences they average 3.5 (because of further maths). A significant number take 4 - STEM with further maths and some medics do 3 sciences and maths (not sure how common that is).

It's becoming increasingly common for physical NatSci applicants to take 4 A levels, with the fourth being FM. However, candidates are not disadvantaged by taking three, which remains the standard offer - even more important because because many schools and colleges don't even offer FM.

I get the sense that many medics take four A levels too, but that tends to be more to do with the calibre of applicant generally rather than a requirement. Most medics take at least three science/maths A levels, with chemistry, biology and maths being a very common combination - a fourth one often being FM or physics, though an arts/MFL sometimes pops in there too. Again, there is no requirement to take four A levels.

3A* isn't uncommon for applicants, particularly in natsci/medicine - but again, not a requirement. There are plenty of FOIs requesting this information freely available via WhatDoTheyKnow and others - have a look through the data if you're interested.
Original post by Fredericks1
Hi,

First let me correct you, its "socioeconomic background" not "sociology- economic", im guessing english is your second language?

It depends really on what you subject you want to do, but your GCSE's arent great and with A-Levels of AABB you will struggle to get into most RG's never mind oxbridge, from my research most oxbridge entrants achieve around A*A*A*A at A-level so you should try to at least be predicted something like this.

I am also from a weak socioeconomic background, for me im looking to do compsci. Computer Science is the single most oversubscribed/competitive course across oxbridge/imperial (yes even more competitive than medicine)

I myself have 99999999887 (10 A*'s and 1 A) at GCSE, on target for (A*A*A*A*) at A-Level and will be applying and am doubting I can get in.

If you are doing a STEM degree then I recommend trying to win some awards in the Maths/Physics/other science Olympiads in the meantime as getting Gold in these can help you stand out. I have a Gold in the UKMT challenge but no national olympiads unfortunately.

Best of luck!


why you acting all high & mighty lmaoooo. AABB at AS isn’t good enough for most russel groups?? i got ABB at AS and got into Warwick, Bristol, KCL, Manchester and UCL so im not exactly sure where you’re getting this information from.

stop spreading false info just to make yourself seem better than other people.
Reply 14
Original post by Anonymous
why you acting all high & mighty lmaoooo. AABB at AS isn’t good enough for most russel groups?? i got ABB at AS and got into Warwick, Bristol, KCL, Manchester and UCL so im not exactly sure where you’re getting this information from.

stop spreading false info just to make yourself seem better than other people.

Thank you. I got a bit upset from that lol
Original post by ZedTV
Thank you. I got a bit upset from that lol


no problem my guy. speak to real oxbridge candidates / applicants and don’t listen to y12s who think they know it all.
@apolaroidofus I've found an FOI request here from 2014 to 2018.

In 2014 there was a majority of students taking >3 A levels, 1838 compared with 1278 taking 3.

Over time, this decreased. in 2018, it was 1638 with >3 and 1634 with 3.

In keeping with the general downwards trend of >3 A levels being taken, I assume that the 2019 apply year (I assume that's this year's applicants) will have had more successful applicants with 3 A levels than with more than 3.

Edit: That's Cambridge only, btw
(edited 3 years ago)
Original post by ZedTV
Thank you. I got a bit upset from that lol

Don't get upset by it, because it's a load of crap from that Fredericks person. :smile:
Original post by Theloniouss
@apolaroidofus I've found an FOI request here from 2014 to 2018.

In 2014 there was a majority of students taking >3 A levels, 1838 compared with 1278 taking 3.

Over time, this decreased. in 2018, it was 1638 with >3 and 1634 with 3.

In keeping with the general downwards trend of >3 A levels being taken, I assume that the 2019 apply year (I assume that's this year's applicants) will have had more successful applicants with 3 A levels than with more than 3.

Thanks for digging that out :smile: It's the sort of thing Doonesbury would have produced, back in the day :moon:
Original post by Reality Check
Thanks for digging that out :smile: It's the sort of thing Doonesbury would have produced, back in the day :moon:

Thanks for the suggestion - for some reason it didn't cross my mind to check FOI requests

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending