Clarification re: TSRs new rules requested on this thread.

TSR will not allow content that attacks, denigrates, intimidates, dehumanises, incites or threatens hatred, violence, prejudicial or discriminatory action against individuals or groups because of their actual or perceived race, ethnicity, gender identity, sexual orientation, national origin, caste, gender, religious affiliation, or disability status.

For the benefit of all users I would grateful if a mod could clarify what threatening hatred means? And as well please don’t place this thread into purgatory.
Why doesn’t TSR apparently protect users from abuse directed at them on the basis of sex (ie. being biologically female or male)? What would TSR do for example if a user made dehumanising comments about menstruation?

Where does the line between criticism and something that contravenes TSR’s rules lie?
Certain castes with in the caste system deserve criticism (people who don’t believe in a free and fair society might attempt to deny this) and violent religion such as fundamental Christianity also do. Protecting these groups from critique could easily be interpreted as pandering to or even supporting them.

thank you for abusing my religion.

Are you a fundamental Christian?

my religion is a private affair.

It's public enough for you to let me know that I've 'abused' it.

Well it seems like nothing has happened to this thread yet.

a feisty one you are

For the benefit of all users I would grateful if a mod could clarify what threatening hatred means? And as well please don’t place this thread into purgatory.
Why doesn’t TSR apparently protect users from abuse directed at them on the basis of sex (ie. being biologically female or male)? What would TSR do for example if a user made dehumanising comments about menstruation?

Where does the line between criticism and something that contravenes TSR’s rules lie?
Certain castes with in the caste system deserve criticism (people who don’t believe in a free and fair society might attempt to deny this) and violent religion such as fundamental Christianity also do. Protecting these groups from critique could easily be interpreted as pandering to or even supporting them.

Where did you get those rules from as well? It’s very blurry and anything that is perceived as an attack could be treated as one

Well it seems like nothing has happened to this thread yet.

Monday morning meetings.

Monday morning meetings.

The worst kind of meetings