"The cowardly silence on Julian Assange's trial by the establishment media"

All but one of the Google returns in your link are about the Trump pardon offer. It's like the only way Assange can get any coverage in a new story is if Trump's in it as well. Everyone knows that Trump stories sell.

Honourable shout-out to Democracy Now! for constituting the sole exception to the rule. But I have to admit I've never heard of that publication/website, and this clearly spells the exception that proves the conclusion that the MSM have indeed maintained a de facto blackout on the Assange case (there's far more on the Dunn/Sacoolas story).

By the way this blackout has been a repeated complaint on Russia Today, so in this context, for the UK MSM to diss RT as just a Kremlin propaganda mouthpiece comes as a bit rich.

The media were reporting the claims in court of Assange's lawyer on Friday. If you care to look, you'll quickly realise the Assange case has been covered extensively for multiple different angles over the last couple of weeks.

Are you capable of using the wonderful tool that is the internet to locate such stories, or would like a responsible adult to help you?

Look, I get the anti-MSM mantra is popular among edgy kids, but if you lack the basic fact checking skills of confirm your claim that there is a blackout, someone else is simply going to point out that the evidence contradicts your false claim.

I sincerely hope you are not considering a career in law.

The media were reporting the claims in court of Assange's lawyer on Friday. If you care to look, you'll quickly realise the Assange case has been covered extensively for multiple different angles over the last couple of weeks.

Are you capable of using the wonderful tool that is the internet to locate such stories, or would like a responsible adult to help you?

Look, I get the anti-MSM mantra is popular among edgy kids, but if you lack the basic fact checking skills of confirm your claim that there is a blackout, someone else is simply going to point out that the evidence contradicts your false claim.

I sincerely hope you are not considering a career in law.

Well put.

All but one of the Google returns in your link are about the Trump pardon offer. It's like the only way Assange can get any coverage in a new story is if Trump's in it as well. Everyone knows that Trump stories sell.

Honourable shout-out to Democracy Now! for constituting the sole exception to the rule. But I have to admit I've never heard of that publication/website, and this clearly spells the exception that proves the conclusion that the MSM have indeed maintained a de facto blackout on the Assange case (there's far more on the Dunn/Sacoolas story).

By the way this blackout has been a repeated complaint on Russia Today, so in this context, for the UK MSM to diss RT as just a Kremlin propaganda mouthpiece comes as a bit rich.

That is the latest news as in what has happened recently, there are pages of news reports going back years but you weren't capable of clicking the next page button.

Don't bother with silly conspiracy theories when they are so easily disproven it is laughable.

If you have to go back "years" to find them that fatally dilutes the claim that Assange has had plenty of recent coverage. Why should we do your trawling for you?

What conspiracy theory?

I read the Guardian home page every day, have done for months and months, and during all that time stories featuring Assange have been virtually nonexistent.

I read the Guardian home page every day, have done for months and months, and during all that time stories featuring Assange have been virtually nonexistent.