Literally no idea how to respond to this, it's been quite a number of years since I encountered such puerility. As no particular contention appears forthcoming we must assume you have none to state
We aim to please
Short, sharp, deflection doesn't change the sense in what I'm saying, unfortunately, again, it just makes you lookun willing to engage, in an adult/intellectually open way, with the meat of a debate that
you yourself provoked
I do? News to me pal!
There's really no need for anything beyond a masucline-feminine spectrum, it caters to virtually all normal gender identities. Particularly abnormal gender identities are both in a small minority and typically demonstrative of mental illness, and, as such I don't really see that they form a legitimate basis for this mass proliferation of alternative gender concepts in a mainstream setting (sure, re: obscure niches/cults, whatever floats your boat)
Religion is not directly comparable for a number of reasons e.g. relating to the above, it's not a
singular spectrum, but a
series of rather more binary/categorical doctrines of belief
Indeed so, and I'm certainly still on my journey in that respect, and may never have a firm sense for the extent to which spirits pervade our existence, if at all