The Student Room Group

OCR AS Psychology: G542: Core Studies - Wednesday 5th June 2013

Scroll to see replies

Original post by Pillow95
This is my other strength of the phsyiological approach that is one of my model answers,

The findings from physiological research can be very useful to society. They can help us understand how changes in our biology can affect aspects of our own behaviour. Therefore the findings from any physiological research can be used in the medical world to understand illness and injury to the brain.

Thanks! could you say that it provides a strong counter argument to the nurture side of the nature nurture debate?
Original post by Stephanie12345
Thanks! Would I also need to write a disadvantage of an improvement I state?

its okay and yes if you can think of any. Just think of how it will alter the results etc
Reply 582
Original post by random1234567
Thanks Ive got that do you know another one?


Another advantage would be that the findings from physiological research can be very useful to society. They can help us to understand how changes in our biology can affect certain aspects of our behaviour. This means that any findings from physiological research can be used in the medical world to understand illness and injury to the brain. For example in Maguire the study suggests that the brain has plasticity and would have significant positive implications for those who have suffered brain injury or disease.

Hope that helps :smile:
Reply 583
Original post by random1234567
Thanks! could you say that it provides a strong counter argument to the nurture side of the nature nurture debate?


Yesh you could in a way ... In maguire the study shows that the brain is altered by the environment (because they have had to undergo 'the knowledge' and therefore supports the nurture side of the nature/nurture debate...

However make sure you are careful with what you say because for example Maguire is a quasi experiment and so becuse the IV is not directly manipulated you technically cant do a cause and effect relating to nature/nurture... because it not a 'true' experiment...

I tend to steer clear of nature/nurture debate.... in less the question was directly about it... which i doubt...
Anyone got any modal approaches answers? thanks
Reply 585
In section C when you are doing the similarities and differences... do you have to use the same two studys for the similarity and difference... say Loftus and Palmer and Baron cohen for both.... OR can you do two studys for the similarity e.g. loftus and palmer and baron cohen and then for the difference do a different combination e.g. Baron cohen and Savage Rumbaugh???
Original post by Pillow95
Yesh you could in a way ... In maguire the study shows that the brain is altered by the environment (because they have had to undergo 'the knowledge' and therefore supports the nurture side of the nature/nurture debate...

However make sure you are careful with what you say because for example Maguire is a quasi experiment and so becuse the IV is not directly manipulated you technically cant do a cause and effect relating to nature/nurture... because it not a 'true' experiment...

I tend to steer clear of nature/nurture debate.... in less the question was directly about it... which i doubt...

ahh okay is it possible if I can see youre modal answer for the physiological approach? thanks
Hi there guys! Basically i have left revision right up to this last second, iv only completed 4 approaches!
Basically i got 2 questions;
1) what studies lie under...
->self report
->validity
->ecological validy
2) what studies relate to...
->psychodynamic perspective
->behaviousrist perspective

I know this may sound pathetic but yeah, i appreciate it!
Thanks in advance :smile:)))))


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by Pillow95
In section C when you are doing the similarities and differences... do you have to use the same two studys for the similarity and difference... say Loftus and Palmer and Baron cohen for both.... OR can you do two studys for the similarity e.g. loftus and palmer and baron cohen and then for the difference do a different combination e.g. Baron cohen and Savage Rumbaugh???

No, you can use different studies :smile:
Original post by Pillow95
In section C when you are doing the similarities and differences... do you have to use the same two studys for the similarity and difference... say Loftus and Palmer and Baron cohen for both.... OR can you do two studys for the similarity e.g. loftus and palmer and baron cohen and then for the difference do a different combination e.g. Baron cohen and Savage Rumbaugh???


Iv seen model answers and apparently its okay to use different studies for similarities and differences.. :smile:)


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by rainbow321
Iv seen model answers and apparently its okay to use different studies for similarities and differences.. :smile:)


Posted from TSR Mobile


Please can u post some modal answers. I really neeed help with those.
thanks
Hi there guys! Basically i have left revision right up to this last second, iv only completed 4 approaches!

Basically i got 2 questions;

1) what studies lie under...

->self report

->validity

->ecological validy

2) what studies relate to...

->psychodynamic perspective

->behaviousrist perspective



I know this may sound pathetic but yeah, i appreciate it!

Thanks in advance :smile:)))))




Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 592
Original post by qwerty2013
just curious - as my teacher only went into detail about Bandura as behaviourist and Freud as psychodynamic - but do you mind explaining how Milgram is behaviourist and how Thigpen and Cleckley are psychodynamic please?

