There will be a question on murder and voluntary, and then the other scenario will be involuntary right?

I've not revised involuntary at all - i've barely got time! Far too many exams :frown:

this is going to be the 7th out of 9.

Reply 28

whattheheck

Original post by AntoniaRose

There will be a question on murder and voluntary, and then the other scenario will be involuntary right?

I've not revised involuntary at all - i've barely got time! Far too many exams :frown:

this is going to be the 7th out of 9.

Its my 8th out of 10

Looks like i'll be doing an all nighter

Reply 29

JuicyFruityx

apparently there is a leak and ryland and private nuisance is on the tort law paper. APPARENTLY

Reply 30

kjdanii

All finished now....how did everyone do. Think I may be doing this module again, talk about brain freeze. I did scenario 1, but looking back now wish I'd done 2. Anyone else do this one?

Reply 31

Maccees

I did scenario 2...did a major cock up though, I read it as George having the drug addiction and so in the consent bit I wrote about how it might not be true consent for him and shizz...I realised later and made a paragraph at the end of the exam explaining it and trying to correct it, and then scribbling in that Harry could use diminished responsibility as well.

Hopefully not done too bad over all, only got 47% last time and I know I have done better this time.

Reply 32

kjdanii

Original post by Maccees

Hope you did better this time. This is my first attempt at this paper and I think I didnt do too well as only got to centre of answer book. Are you doing LAW04 tomorrow?

Reply 33

Maccees

Original post by kjdanii

Hope you did better this time. This is my first attempt at this paper and I think I didnt do too well as only got to centre of answer book. Are you doing LAW04 tomorrow?

Indeed. Not even started revising for it yet, been concentrating on all my others D:
You?

Reply 34

nicc

Hey, just wondering what everyone put for the 2nd scenario? Quite worried that I messed it up completely :frown:

Reply 35

MessyLJH

I did scenario 2.

I said that the tattooing was wounding s20, discussed the possibility of assault with the knife holding at georges neck, but as he was complicit he did not fear immediate violence. Then discussed the defence of consent.

Towards Janet, assaut due to words and actions, then ABH due to the medical treatment of her anxiety and depression.

Murder of Matt, I focused on the mens rea of intent, in particular Nedrick/Woollin thing on intent to cause serious harm. Raised partial defence of provocation causing harry to lose his selfcontrol, and partial defence of diminished responsibilty due to his brain injury caused by drug abuse.

The OAPA question, I think I got a few good points in, but I know I made a few errors.

How did the rest of you find it? I'm not overly confident as I know I made a lot of omissions on fairly important stuff. I'm unsure on my application of OAPA anyway. Always manage to Duck those up! :confused:

Reply 36

wondergirl01

I know this isn't AQA but in my law exam ( wjec) today I wrote aggravated burglary as being not an indictable offence ( stupid I know :frown:

)
How many marks would I lose for making this mistake.. any ideas ?

Reply 37

AntoniaRose

I was really pleased with my murder answer, used the defence of provocation. However my NFO answer was kind of erratic and rushed, because I did that last - mentioned defences of consent and insanity, and just tried to bullet point some stuff to squeeze in any extra marks when time was nearly up.
And OAPA/NFO evaluation went okay, slightly rushed though. I'm not too confident overall though, and even less about tomorrow :frown:

really worried about missing my offer.

Reply 38

Maccees

Oh ****, I forgot to talk about Nedrick/Woollin. Balls D:

Reply 39

Waqar Y

Did scenario two:

Talked about ABH, s20 GBH (infliction of GBH, couldn't be wounding as there was no breaking of the layer of skin) - this was in relation to george.
For Janet, it would be Assault(s39) and ABH(s47) - the depression anxiety etc.. following ChanFook

Defences: insanity and also Consent(bigger issue)

The murder one was decent.. i missed out nedrick and woolin to, did talk about intent to cause serious harm.. :| anyway talked about diminished responsibility and self-defence(possible-? but would fail)