Why are we giving social housing to immigrants from Poland, Bulgaria, Croatia etc?

You don't really care about homeless people Billy or any notion of a welfare state that would house them. You are just using it as a reason to bash immigrants via proxy.

You don;t think we should house these people because they are foreign and you don;t think we should house native homeless people because they do not have any money of their own with which to purchase somewhere to live. You don;t want to help either.

Your crocodile tears will not put British homeless people in homes.


That advert just screams of Golden Dawn.

You don't really care about homeless people Billy or any notion of a welfare state that would house them. You are just using it as a reason to bash immigrants via proxy.

You don;t think we should house these people because they are foreign and you don;t think we should house native homeless people because they do not have any money of their own with which to purchase somewhere to live. You don;t want to help either.

Your crocodile tears will not put British homeless people in homes.


That advert just screams of Golden Dawn.

It is more to do with changes in government policies rather than the EU/migrants themselves by giving social housing priority to those work than those who are desperate. Homeless people cannot work due to discrimination and social stigma, therefore many cannot afford the rent for social housing. http://england.shelter.org.uk/campaigns/why_we_campaign/Improving_social_housing/Why_we_need_more_social_housing

Since Eastern Europeans are very likely to work and meet those criteria, they're given the priority. It's less to do with nationality and more to do with meeting the points on the checklist. Is it fair? Maybe yes, maybe not. Blame the government for this, not EU or Eastern Europeans - they haven't created the criteria.

We only like the EU when it beneficial to us, as soon as we need to give to others, everyone is up in arms. You can't receive without giving.

What does the EU give to us without receiving?

I just said we have to give to receive? what does your question even mean?

We only like the EU when it beneficial to us, as soon as we need to give to others, everyone is up in arms. You can't receive without giving.

That's all just ad-hominem though. Doesn't actually change the facts.

Well it is relevant. It's very fake to act all concerned when you don't. Billy is pretending he's upset for all those British people on the streets yet he doesn't care about them at all. He's just using this as a stick to bank his anti-immigrant drum.

Isn't it a bit silly to admit immigrants who can't even afford their own accommodation?

Well it is relevant. It's very fake to act all concerned when you don't. Billy is pretending he's upset for all those British people on the streets yet he doesn't care about them at all. He's just using this as a stick to bank his anti-immigrant drum.

You can't receive without giving.

It is a left wing thing and then they have the cheek to complain about lack of social housing for our own.

for me the immigration issue in this country can be fixed easily. we leave the EU and set up a system where you can come to live the uk if you have found a job and accommodation before you arrive and you can't claim any benefits for two years. problem solved i'd say

for me the immigration issue in this country can be fixed easily. we leave the EU and set up a system where you can come to live the uk if you have found a job and accommodation before you arrive and you can't claim any benefits for two years. problem solved i'd say

Who cares about billy though? This should be a discussion about the facts.

Agreed but I would add they must be highly-skilled. As I understand it, just apply our current non-EU immigration policy to them.

*If you have found a job which could not reasonably be filled by someone already in the country.

You claimed we cannot receive without giving:



So what have we received from the EU?