The Student Room Group

Edexcel A Level Physics Advanced Physics II 9PH0 02 - 6th June 2024 [Exam Chat]

This poll is closed

How did your Edexcel A Level Physics Paper 2 exam go?

Great 34%
Quite well 41%
Not so good 18%
Terribly 8%
Total votes: 250
Edexcel A Level Physics Paper 2 Advanced Physics II 9PH0 02 - 6th June 2024 [Exam Chat]

Welcome to the exam discussion thread for this exam. Introduce yourself! Let others know what you're aiming for in your exams, what you are struggling with in your revision or anything else.

Wishing you all the best of luck. :yy:

General Information
Date/Time: 6th June, am
Length: 1hr 45mins

Resources
https://qualifications.pearson.com/en/qualifications/edexcel-a-levels/physics-2015.html
https://qualifications.pearson.com/content/dam/pdf/A%20Level/Physics/2015/Specification%20and%20sample%20assessments/a-level-physics-data-formulae-relationships.pdf
https://www.physicsandmathstutor.com/physics-revision/a-level-edexcel/

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1
Predictions for the wordy 6 marker(s)?
The usual suspects are: Resonance, Photoelectric, Line absorption/emission spectra, Fission/Fusion, Polarisation, Standing waves/Interference.

Could there possibly be something new...?
Reply 2
surely there'll be a derivation question for the kinetic theory model. its such a chunky derivation and its never been tested
Reply 3
Original post by Deeja380
surely there'll be a derivation question for the kinetic theory model. its such a chunky derivation and its never been tested


Yeah, I've considered that. However, I feel like sometimes there are just certain questions that will never be asked. As if they have an idea of a topic and maybe realise that people won't learn it or something and so just decide not to bother with it until a new syllabus comes around and it's gone. Just my thoughts but it is definitely possible considering they've done a derviation for a=v²/r worth 5 marks in the past.
Reply 4
Original post by Need-Know
Yeah, I've considered that. However, I feel like sometimes there are just certain questions that will never be asked. As if they have an idea of a topic and maybe realise that people won't learn it or something and so just decide not to bother with it until a new syllabus comes around and it's gone. Just my thoughts but it is definitely possible considering they've done a derviation for a=v²/r worth 5 marks in the past.

yeah considering that they've never touched upon it, even in the international papers, you're probably right
Original post by Need-Know
Yeah, I've considered that. However, I feel like sometimes there are just certain questions that will never be asked. As if they have an idea of a topic and maybe realise that people won't learn it or something and so just decide not to bother with it until a new syllabus comes around and it's gone. Just my thoughts but it is definitely possible considering they've done a derviation for a=v²/r worth 5 marks in the past.


That won't be in paper 2 since it's further mechanics which is in paper 1
Reply 6
Original post by agile-infamy
That won't be in paper 2 since it's further mechanics which is in paper 1


I think they meant the style of asking for a proof straight up, the thing that’s the most analogous to kinetics proof would be the circular motion question that they have asked in the past
Original post by Deeja380
surely there'll be a derivation question for the kinetic theory model. its such a chunky derivation and its never been tested
It came up in a sample paper pretty sure (if you are talking about the Pv=1/3Nmc^2 one)
Reply 8
Original post by elizabeth:D
It came up in a sample paper pretty sure (if you are talking about the Pv=1/3Nmc^2 one)


Much more complicated than that 😆.

It is the derivation for rmspeed of molecules hitting the sides of a cube. With more added tenaciousness.
Original post by Need-Know
Much more complicated than that 😆.
It is the derivation for rmspeed of molecules hitting the sides of a cube. With more added tenaciousness.

Yes I’m pretty sure that is the one. It was simplified in the sample paper in which all the assumptions were given but you had to derive it.
Original post by elizabeth:D
Yes I’m pretty sure that is the one. It was simplified in the sample paper in which all the assumptions were given but you had to derive it.


Have you got the A level Edexcel Physics Revision Guide by CGP? It has a purple and black cover. If you do, I refer you to page 136, Thermodynamics, Kinetic Theory and Internal Energy. Derive Pressure of an Ideal Gas. It involves a cube with a molecule, Q, that moves towards a wall, A with mass, m and velocity u. Its momentum approaching the wall is mu and it rebounds with momentum -mu. Change in momentum is -mu-mu = -2mu. Time between collision of Q and wall A is t=2l/u so number of Collisions per sec is u/2l. Rate of change of momentum is -2mu × u/2l = -mu²/l. Since there are many molecules the force F = m(u1²+u2²+u3²+...)/l and so Define <u²> = (u1²+u2²+...)/N for mean square speed. Then F=Nm<u²>/l. P=F/A = Nm<u²>/V, then consider 3 dimentions so x,y and z direction (this previously was all just x direction) so pythag and Define <c²> = <u²> + <w²> + <v²> . since random <u²>=<v²>=<w²> so <u²> = <c²>/3. HENCE pV = 1/3Nm<c²>.
Original post by Need-Know
Have you got the A level Edexcel Physics Revision Guide by CGP? It has a purple and black cover. If you do, I refer you to page 136, Thermodynamics, Kinetic Theory and Internal Energy. Derive Pressure of an Ideal Gas. It involves a cube with a molecule, Q, that moves towards a wall, A with mass, m and velocity u. Its momentum approaching the wall is mu and it rebounds with momentum -mu. Change in momentum is -mu-mu = -2mu. Time between collision of Q and wall A is t=2l/u so number of Collisions per sec is u/2l. Rate of change of momentum is -2mu × u/2l = -mu²/l. Since there are many molecules the force F = m(u1²+u2²+u3²+...)/l and so Define <u²> = (u1²+u2²+...)/N for mean square speed. Then F=Nm<u²>/l. P=F/A = Nm<u²>/V, then consider 3 dimentions so x,y and z direction (this previously was all just x direction) so pythag and Define <c²> = <u²> + <w²> + <v²> . since random <u²>=<v²>=<w²> so <u²> = <c²>/3. HENCE pV = 1/3Nm<c²>.


Took like 10 mins to write all of that 😆. So was that the question in the Sample paper?
Original post by Need-Know
Took like 10 mins to write all of that 😆. So was that the question in the Sample paper?


Yes that was it, it was a 6 marker
Reply 13
Can someone send me the link to Zphysics video on lenses
we're all doing an unofficial mark scheme tomorrow yeah?
Original post by samalabaster
we're all doing an unofficial mark scheme tomorrow yeah?


I'm sure Elizabeth will lead that
So how was you meant to do the hot air balloon question
Reply 18
Original post by MysticElementz1
So how was you meant to do the hot air balloon question


Find density of hot air as mass of air in balloon is constant
Reply 19
What did people write for the toothbrush standing wave question? I waffled so hard