Hello everyone, I'm facing a concerning situation with my university. I was unable to secure a resit opportunity after failing to meet the required credit threshold, and this is despite two appeals. My efforts to challenge this were grounded in a 'sit to fit' policy, even when I presented medical documentation indicating that I was grappling with significant health challenges during that period(disability). Out of sheer necessity, I approached the OIA. Upon examining the university's documentation, it became evident that there were numerous discrepancies. The data they chose seemed selective and dated, not to mention the unmistakable biases and glaring inaccuracies. I have meticulously compiled a 15-page response, addressing and correcting each of their claims, substantiated with clear evidence. Given this, do you believe the OIA might review the case with a more discerning eye, considering these evident 'oversights' from the university's end?