London climate protest

Another delusional egomaniac. She'll fit in well in the halls of power when she's old enough.

Lets be honest, never mind the halls of power, as a delusional egomaniac she would fit in well in halls of residence

I'd have slightly more respect for her if she wasnt such a hypocrit. She uses plastics (made from oil), drugs (also oil), transport (you guessed it, oil), banks (oh sweet irony) and so on so forth. Practice what you preach.

A moron protesting about something which she has no idea about, followed by morons who have even less idea.

I'd have slightly more respect for her if she wasnt such a hypocrit. She uses plastics (made from oil), drugs (also oil), transport (you guessed it, oil), banks (oh sweet irony) and so on so forth. Practice what you preach.

I find this line of reasoning quite odd. It's a bit like those who seem to suggest that in order to be left wing you basically have to live in a box with your family and never buy anything.

The point is to reduce emissions so far as reasonably possible, while recognising that some emissions will ultimately always be necessary.

No emissions are necessary. Climate activists can be monks who eat berries they find and only own rags to hide their private parts! In order to be a climate activist while not being a hypocrite this is the one of the few ways possible.

Pray, do enlighten us about what you know about climate change...

If was to dump all the knowledge I have accumulated on this subject it would read like war and peace. Suffice to say spouting pointless lines like "stop climate change" is just not useful and she is a big proponent of renewables which clearly demonstrates her knowledge on the subject is limited at best (similar to your average politician tbh), given she doesn’t acknowledge any of the shortcomings of renewable energy nor does she understand the actual impact these energy sources have on the natural world in terms of space, wildlife etc. She is like most loud people with a "cause" very superficial and actually incorrect.

I find this line of reasoning quite odd. It's a bit like those who seem to suggest that in order to be left wing you basically have to live in a box with your family and never buy anything.

The point is to reduce emissions so far as reasonably possible, while recognising that some emissions will ultimately always be necessary.

This.
She comes from a very privileged family who used a **** ton of fossil fuels, and tells us plebs to reign down on our use of fossil fuels. Someone as naive as Greta isn't smart enough to have such a large audience and attention, she is just a face and there is probably someone in the shadows controlling her.

Except that isnt wehat shes after she wants zero emissions and for people to live like cavemen. Suffice it to say, people dislike being lectured on their daily habits by a teenager who doesnt even practice what she preaches. Ironically she probably has a higher carbon footprint than most people given her propensity for travelling around the place waving placards and telling people to sit infront of traffic.

So you're saying, on the basis of no evidence at all, and overwhelming evidence to the contrary, that renewables are worse for the environment than fossil fuels? 🙄🙄🙄

And yet you accuse her of knowing nothing about it...