Thanks :smile:


Hey no problem! Milgram is quite an iffy one because personally i find it obviously of a more social approach but it can be classed as behaviourism because you could argue people are socialised into believing (from often a young age) in the social hierarchy and that we learn to obey people who are higher than us in that hierarchy - as shown in Milgram's study because the participants were obeying the experimenter.

Thigpen and Cleckley for starters used projective tests (Rorschach ink blots) which is a pretty ancient Freuidian style technique that analyses peoples interpretations of the ink blots. So not only did it use psychodynamic techniques, it is based upon interpretation of these ink blots and how the different stages of the mind interpret different things so for example EW could see different things to EB (often EB seemed more regressive than EW). I'm sorry that was a bit of a crap explanation but psychodynamic is my worst fear ha ha.
Reply 593
Original post by rainbow321
Hi there guys! Basically i have left revision right up to this last second, iv only completed 4 approaches!

Basically i got 2 questions;

1) what studies lie under...

->self report

->validity

->ecological validy

2) what studies relate to...

->psychodynamic perspective

->behaviousrist perspective



I know this may sound pathetic but yeah, i appreciate it!

Thanks in advance :smile:)))))




Posted from TSR Mobile


WOW ok. In terms of validity and ecological validity EVERY study has aspects of it. So one study can be low in ecological validity e.g. Bandura, whereas some are very high in ecological validity e.g. Piliavin.

Validity isn't "yes or no" its part of every study, and it basically means "is the study measuring what the researchers intended to measure". For example, Baron Cohen used the strange stories task to test the validity, so we can say that the study IS valid because it was testing theory of mind in the participants and thanks to the strange stories task, we know that this is true.

Psychodynamic - Freud, Thigpen & Cleckley
Behaviourist - Milgram, Bandura, Piliavin, Savage-Rumabaugh
Reply 594
Original post by Aradia
with much tears and bl00d 0n0

i'm just g0ing thr0ugh them all again n0w, it's s0 much to mem0rise! i feel really silly t00, i'm d0ing this exam a year early because i really enj0yed d0ing the gcse last year (i s0und like such a l0ser, haha.) i've had n0 teacher and y0u d0n't even want t0 kn0w h0w hard it's been trying t0 figure 0ut exam technique and stuff...

i still kind 0f want t0 d0 the a2 next year, if i d0n't have t0 retake. i really d0n't learn, d0 i? psych0l0gy is just kind 0f great, th0ugh.

g00d luck, anyway! 0u0


I JUST GOTTA SAY WOW ;O HOW ON EARTH ARE YOU MANAGING THAT ...OMG, I WOULD DIE & GAVE UP AGES AGO... THAT IS AMAZING YOU KNOW, YES YOU SHOULD :biggrin: I THINK YOU WILL BE ABLE TO, CAUSE I EASILY GET STRESSED WHEN I CAN'T REMEMBER THINGS, I START GETTING ANGRY, THEN I'M IN THAT " I DON'T GIVE A F*** ANYMORE MOOD" BUT YOU WOW , YOU HAVE REAL PATIENCE :wink: IT'S GOING TO BE MORE INTERESTING NEXT YEAR THOUGH SO GOOD LUCK :biggrin:D & THANKYOU, YOU TOO :biggrin: That's real motivation ahah :smile:
what is the simarlities of the psysiological approach?
Does anyone have any clear notes on Freud?

Im just looking for some that have each event/dream/fantasy and then Freud's interpretation of these dreams?

A table would be good.. Just anything please!


Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 597
Is it for definite that in Section B we will be asked for changes and implications? Im not sure if I should memorise them for each study :s-smilie: I probably will for Baron Cohen...
Original post by DEb96
Is it for definite that in Section B we will be asked for changes and implications? Im not sure if I should memorise them for each study :s-smilie: I probably will for Baron Cohen...

Why you gonna revise it only for Baron?
Original post by Tom Istefanous
Hmm, i think we should concentrate more on the Physiological approach being to do with the biological factors, i.e

The physiological approach believes that our behaviour and experiences are often influenced by our biological properties, such as our genes, hormones, brain structure, or in this case, neurological activity. Dement and Klietman found that when they measured brain waves with an EEG, their results showed that there was a clear link between the number of times dreams were reported in REM sleep (152 times) than in NREM sleep (11 times). This demonstrates that the physiological factor (REM) influenced the behaviour/experience of the participant (Recalled a Dream).

What do you think? apart from the appalling use of the english language, do you think i would need more info than that? it is only 4 marks after all?

That is actually really good and yes I do think that would gain you 4 marks as long as you describe this approach :smile: and your English is fine as well. Tbh my psychology teacher gave me this model answer so I just used his and all I have to do is just memorize it word for word and it will guarantee me full marks but yes I doubt that's gonna happen in the exam! :frown:

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending